Displaying 1-20 of 154 results for

Read a detailed summary of the FY26 Senate Appropriations Bill, which was released on July 31.

The Senate released its version of the FY25 LHHS appropriation bill on August 1, 2024, with significant changes in proposed public health funding than the House's proposed bill.

ASTHO Legislative Prospectus | Previewing 2025 state legislative actions on data modernization and privacy.

ASTHO’s legislative prospectus on Immunization Information Systems, Health Information Exchanges, and balancing data privacy with sharing

ASTHO Legislative Prospectus | Previewing 2024 state legislative actions on data modernization and privacy.

Learn about the importance of exploring intermediaries that work alongside existing data platforms in addressing ongoing public health challenges.

Discover how improving public health data infrastructure can create more robust care for people with disabilities in this blog post.

Initial estimates from 2020 suggest that annual drug overdose deaths in the United States reached a record high of 93,000. Fortunately EMS strategies are being put in place to combat this nation-wide issue.

Social determinants of healthcare are the conditions in which people are born, live, work, play, worship, and age. Read how these issues affect population health.

This report shares results and key takeaways from interviews on topics including the overall structure of Legionnaires’ disease programs, diagnosis and clinical testing protocols, and risk communication.

This report analyzes the results from a survey of state and territorial health agency staff to collect information regarding health agency efforts to address climate change and extreme weather.

This report highlights key tools, resources, takeaways, and improvement strategies that health agencies can leverage to help navigate complex awards, increase efficiencies, and improve business processes.

This report highlights how a six-state "payers cohort," through the ASTHO/CDC Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Learning Collaborative, convened cross-sector teams which included payer partners, local health agency staff, academic institutions, community health workers, and other state‐ or local‐level stakeholders to support efforts to improve cardiovascular health outcomes, focusing on blood pressure control and reducing healthcare costs.

ASTHO’s guidebook, Leading Public Health Practice Through Health Informatics and Technology, provides additional information on achieving bidirectional data exchange and preparing for electronic case reporting adoption and implementation.

ASTHO Profile data shows how public health agencies are adopting AI, revealing policy gaps, workforce challenges, and uneven use across states.

Technical assistance for procuring software to support data dashboard development.

Sustaining DMI: Conditions for Enhanced Funding How state Medicaid agencies can receive enhanced federal funding for certain expenditures. What are the Conditions for Enhanced Funding? Why are they important? The Conditions for Enhanced Funding (CEF) are a series of federal requirements that states must meet to receive federal financial participation. If a state Medicaid agency (SMA) meets the CEF and couples them with measurable outcomes and metrics that improve the Medicaid program, it can receive enhanced funding at the rate of 90% to design, develop, or implement a Medicaid Enterprise Systems (MES) module or at 75% to operate and maintain an MES module. Each state operates an MES to manage its Medicaid data and run its program. Increasingly, SMAs’ MES are composed of independent modules in categories such as eligibility and enrollment and financial management. An SMA that uses these funds can build a strong financial foundation for a data modernization initiative and can secure reliable funding to better sustain the initiative. How can states receive enhancing funding to design, develop, implement, or operate and maintain an MES module? To receive enhanced federal funding, SMAs must collaborate with the federal government from the original implementation of their MES module and throughout its operations and maintenance. Frequently, SMAs begin the MES development journey through a request for planning funds. Planning activities include assessing impact, conducting a Medicaid Information Technology Architecture self-assessment, convening work groups to identify potential system enhancements, and exploring outcomes and metrics. These plans often are converted into requests for design, development, and implementation funding. The 90% funding match for design, development, and implementation could cover the performance of system fixes, establishing connectivity and interfaces, developing business continuity plans, software leasing, configuring off-the-shelf software, and ongoing planning activities. To receive the 75% funding match for operation and maintenance of an MES module, the state must have its module certified by and continuously report operational metrics to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). After certification, the SMA can receive enhanced federal funding to support security updates, software leasing or licensing, portal and technology maintenance and operation, and training for personnel engaged in the operation of the MES. Although these eligible activities are diverse, states should ultimately meet seven conditions for enhanced funding (Table 1): Modularity Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Industry standards Technology reuse and sharing Business processes Reports Interoperability Table - Resource - Sustaining DMI: Conditions for Enhanced Funding What best practices should states consider when seeking enhanced funding? If an SMA meets the CEF and couples them with measurable outcomes that improve the Medicaid program, it can receive enhanced funding. Public health data modernization initiatives and their ongoing support may be eligible for enhanced federal funding through the Medicaid program. Best practices include: Start the Streamlined Modular Certification early. Certification is a crucial piece of CEF and requires many interrelated activities. States should use the intake form to enter information about MES certification and CMS-required outcomes to develop documentation of their compliance with regulations applicable to their Medicaid-based data modernization initiative, state-specific outcomes, and metrics. The intake form can be used to show that the project is achieving outcomes on a continuous basis. Become familiar with CEF best practices. CMS highlights several best practices for successfully engaging with CEF. States should become familiar with this guidance to help them complete various required forms and documentation, understand connected activities, create realistic timelines, prevent duplication of work, identify efficiencies, and more. Identify outcomes that are feasible to achieve and measure and improve the Medicaid and public health programs. Some outcomes can take years to appear and intensive research and resources to measure. A state should identify outcomes that are feasible to achieve and measure based on its Medicaid-based data modernization initiative, available resources, staff capacity, and other factors. This includes setting measure targets that, when reached in the designated time, collectively provide proof that there is progress toward achieving Medicaid and public health outcomes. website yes

This report shares Puerto Rico’s strategy and recommendations for developing a social determinants of health dashboard.

In February 2019, ASTHO surveyed its members to understand how data is being utilized to address these harms in their jurisdictions. This brief summarizes the results of this survey and highlights data-based approaches used to address four types of opioid-related harms.

This brief highlights how the Georgia Department of Public Health and the Ohio Department of Health developed robust opioid overdose surveillance systems.