Displaying 201-205 of 205 results for

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the landscape of we go about preparing and responding to public health threats. In collaboration with CDC, ASTHO embarked on an initiative to identify effective resources, policies, and model practices utilized by state and territorial health agencies throughout the pandemic response. In this blog, we highlight four areas of focus that are central to any successful preparedness effort.

Designing for Connection Webinar Series article no

Public Health Organizations Unite in Call to Restore State and Local Emergency Funding and Approve Emergency Supplemental for Zika ARLINGTON, VA—As the weather warms and the threat of Zika virus intensifies, state and local health agencies are faced with the dilemma of a significant funding cut, as documented in two new reports released by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO), the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL), and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Absent dedicated funding from Congress to prepare and respond to the threat of Zika virus, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last month announced it will need to reprogram $44.25 million from the Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) fund to help combat Zika. State and local health agencies depend on PHEP funding to prepare and respond to health emergencies, everything from natural disasters to terrorist or mass casualty events. Preparing for and responding to emerging infectious disease is also a primary use of PHEP funding, meaning state and local health agencies will have less capability to find, control, and mitigate localized outbreaks of Zika as a result of the reallocation. ASTHO, in cooperation with CSTE, APHL, and NACCHO, asked their members what the consequences of the PHEP reprogramming would be, should the cuts take effect on July 1. The results raise significant concern showing that state and local emergency response will be compromised. Major findings from the surveys include the following. Community Preparedness Will Suffer the Most Both state (77%) and local (75%) respondents listed “Community Preparedness” as the area that will be most negatively affected. Scenario planning and training exercises will be curtailed or eliminated. Volunteer recruitment and training will slow or cease. Community partnerships and contracts with specialized vendors will be compromised. Laboratory Testing and Surveillance Capacity Will Diminish More than 70 percent (72%) of state respondents said they expect that functional preparedness programs, including disease surveillance, epidemiology, lab services, and mosquito control, would be negatively affected. Labs would be forced to delay or eliminate new equipment purchases or scheduled equipment maintenance. Public Health Staff Cuts State and local agencies suffered significant job losses—up to 20 percent—during and after the Great Recession that started in late 2007, and they have not come close to adding that number back since. Both state and local survey respondents report likely staffing cuts as a result of the PHEP reprogramming. Almost two-thirds (64%) of local health agencies responding to the survey said they expect to lose at least one health preparedness staff person. There is significant fear that this could worsen significantly if the reprogramming continues in future years as the threat of Zika is not expected to abate in the short term. Zika Response at State and Local Level Will Be Compromised as a Result of the Reallocation State and local health agency leaders are unified in saying the reduction of PHEP funding will harm their ability to respond to and control Zika once it establishes itself in the U.S. Our capacity to identify localized outbreaks and our capability to control and eliminate virus transmission will be slower. Local agency responders cited the following concerns: A decrease in staffing, Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) unit, or volunteer sustainability. A reduction in opportunities to provide staff trainings as well as plan and conduct exercises. An inability to conduct surveillance or epidemiologic investigations. At the state level, 61 percent of respondents say decreased PHEP funding in their state will significantly harm their ability to prepare for and respond to Zika. One respondent wrote: “The PHEP funding in [our state] is the resource we have for providing a response to Zika, and any other novel communicable disease. By reducing this funding you are reducing our ability to respond to a Zika event in [our state].” All public health sectors—federal, state, and local—have worked hard to build and sustain an all-hazards preparedness infrastructure that can deliver on their mission to protect and enhance the health and well-being of their constituents. However, large-scale emergencies, such as the 2009 influenza pandemic, Ebola, and Zika, require sufficient and reliable core funding to maintain a solid and ready public health infrastructure and additional emergency funds to provide the enhanced protections and services those living in the United States deserve and expect. Robbing the fund that sustains the all-hazards infrastructure to pay for large, widespread emergencies, no matter how necessary, ensures that infrastructure will deteriorate. Dedicated emergency funding that will enable all public health sectors to prepare for and respond to Zika is essential. ASTHO Press Release Boilerplate NACCHO Boilerplate APHL Boilerplate CSTE Boilerplate website yes

This episode dissects concerns at the southwest United States border, where health and governmental officials find themselves managing an extraordinarily complex situation: handling an increase in migration activity during a global pandemic.

The Boundary Spanning Leadership Framework’s Impact on Public Health Boundary Spanning Leadership's Impact on Public Health Alice Schenall, Tyrone Bethune, Alyssa Merski Explore three examples of Boundary Spanning Leadership's public health impact, from overdose to Alzheimer's to youth behavioral health. Since 2018, ASTHO has customized the Boundary Spanning Leadership (BSL) framework for the public health workforce. BSL develops leaders’ ability to create direction, alignment, and commitment (DAC) across both vertical and horizontal relationships within health departments and with community partners. The framework aims to work across differences in geography, demographics, leadership level, department, or unit. It’s designed for settings where the goal is not only to lead people but to lead across these differences, bridging agencies, sectors, levels of authority, and communities. In short, while many leadership models help individuals become more effective leaders, BSL equips public health professionals to mobilize collective leadership across systems, which is essential for addressing complex issues such as behavioral health and emergency response. Here are three examples of BSL’s impact and utility in public health, two of which are multi-state projects. Preventing and Responding to Overdose Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) leaders are faced with boundaries that can inhibit overdose surveillance and prevention activities without proper navigation. For example, partnership with community organizations to reduce overdose may not be effective without first exploring differences between the state health agency and community organization goals and working to build trust. Throughout BSL trainings, OD2A leaders have demonstrated many ways they bridge these boundaries and apply DAC in their overdose surveillance and prevention work. OD2A leaders may need to span boundaries… Between departments within the agencies in which they work. Between hierarchical levels within the organization. With external partners like community-based organizations. With diverse cultures, demographics, and populations with which they work like people who use drugs. Across rural/urban regions, states, or localities. Collaborating across these boundaries ensures stronger team relationships, exchange of perspectives, expertise, and experience, and alignment of vision and strategy to improve program impact. For example, BSL can help OD2A leaders secure critical health agency buy-in while meaningfully engaging people with lived experience in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of prevention programs. “This program allowed me to focus on specific skills and teach me things I had never learned before. My work will be significantly better because of this. I cannot tell you how important it has been to be able to network with the others as well.” — Participant of OD2A Reducing Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias In 2025 and 2026, ASTHO and the Alzheimer’s Association hosted two BSL trainings for health departments and their partners throughout the Healthy Brain Initiative. These helped equip them with a dynamic approach to addressing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) by aligning partners across public health, aging, and other sectors. Through DAC, participants engaged in dialogue that bridged boundaries to integrate brain health into chronic disease, injury prevention, and other public health initiatives. Applying BSL practices to brain health created synergies that addressed shared risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and lack of physical activity. BSL enabled state and jurisdictional teams to adapt quickly to the latest science, engage nontraditional partners, and build the skills needed to navigate potential boundaries. These practices strengthened cross-sector collaboration and built sustainable systems of shared investment and learning, positioning brain health as a priority across the public health landscape. ASTHO selected the BSL training because leaders who effectively collaborate across boundaries are better positioned to address complex public health challenges such as ADRD, which requires interagency and multisector action. Public health leaders need solutions, and there is evidence to support and measure the usefulness of BSL concepts. Participants successfully met the expectations and objectives of the workshop: Breakthrough Innovations: Drove creative solutions that integrated culturally responsive care and brain health promotion across settings. Cross-Functional Learning: Built shared understanding between public health, aging services, and community stakeholders to address complex problems (e.g., ageism, risk reduction, caregiver burnout, access to care). Partnership Development: Leveraged cross-sector collaborations to expand age-friendly environments and relationships. The BSL training left a lasting impact on those who completed the workshop, with participants reporting increased knowledge of major boundary types and mechanisms needed to boost ADRD strategies. Participants shared their excitement to immediately implement BSL elements into their public health practice. As BSL gains momentum and attention across the field, we urge organizations to leverage the framework as a conduit to build the capacity needed to accelerate brain health strategies and beyond. “My participation in this BSL training will have a lasting impact by strengthening both my individual capacity and our team's ability to approach strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and the development of sustainable. For my team, this will translate into stronger collaboration, clearer direction, and more cohesive implementation of our ADRD strategies.” — Participant of the Healthy Brain Initiative Building Bridges for Youth Behavioral Health in New Mexico In April 2026, leaders from New Mexico’s Departments of Health and Education came together — not just to coordinate but to truly collaborate. Partnering with ASTHO, they convened an in-person BSL training designed to move beyond siloed work and toward a shared vision for adolescent behavioral health in schools across the state. A total of 18 participants joined the training, representing a cross-sector mix of state agencies and community-based organizations. While the group brought diverse perspectives, they shared a common purpose: improving outcomes for young people across the state. The BSL framework offered them a structured way to navigate differences, build trust, and define collective direction. Throughout the workshop, participants deepened their understanding of the boundaries that often limit collaboration, whether structural, relational, or based on differences in processes and priorities. More importantly, they built the skills to identify and bridge those divides. For many, the experience shifted how they think about partnership — not as coordination across systems, but as intentional, interdependent, and relationship-driven leadership. The impact was immediate. Participants reported increased confidence in their ability to break down barriers and apply BSL strategies to advance adolescent behavioral health. Just as critical, they described forming authentic connections with colleagues across sectors, which laid the groundwork for more cohesive, aligned work ahead. Perhaps most telling: Every participant committed to using BSL strategies in the next 30 days to six months. This wasn’t a one-time training, it was the start of a new way of working. The group plans to continue meeting monthly to apply these tools, strengthening direction, alignment, and commitment in their shared efforts. “Addressing boundaries is a great practical step in all of the projects we will have going forward.” — Participant of New Mexico School-Based Health Program For public health professionals, the takeaway is clear. Complex challenges like youth behavioral health don’t sit neatly within one sector and they can’t be solved there either. Boundary spanning leadership offers a practical, human-centered approach to building the partnerships needed to create lasting change. Explore more of ASTHO's work in Boundary Spanning Leadership. article yes