Displaying 801-820 of 2364 results for

Federal and state legislation can play a role in promoting positive infant mental health by providing funding and policies that support early intervention, caregiver assistance, and the creation of nurturing environments conducive to their emotional well-being.

The first cohort of the STRETCH Initiative held two hybrid convenings, where ten state teams engaged with content experts and each other.

There are a number of court cases playing out across the country that could affect the options state and territorial health officials have to limit the spread of disease and promote health and well-being.

Tobacco control has been a public health success in states across the nation, but there is still work to be done, especially surrounding the popularity of menthol and other types of flavored tobacco.

Interpretive phenomenologist Jennifer Thomas talks about the importance of words and their impact on the public health workforce.

Public health leaders are positioned to prevent illness from the "tripledemic” of COVID-19, Influenza, and RSV with approved vaccines and preventative antibody treatments.

While communities transition from emergency response to long-term monitoring and recovery, the federal government and states are taking legislative action to improve emergency preparedness capabilities.

Six DELPH scholars give their insights to learn more about how the data modernization initiative and DEI intersect with public health.

State and Federal Actions to Reduce Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances’ Impact on Public Health safe drinking water act, per and polyfluoroalkyl substances, water supplies, contaminated groundwater, chemical companies, pfas contamination, forever chemicals, synthetic chemicals, maximum contaminant levels, industrial pretreatment program, polyfluoroalkyl substances pfas, chemical sales, chemical industry, bottled water, safe drinking water act sdwa, unregulated contaminants, companies in the world, united states, consumer products, 1996 amendments, national primary drinking water, surface water, water system, largest chemical companies, pfas strategic roadmap, primary drinking water regulations, pfas chemicals, pfoa and pfos, drinking water, testing for pfas, astho, association of state and territorial health officials Maggie Davis, Beth Giambrone State and Federal Actions to Reduce PFAS Impact on Public Health Since 2018, when the city of Stuart, Florida filed its lawsuit, communities across the United States have filed lawsuits against manufacturers that produce Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), alleging that they contaminated groundwater and exposed residents to these harmful chemicals. In June 2023, manufacturer 3M agreed to pay at least $10.3 billion to settle the Stuart lawsuit and others across the country with public drinking water systems. Similarly, chemical companies DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva reached $1.18 billion settlement with local communities that have detected PFAS in their water supplies. PFAS are synthetic chemicals used in products like nonstick cookware and firefighting foam, which can migrate to soil, water, and air during production and use. Most of these chemicals remain in the environment without breaking down—hence the nickname “forever chemicals”—and can cause harmful health effects (e.g., higher risks of kidney or testicular cancer, and pre-eclampsia or high blood pressure among pregnant people) and are prevalent across the nation. Evidence shows the widespread nature of exposure to the chemicals and the economic costs of exposure. For example, a 2023 USGS study estimated that at least 45% of tap water nationwide could have one or more PFAS, while recent research estimates the annual cost of the disease burden attributable to long-chain (i.e., six or more carbon) PFAS exposure to be at least $5 billion. As communities seek restitution for PFAS contamination, federal and state policymakers are working to eliminate PFAS from ground water and drinking water and to mitigate exposure to these forever chemicals. Eliminating PFAS in Drinking Water Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA has the authority to regulate the public drinking water supply in the United States. These regulations establish legally enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) or Treatment Techniques and non-enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) for public water systems. EPA’s recently proposed PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation could potentially add six different PFAS compounds to the list of regulated contaminants. Within the PFAS chemical family, PFOA and PFOS are proposed to each have MCLs of 4.0 parts per trillion (ppt), while PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and GenX would be regulated collectively as a mixture using EPA's Hazard Index approach. The proposed rule also could require public water systems to monitor and notify the public of PFAS levels and reduce the levels in drinking water if they exceed proposed standards. According to a survey conducted by the Environmental Council of the States, state guidelines vary; at least eleven states have established statewide MCLs for PFAS in drinking water. Some states prohibit their agencies from setting standards more stringent than federal ones and, in the absence of a federal standard, state agencies may hesitate to establish one that could easily be invalidated. In other cases, a lack of resources inhibits the agency’s capacity to set and enforce a PFAS standard. When a federal standard is established by EPA’s final rule, expected by the end of 2023, state primacy agencies will need to enforce the federal standard and adopt standards aligned with the federal standard or stronger within two years. Additional State Efforts to Reduce PFAS Exposure Even without MCLs, states are finding ways to mitigate the public’s exposure to PFAS. In 2023, states enacted legislation on banning PFAS in consumer products, increased requirements for testing and reporting of PFAS, and PFAS mitigation. Banning PFAS in Products Indiana enacted HB 1341 prohibiting fire departments from purchasing gear unless it contains a permanent label indicating whether it does or does not contain PFAS as of June 30, 2024. Minnesota’s HF 2310 prohibits selling or distributing products containing intentionally added PFAS beginning January 1, 2026. An exception may be made if the manufacturer submits information to the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency such as the product, the amount of PFAS used, and the amount of PFAS in the product. The Oregon legislature enacted SB 543, which prohibits the selling or using polystyrene foam containers for prepared food, food containers containing intentionally added PFAS, and polystyrene packaging peanuts. Washington enacted HB 1047, which prohibits manufacturing, distributing, and selling cosmetic products with PFAS and other chemicals or chemical classes as of January 1, 2025. Testing/Reporting Indiana enacted HB 1219, establishing a pilot program that collects blood samples of previous or current firefighters, analyzes the samples for serum PFAS levels, and determines whether there are corresponding health implications associated with elevated serum PFAS levels. Maine’s LD 1248 requires bottlers who extract water from the state to sell as bottled water to test, regularly monitor, and report the presence of PFAS to the Department of Health and Human Services and post the results on a public-facing website. Sales of bottled water are prohibited if PFAS levels in the water source exceed the state or federal community water system standards, whichever is lower. Currently, Maine has an interim MCL standard of 20 ppt. Virginia’s HB 2189 directs the State Water Control Board to adopt regulations requiring industrial users of publicly owned treatment works to test waste streams for PFAS before and after cleaning, repairing, refurbishing, or processing items the user knows or reasonably should know uses PFAS chemicals. West Virginia’s HB 3189 requires its Department of Environmental Protection to identify and address sources of PFAS in raw sources of public drinking water systems. It also requires facilities to report the use of PFAS if they discharge to surface waters under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit or to a Publicly Owned Treatment Works under an industrial pretreatment program. Mitigation Connecticut enacted SB 100 establishing a PFAS testing account, which provides municipalities with grants or reimbursements for testing and remediating PFAS in drinking water. Maine enacted LD 289, which requires the state to purchase the real estate of a commercial farm found to be contaminated by PFAS before January 1, 2023 at the assessed fair market value but at no less than $20,000 per acre, and provides that the fair market value assessment cannot take PFAS contamination into consideration. Two enacted bills in Rhode Island (SB 724 and HB 5861) amend current law to add that if PFAS in drinking water exceed the state’s interim standard of 20 ppt, the state and the public water supply will enter into an agreement that requires dates for submittal of water treatment plans that will reduce the PFAS levels to or below the interim level. As more information emerges about the health effects of PFAS, states will be sure to continue their work to combat, mitigate, and report on their presence in the environment. ASTHO will continue to monitor and report on all legislative and regulatory activity around this issue. Special Thanks-Blog - State and Federal Actions to Reduce PFAS Impact on Public Health website yes

Forming Partnerships to Increase Rural Immunization Rates ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, national immunization awareness month, farmworker communities, vaccine equity project, increase rural immunization, immunization rates, healthcare access, community action agencies, barriers to vaccine uptake, community partnerships, underlying medical conditions, back-to-school vaccinations, national community action partnership, vaccination strategies, vaccination importance, farmworker communities, challenges to healthcare access, vaccination rates, national center for farmworker health, rural immunization, preventable disease Shalini Nair, Heather Tomlinson ASTHO | Learn how public health partners with community organizations to bring vaccines to rural communities that otherwise would have difficulty accessing care in this blog. Rural communities face many challenges in accessing health care, like limited provider availability, gaps in insurance coverage, transportation issues, language barriers, and limited internet access. Additionally, rural populations are more likely to have underlying medical conditions, less likely to have insurance, and live farther from medical facilities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, overall routine vaccination coverage remained stable; however, there was a notable 4–5% drop in vaccination rates among young children living below the federal poverty level and in rural areas. In response, CDC developed the Let’s Rise initiative and a back-to-school campaign to provide actionable strategies and resources for getting Americans back on schedule with their routine vaccines. This month is National Immunization Awareness Month, highlighting the importance of vaccination for people of all ages. Boosting vaccine access and confidence is crucial to limit the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases. Barriers to Vaccine Uptake While they only account for 14% of Americans, rural communities represent nearly two-thirds of primary health care shortage areas. Due to the lack of providers, rural Americans often live over 10 miles from their closest health care facility and do not always have access to reliable transportation. Additionally, rural communities also have a larger proportion of people who are uninsured and underinsured. Studies have shown that primary care visits and strong provider recommendations can greatly enhance utilization of preventative health measures, such as vaccination, while limited access to these aspects can reduce health outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this disparity as many rural hospitals closed and the country faced national workforce shortages. Rural communities were significantly impacted, with 76% of rural adults knowing someone who had COVID-19 and 38% contracting COVID-19 themselves. Despite this impact, the majority of those polled reported this did not change their intent to get vaccinated. Furthermore, the gap in COVID-19 vaccination coverage between urban and rural areas more than doubled between April 2021 and January 2022, despite rural communities having disproportionately higher COVID-19 disease incidence and mortality. The digital divide also limits access to accurate information on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. States and community groups have taken various actions to address these barriers. Successful Strategies to Address Low Vaccination Rates in Rural Communities With support from CDC, ASTHO is working with the National Community Action Partnership and five community action agencies (CAAs) on the Partnering for Vaccine Equity project. A recent blog showcases some of the work the CAAs have implemented to improve vaccine acceptance and uptake and to customize evidence-based strategies to their own communities and neighborhoods. Two project partners, Pickens County Community Action and Enrichment Services Program, are working to build trust and increase vaccine uptake in rural Alabama by leveraging existing networks and taking a whole-health approach to outreach efforts. In Russell County, Enrichment Services deployed a highly successful paper- and social media-based messaging campaign centered around messages that emphasized three points: Vaccines are Safe, Vaccines Save Lives, and Vaccines Save Money. By reaching out to local churches, Enrichment Services was able to greatly expand the reach of their health promotion messages. In addition, to increase the number of available access points for vaccination, Enrichment Services co-located outreach at schools and engaged local EMT representatives from the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians for their first-hand knowledge of the community. Sample graphics from Enrichment Services' vaccine equity messaging campaign. In Pickens County, Pickens Community Action relied on existing partnerships with over 30 community organizations to kickstart their vaccine equity efforts. To address access-related barriers, Pickens sponsored rides to and from their vaccine clinics and partnered with local physicians to provide personalized counseling to individuals receiving vaccinations. Notably, they established both a faith-based and a disability services advisory committee to further assist their outreach efforts. Some of their existing partners in the community include the local National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Black Belt Community Foundation, Whatley Health System, Hill Hospital of Sumter County, The University of Alabama, and elected officials. Left: A food table being set up for Pickens’ Community Health Fair at the Tom Bevill Lock and Dam in Pickensville, AL. Right: A mobile outreach van from partner the University of Alabama rolls in to assist at Pickens’ Community Health Fair. For both agencies, offering services that address the social determinants of health greatly increased engagement. Both sites found success in offering incentives—such as food or gas gift cards and free food giveaways—but their greatest success has been from co-locating vaccine events with service offerings that address essential needs such as housing, utility assistance, or education. This model has proven highly successful not only for COVID-19 vaccines, but also as a sustainable strategy for general vaccine outreach. Increasing Vaccination Rates in Farmworker Communities Numerous successful strategies have been implemented in rural communities largely comprised of immigrants—with a special focus on migrant farmworkers, who labored throughout the pandemic due to the critical nature of their work. In addition to facing barriers related to transportation, health insurance, and language access, many farmworkers are not able to visit a clinic or pharmacy due to their long working hours. The National Center for Farmworker Health, in collaboration with CDC and over 40 different organizations, worked to diffuse funding, trainings, and tools for building capacity to act during the public health emergency. This network generated over 1.3 million COVID-19 related educational interactions with farmworkers and supported the distribution of over 108,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses during 2020 and 2021. The network also documented effective practices undertaken by community-based organizations and agricultural employers to distribute vaccines, dispel myths, and build vaccine confidence. Photos courtesy of the Guatemalan-Maya Center (left) and National Center for Farmworker Health (right). State Considerations for Implementation Collaboration with trusted community groups can amplify state efforts to vaccinate communities, particularly in those with low vaccination rates. Working with CAAs and organizations that understand their communities and utilize innovative outreach strategies can help states expand the reach of their messaging. Communications should be tailored to include multilingual messaging and images that resonate with targeted communities. The National Governors Association developed a guide that provides valuable strategies for states to increase vaccine uptake in their rural communities. To help address the digital divide in their communities, several states have made investments in their digital infrastructure. Partnering with local pharmacies, federally qualified health centers, and emergency medical services to offer alternative vaccination sites in communities has been integral in improving awareness and access. Holding mobile vaccine clinics with after-hours availability or offering transportation to and from vaccine clinics can help address transportation issues and make vaccines accessible in communities with limited health care facilities. Addressing immunizationinequities in rural communities requires understanding the community and implementing innovative strategies tailored to these populations. Partnering with community-based organizations can help states reach critical audiences and ensure that vaccine efforts are addressing relevant barriers. article yes

As AI adoption grows in public health, understanding its uses and ensuring responsible application are key to protecting privacy, minimizing bias, and improving outcomes.

As the overdose epidemic continues, it is imperative for the medicolegal death investigative community to understand the importance of continuous training and the role that accurate death certification plays in protecting the nation’s health.

Whatever stage agencies are in addressing the intersection of suicide, overdose, and ACEs, ASTHO’s SPACECAT Capacity Elements Toolkit simplifies action ideas for health agency staff and leadership to begin or continue their efforts.

Sandra Powell, deputy director of Rhode Island Department of Health, how her department was able to increase the number of permanent positions to meet critical public health needs.

In the current legislative cycle, there are several policy strategies that support the development and integration of community health workers into the public health workforce, including dedicated federal funding and state laws supporting workforce development programs, certification standards, and Medicaid coverage.

As the United States begins to see more wildfires, it is important for health agencies to be ready to address concerns from the public and collaborate with other state agencies to mitigate the health risks of wildfire smoke.

States have largely dismissed weakening policies, but legislatures are likely to continue considering vaccine-related bills, which may allow public health leaders to work collaboratively toward improving vaccination rates and bolster the positive impact vaccines have on population health.

We can prepare for the future of health equity and data by ensuring the equitable collection of data and building systems that are flexible enough to account for forward progress.

ASTHO spoke with Palina Louangketh about her history as a refugee to the United States, her extensive work in expanding health equity in Idaho, and how her past has influenced her present.

An analysis of the state of the federal budget in the wake of the May 2023 agreement between lawmakers and President Biden, who struck a last-minute deal to raise the nation’s debt limit until 2025.