Displaying 121-140 of 205 results for

The Boundary Spanning Leadership Framework’s Impact on Public Health Boundary Spanning Leadership's Impact on Public Health Alice Schenall, Tyrone Bethune, Alyssa Merski Explore three examples of Boundary Spanning Leadership's public health impact, from overdose to Alzheimer's to youth behavioral health. Since 2018, ASTHO has customized the Boundary Spanning Leadership (BSL) framework for the public health workforce. BSL develops leaders’ ability to create direction, alignment, and commitment (DAC) across both vertical and horizontal relationships within health departments and with community partners. The framework aims to work across differences in geography, demographics, leadership level, department, or unit. It’s designed for settings where the goal is not only to lead people but to lead across these differences, bridging agencies, sectors, levels of authority, and communities. In short, while many leadership models help individuals become more effective leaders, BSL equips public health professionals to mobilize collective leadership across systems, which is essential for addressing complex issues such as behavioral health and emergency response. Here are three examples of BSL’s impact and utility in public health, two of which are multi-state projects. Preventing and Responding to Overdose Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) leaders are faced with boundaries that can inhibit overdose surveillance and prevention activities without proper navigation. For example, partnership with community organizations to reduce overdose may not be effective without first exploring differences between the state health agency and community organization goals and working to build trust. Throughout BSL trainings, OD2A leaders have demonstrated many ways they bridge these boundaries and apply DAC in their overdose surveillance and prevention work. OD2A leaders may need to span boundaries… Between departments within the agencies in which they work. Between hierarchical levels within the organization. With external partners like community-based organizations. With diverse cultures, demographics, and populations with which they work like people who use drugs. Across rural/urban regions, states, or localities. Collaborating across these boundaries ensures stronger team relationships, exchange of perspectives, expertise, and experience, and alignment of vision and strategy to improve program impact. For example, BSL can help OD2A leaders secure critical health agency buy-in while meaningfully engaging people with lived experience in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of prevention programs. “This program allowed me to focus on specific skills and teach me things I had never learned before. My work will be significantly better because of this. I cannot tell you how important it has been to be able to network with the others as well.” — Participant of OD2A Reducing Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias In 2025 and 2026, ASTHO and the Alzheimer’s Association hosted two BSL trainings for health departments and their partners throughout the Healthy Brain Initiative. These helped equip them with a dynamic approach to addressing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) by aligning partners across public health, aging, and other sectors. Through DAC, participants engaged in dialogue that bridged boundaries to integrate brain health into chronic disease, injury prevention, and other public health initiatives. Applying BSL practices to brain health created synergies that addressed shared risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and lack of physical activity. BSL enabled state and jurisdictional teams to adapt quickly to the latest science, engage nontraditional partners, and build the skills needed to navigate potential boundaries. These practices strengthened cross-sector collaboration and built sustainable systems of shared investment and learning, positioning brain health as a priority across the public health landscape. ASTHO selected the BSL training because leaders who effectively collaborate across boundaries are better positioned to address complex public health challenges such as ADRD, which requires interagency and multisector action. Public health leaders need solutions, and there is evidence to support and measure the usefulness of BSL concepts. Participants successfully met the expectations and objectives of the workshop: Breakthrough Innovations: Drove creative solutions that integrated culturally responsive care and brain health promotion across settings. Cross-Functional Learning: Built shared understanding between public health, aging services, and community stakeholders to address complex problems (e.g., ageism, risk reduction, caregiver burnout, access to care). Partnership Development: Leveraged cross-sector collaborations to expand age-friendly environments and relationships. The BSL training left a lasting impact on those who completed the workshop, with participants reporting increased knowledge of major boundary types and mechanisms needed to boost ADRD strategies. Participants shared their excitement to immediately implement BSL elements into their public health practice. As BSL gains momentum and attention across the field, we urge organizations to leverage the framework as a conduit to build the capacity needed to accelerate brain health strategies and beyond. “My participation in this BSL training will have a lasting impact by strengthening both my individual capacity and our team's ability to approach strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and the development of sustainable. For my team, this will translate into stronger collaboration, clearer direction, and more cohesive implementation of our ADRD strategies.” — Participant of the Healthy Brain Initiative Building Bridges for Youth Behavioral Health in New Mexico In April 2026, leaders from New Mexico’s Departments of Health and Education came together — not just to coordinate but to truly collaborate. Partnering with ASTHO, they convened an in-person BSL training designed to move beyond siloed work and toward a shared vision for adolescent behavioral health in schools across the state. A total of 18 participants joined the training, representing a cross-sector mix of state agencies and community-based organizations. While the group brought diverse perspectives, they shared a common purpose: improving outcomes for young people across the state. The BSL framework offered them a structured way to navigate differences, build trust, and define collective direction. Throughout the workshop, participants deepened their understanding of the boundaries that often limit collaboration, whether structural, relational, or based on differences in processes and priorities. More importantly, they built the skills to identify and bridge those divides. For many, the experience shifted how they think about partnership — not as coordination across systems, but as intentional, interdependent, and relationship-driven leadership. The impact was immediate. Participants reported increased confidence in their ability to break down barriers and apply BSL strategies to advance adolescent behavioral health. Just as critical, they described forming authentic connections with colleagues across sectors, which laid the groundwork for more cohesive, aligned work ahead. Perhaps most telling: Every participant committed to using BSL strategies in the next 30 days to six months. This wasn’t a one-time training, it was the start of a new way of working. The group plans to continue meeting monthly to apply these tools, strengthening direction, alignment, and commitment in their shared efforts. “Addressing boundaries is a great practical step in all of the projects we will have going forward.” — Participant of New Mexico School-Based Health Program For public health professionals, the takeaway is clear. Complex challenges like youth behavioral health don’t sit neatly within one sector and they can’t be solved there either. Boundary spanning leadership offers a practical, human-centered approach to building the partnerships needed to create lasting change. Explore more of ASTHO's work in Boundary Spanning Leadership. article yes

How Palau is Advancing Its Data Modernization Infrastructure and Capacity Through Partnership How Palau is Advancing Its Data Modernization Infrastructure and Capacity Through Partnership Saisha Adhikari Discover how Palau is improving public health data by leveraging private-sector partnership in this blog post. The Republic of Palau is navigating a rapidly shifting public health landscape with an approach rooted in creativity, clarity, and community. Rather than slowing down in the face of limited staffing and competing priorities, the Ministry of Health and Human Services (MoHSS) has chosen to use this moment to build systems that will last. Through Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG) funding, Palau hired HealthEfficient, a health care consulting organization, to support data modernization (DM) initiatives, including a new national electronic health record (EHR). Palau previously collaborated with HealthEfficient through the Pacific Islands Primary Care Association (PIPCA), which introduced HealthEfficient to the region through a multi-year initiative to support regional EHR planning, readiness, and adoption. During that time, HealthEfficient developed a strong understanding of Palau’s priorities, needs, and operating context. Palau subsequently joined HealthEfficient's Health Center Controlled Network. This multi-phased, ongoing partnership has helped Palau bring structure to complex work, expand internal capacity, and make progress on long-standing priorities. Laying the Groundwork for Meaningful Progress As part of its PHIG workplan, MoHSS is committed to adopting modern, flexible technologies and standards, reducing data silos, and strengthening its workforce. Given the need for external support to implement the EHR, Palau also considered how to leverage its partnerships to advance broader DM efforts. MoHSS collaborated with ASTHO to clarify needs and what success should look like. This preparation, combined with HealthEfficient’s familiarity with Palau’s health system and cultural context, created a strong foundation for their partnership. HealthEfficient has been instrumental as Palau transitions from a largely manual system to a modern, comprehensive EHR. The consultant’s ability to understand local realities of how staff work, how communities engage with health services, and what modernization means in Palau’s context has helped decisions remain grounded in what the country truly needs. Project Management as a Capacity-Building Strategy HealthEfficient serves as an extension of the MoHSS team, managing day-to-day coordination and creating structure around the DM work. They lead agendas, capture meeting notes, track progress, and manage overall project flow. This allows Palau MoHSS staff to stay focused on vision, strategy, and local leadership. Palau MoHSS and HealthEfficient meet on a consistent cadence: twice weekly on EHR implementation and twice monthly on broader DM activities. As demand has increased, additional meetings and hours are scheduled as needed throughout the week. This rhythm keeps the work aligned while giving each workstream to move at its own pace. Due to capacity, MoHSS moved the EHR launch from December 2025 to the first half of 2026. Rather than treating this as a setback, they used the new timeline as an opportunity to refine workflows and better support staff. Together, MoHSS and HealthEfficient updated their approach and kept the work moving. Although the workload is still considerable, the partnership has made it manageable. Clear roles, shared communication, and reliable structure have allowed the team to maintain momentum without overwhelming MoHSS staff. This progress is also driven by a strong internal MoHSS team of five staff members, several of whom are featured in this blog, who are working closely with HealthEfficient and the EHR vendor to move implementation forward. Sherilynn Madraisau, Director of the Bureau of Public Health Services at MOHSS, explained: “Even with limited staffing, leadership recognized how critical this project was for Palau and contracted HealthEfficient not only to manage much of the day-to-day work but also to help build our internal capacity, ultimately strengthening overall systems and creating long-term impact.” Navigating Challenges with Cultural Awareness Like many small jurisdictions, Palau MoHSS faces: Limited staffing and competing priorities. Navigating technical jargon. The need to coordinate across multiple external partners. These challenges show up in real ways: teams are stretched across responsibilities, vendors may not understand local context, and cross-agency communication requires ongoing attention. Edolem Ikerdeu, Executive Director of the Palau Community Health Center, noted the importance of cultural mediation in this work: “Our consultants bring valuable expertise and guidance, but it’s equally important that the work reflects our culture and our priorities.” Her role includes working with staff members to help partners understand context, smoothing miscommunication, and ensuring all stakeholders stay aligned around the mission of serving Palau’s people. That spirit of shared learning and adaptation is echoed across the team. Tmong Udui, Acting Chief of Division of Health Informatics and Intelligence at MoHSS, added, “A lot has been new for [staff], but learning together and building skills in this new area has been a good experience.” Partner engagement remains personal and intentional. The MoHSS team keeps partners engaged by having real conversations, naming the shared purpose, and showing exactly how the EHR will help the whole country, not just the health sector. Early Wins and Emerging Strengths Even just a few months into the EHR migration, MoHSS is already seeing measurable progress: Accelerated EHR Implementation: After years of anticipation, MoHSS now has a clear structure, dedicated support, and renewed momentum behind the EHR work. Informed Technology Decisions: With HealthEfficient at the table for external stakeholder discussions, MoHSS has had a trusted advisor to help evaluate system options and advocate for what best fits the country’s needs. Growing Internal Capacity: Through trainings and ongoing collaboration with subject-matter experts, staff are strengthening their skills in cybersecurity, systems upgrades, and process improvement. Stronger Organizational Coordination: Clear oversight and consistent communication have helped reduce the burden on staff and increased alignment across the ministry. These wins reflect progress beyond just technology, but in confidence, communication, and long-term planning. The work is strengthening the system as a whole and not just a single project. A Foundation for the Future With HealthEfficient managing much of the operational load for DM, Palau can focus on guiding strategy and determining long-term direction. HealthEfficient advances the work; MoHSS shapes the vision. Edolem Ikerdeu shared, “If you hire people and the funding goes away, then what is this for? We want a stronger system that includes the people who are already here.” Palau’s approach offers a compelling model for other resource-limited jurisdictions: Start with clarity. Build the right partnerships. Protect space for local leadership. Design systems that will outlast short-term funding. By centering community, embracing thoughtful project management, and working with culturally aligned partners, Palau MoHSS is building public health infrastructure that will serve its people well into the future. Reviewed by - Lindsey Myers OE22-2203 PHIG article yes

Targeted engagement. Scalable impact.

Learn how state public health programs like Title V can help sustain community engagement infrastructure.

Wisconsin is leaning into teamwork to address homelessness and safe housing in the state.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine hesitancy has increased because of misinformation and disinformation spreading across social and traditional media platforms, targeting vulnerable and underserved communities, and further stalling vaccine uptake. ASTHO hosted representatives from faith- and community-based organizations, universities and colleges, healthcare systems, and other stakeholder groups to discuss the drivers of misinformation and disinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how public health can move forward to address vaccine hesitancy.

The emPOWER program provides federal data, mapping, and artificial intelligence tools, as well as training and resources, to help communities nationwide protect the health of at-risk Medicare beneficiaries who live independently and rely on electric-powered medical devices or receive certain medical services, such as outpatient dialysis, home-based oxygen service, hospice care or other types of home care medical support.

Developing and implementing contact tracing programs in K-12 schools presents a crucial opportunity for both health department and school leaders to keep students healthy, and schools open. This brief shares considerations for health departments working with schools to develop and implement contact tracing programs.

In the United States, suicide and overdose are among the top 10 leading causes of death. At the intersection of suicide and overdose are shared factors that can be assessed to support a comprehensive approach to prevention. The COVID-19 pandemic has created additional stress on communities and individuals, straining resources and exacerbating the suicide and overdose epidemics. This infographic is a tool that can assist states and territories in fostering cross-sector partnerships by demonstrating the intersection of suicide and overdose and how a multi-sector approach can lead to comprehensive prevention. This infographic also reminds us that we can build healthy and supportive communities together, in a strategic and unified way.

The findings detailed in this report were gathered during a series of School Behavioral Health Advisory Committee convenings in spring 2021. The goal was identify policy gaps and strategies for delivering behavioral health services in schools. Final recommendations include: develop shared communication and vision; enhance state-cross sector partnerships; use data driven action; and implement innovative policies to improve access to services

This report highlights lessons learned about how to remain resilient in the face of complex disasters and environmental events, following two listening sessions hosted by ASTHO and the Environmental Council of the States.

Explore ASTHO's Medicaid Oversight Governance Map to understand the governance structures of state and territorial health agencies across the country.

Innovative Partnerships for Adverse Childhood Experiences Prevention Collaboration and coordination with stakeholders are essential to amplifying state and territorial health agency injury and violence prevention (IVP) programs to prevent adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and achieve community health impact. While collaboration often occurs through one-on- one partnerships, state IVP programs play a critical convening role, bringing multiple stakeholders together to address ACEs prevention more holistically. In basic form, partnerships among stakeholders yield general support for shared initiatives, but they become increasingly meaningful when resources — data, funding, training, and staff — are shared or exchanged. Get the Resource (PDF) article yes

Improving a State’s Process for Disclosing Data for Public Health Purposes to Tribal Public Health Organizations

Formal partnerships between health agencies and private companies can lead to resource sharing, expertise exchange, and improved health services delivery. The strategies outlined in this resource provide a comprehensive approach to enhancing health equity through public-private collaboration.

Health in All Policies Evaluation Tool for State and Local Health Departments ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, social determinants of health, promote health equity, highest level of health, united states, health inequities, improved health, health outcomes, influence health, health in all policies task force, national association of county and city health officials, department of public health, achieve health equity, advance health equity, local public health, health care system, local health departments, public health institute, public health professionals, community health workers, health including, health in all policies (hiap), evaluation tool, state and local health departments, health equity, public health practice This tool provides several strategies for health agencies to incorporate Health in All Policies into their programs. State and local health departments are investing in Health in All Policies (HiAP) as a strategy to incorporate health equity into local decision-making processes. HiAP encourages engaging partners from diverse backgrounds—such as transportation, housing, education, and environment, and other sectors—to address the root causes of health disparities that are deeply intertwined with social, economic, and environmental factors. Many health departments are seeking to evaluate the benefits of investing in integrating HiAP into their public health practice. To support the development of robust evaluations, ASTHO—in partnership with the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) and with funding provided by CDC's National Center for Environmental Health—developed this HiAP Evaluation Tool for local and state health department to provide structure and guidance for evaluating HiAP initiatives. Get the Resource (PDF) website yes

Navigating Public Health Planning with Precision and Purpose Discover examples and best practices for developing strategic plans that enhance community health outcomes. Embarking on the journey of public health planning demands more than good intentions. It requires a meticulous blueprint that encompasses budgetary considerations and strategic timelines, and effectively leverages external support. Across a landscape in which every decision has the potential to uplift entire communities, there are a world of opportunities and details to explore. Included among them are the critical components of crafting a robust plan, the value of engaging contractors, and strategies for optimizing resources. Mining Existing Plans for Insight and Inspiration Organizational strategic plans, Community Health Assessments (CHAs), and Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) can supply guidance and inspiration for comprehensive public health planning. These documents offer both valuable insights into public health initiatives and tangible examples of effective planning frameworks. There are multiple examples of existing plans within health agencies across jurisdictions; when seeking them out, consider various criteria (e.g., population characteristics, geographic location, and specific health priorities). By examining plans tailored to communities with similar demographics or facing comparable health challenges, planners can apply approaches that resonate in their own context. Additionally, understanding the distinctions between strategic plans, CHAs, and CHIPs is essential, particularly for agencies aspiring towards PHAB Pathways Recognition Program or PHAB Accreditation. These plans are separate entities within the PHAB framework, each playing a vital role in shaping public health strategies and fostering community well-being. Strategic Plans Strategic plans outline organizational goals, plans to achieve them, and how to measure success. They drive resource allocation, decision-making, and other priorities organization wide. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Hawaii Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Community Health Assessments Community health assessments offer a complete view of risks, resources, and factors influencing outcomes. Supported by diverse environmental and socio-economic data, CHAs inform health policy, staff protocols, partnerships, program development, funding, resource allocation, and health improvement planning. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Oneida Nation* Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Pierce County, WA* Community Health Improvement Plans Community Health Improvement Plans are strategic, collaborative roadmaps derived from CHAs. They outline how health agencies, partners, and communities will unite to enhance overall health. They guide priorities, resource allocation, and steer project, program, and policy implementation. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Hawaii Oneida Nation* Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Pierce County, WA* *PHAB Accredited Health Department Plan Components, Timeline, and Budget Agencies considering planning processes and examples from other jurisdictions should recognize the diversity in approaches across different agencies and jurisdictions. There truly isn’t a singular “right” way to undertake public health planning. Instead, it’s about tailoring the process to suit the jurisdiction’s unique needs and circumstances. Examples to Guide Plan Development The Kansas Institute of Health’s Strategic Planning in the Public Health Sector Handbook offers a comprehensive breakdown of planning elements and timeframes based on a six-month plan development calendar. Explore Minnesota Department of Health’s Community Health Assessment and Planning Toolkit, a rich resource for navigating the CHA-CHIP process and timeline. Their template includes a detailed approach that considers capacity to accomplish each step within a desired timeline. Given the variation in the depth and breadth of jurisdiction planning processes, it is challenging to pinpoint a specific dollar amount to cover a planning endeavor. NACCHO’s MAPP Budget Template (part of their downloadable MAPP 2.0 process) can help systematically think through the resources necessary for planning processes. Outsourcing Key Support External support—in the form of facilitators, contractors, or other specialized professionals—can play a pivotal role in enhancing public health planning by offering fresh insights, innovative strategies, and diverse perspectives. Such support also allows for full, active organizational participation in the planning process. Moreover, they can provide valuable technical assistance, helping to navigate complex challenges and identify best practices from other contexts. By harnessing external support, organizations can optimize their decision-making processes, foster collaboration, and enhance the delivery of services to communities, thereby promoting better health outcomes for all. Conducting a SWOT Analysis: Contractors can assist in facilitating a thorough analysis of the organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT). This structured assessment helps identify internal factors that impact the organization's ability to achieve its objectives and external factors that may affect its operations. Proposing Strategic Priorities: Based on the SWOT analysis and input from stakeholders, contractors can help planning teams crystallize priorities aligned with the organization's mission and vision. These priorities serve as the foundation for developing the plan. Facilitating Steering Committee Meetings: Steering committee meetings are crucial for decision-making and guiding the strategic planning process. External facilitators can lead these meetings, ensuring productive discussions, consensus-building, and alignment with organizational goals. Developing Components of the Strategic Plan: Contractors can support in drafting or reviewing various components of the plan, including vision and mission statements, goals, objectives, and action plans. They may ensure these components are clear, concise, and aligned with the overarching strategic direction. Developing a Draft Implementation Plan: An implementation plan outlines how to achieve strategic goals, including timelines, responsible parties, and resource allocation. Contractors can support an organization to develop a draft implementation plan that outlines actionable steps to translate the strategic plan into reality. Developing Quality Improvement Metrics: Contractors can assist in guiding the development of metrics to measure the effectiveness of the strategic plan. These metrics should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART), providing a framework for monitoring progress and making data-driven decisions. Conducting Training Among Organization Staff: To ensure buy-in and understanding of the strategic plan and process itself, contractors can help develop and co-facilitate training sessions for staff members. These sessions may cover strategic objectives, action plans, and their roles in achieving organizational goals. Developing a Communication Plan: Effective communication is an essential key for keeping any strategic plan off the shelf. Contractors can support an organization in developing a comprehensive communication plan that outlines key messages, target audiences, communication channels, and timelines to ensure consistent and transparent communication throughout the organization and with partners. Developing Process Logs, Templates, and Meeting Notes: Contractors can create documentation tools such as process logs, templates for strategic planning documents, and detailed meeting notes. These resources streamline the planning process, capture important discussions and decisions, and serve as valuable references when considering sustainability. In summary, external support brings valuable expertise and resources to public health planning processes, enabling organizations to navigate complexities, engage partners effectively, and develop actionable strategic plans that drive positive health outcomes for communities. OE22-2203 PHIG website yes

Strengthening Long-Term Care Capacity in Island Jurisdictions Through Policy Using Policy to Strengthen Islands' Long-Term Care Capacity Lana McKinney Explore policy levers island jurisdictions can use to strengthen long-term care capacity like payment flexibilities, workforce, and collaborative partnerships. Acute care facilities in U.S. territories and freely associated states experience significant strains on capacity, driven by: Difficulty transitioning medically stable patients to the next appropriate level of care. Insufficient staff to meet patient needs. Limited transitional or extended care facilities. This creates a bottleneck that compromises the efficiency and stability of health systems. However, there are policy levers available to island jurisdictions that can support appropriate care for patients requiring institutional or home-based services and supports. These include payment flexibilities, workforce initiatives, and collaborative partnerships. Current State Infrastructure Island jurisdictions have limited hospital and long-term care (LTC) facility capacity. While many have government-run hospitals, three jurisdictions — American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), and Palau — have only one hospital, the Federated States of Micronesia has one hospital per state, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) each operate one hospital in both of their most populous islands. Additionally, Guam has just one Medicare-certified skilled nursing facility with 40 Medicare beds, operated by the Guam Memorial Hospital Authority, while Puerto Rico has nine Medicare-certified nursing homes for a population of more than three million people. Without LTC facility capacity, hospitals lack appropriate options for discharge. Geographic isolation, difficulties with recruitment and retention of sufficiently skilled staff (i.e., nursing staff), and supply chain challenges are additional obstacles to establishing and maintaining LTC capacity. Reimbursement Federal health care programs also influence the availability of LTC services in the territories. Medicare and Medicaid may cover LTC services under different circumstances; however, federal funding restrictions limit Medicaid in the territories compared to the states. Unlike the annually calculated, income-based Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) for states, the territories have a fixed FMAP. The current permanent FMAP for American Samoa, Guam, CNMI, and USVI is 83%, while Puerto Rico’s is 76% through FY2027. Medicaid funding for the territories also operates under a statutory cap allotment, meaning once the federal allotment is exhausted, the territory must cover all subsequent service costs with local funds. This frequently results in territories expending federal funding mid-year, which leads to service restrictions for residents and financial instability for providers. Finally, while the territories have additional financing restrictions, CNMI and American Samoa are able to operate their Medicaid programs under a special waiver authority. Policy Strategies A number of policy strategies may limit the strain on acute care facilities, address LTC needs, and support the provision of appropriate levels of care in island jurisdictions: Workforce Development Recruitment and retention of health care workers is a challenge in island jurisdictions, but public health and rural health care workforce strategies may help address staffing needs and capacity. Encourage employers and educational institutions to partner with local colleges, vocational schools, and community centers to develop apprenticeship programs and formal career pathways that support skills development, professional advancement, and patient and community needs. Identify available educational programs across the region to support a pipeline for students entering medical, nursing, pharmacy, and behavioral health careers. Promote and support dedicated in person recruitment opportunities as well as broader strategies that support local candidates and students. Develop cross-jurisdictional workforce agreements that allow training completed in one island jurisdiction to be recognized in another. Explore workforce training opportunities through commissions (e.g., Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education), universities (e.g., the Pacific Islands Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program), and public health associations (e.g., Equipping Community Health Workers to Address Alzheimer’s) as well as curriculum exchange and workgroups (e.g., USAPI Health Workforce Development Technical Working Group). Support partnerships among island jurisdictions to share resources and learnings related to facility development, financial models, and reimbursement strategies. For public employers, decentralize HR functions to create a more efficient hiring process. For jurisdictions with professional schools and programs, develop additional training models (i.e., short-term or extended rural placements) or blended learning. Medicaid and Other Federal Health Programs U.S. territories can also consider Medicaid policies that encourage community supports over institutional care or pursue other program flexibilities through waivers or state plan amendments. For example, states and territories can provide Home and Community-Based Services and use different authorities to achieve their policy goals. Implementing a Section 1115 demonstration allows for significant flexibility but must be budget neutral. In addition, the Money Follows the Person demonstration supports community-based services over institutional care. CMS awarded time-limited planning grants to Puerto Rico and American Samoa for this initiative. Additionally, the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly helps older adults remain at home and offers comprehensive medical and social services to eligible individuals. Supported Care Transitions Several models support patients moving from hospital to home to control chronic conditions, limit readmissions and emergency department visits, reduce costs, and improve outcomes overall. This includes the Care Transitions Intervention, a short-term training program for patients and caregivers to navigate the move home. The coach’s credentials are flexible and can include nurses, social workers, community health workers, or other professionals. Meanwhile, the Transitional Care Model, provides ongoing care management and is led by an advanced practice nurse. Collaboration Strategic partnerships can drive policies that support healthy aging or aging in place. For example, USVI established a commission on aging, while Guam enacted a senior citizens housing task force, both with multi-sector representation. And in December 2025, American Samoa’s Governor issued an Executive Order establishing a Home and Community-Based Services Commission as part of its Money Follows the Person plan, which includes representatives from a number of governmental agencies and areas of expertise. Legislation Island legislatures have also explored strategies that support older adults and those with complex health care needs and their families: Guam (No. 31-38 (COR)) would establish a regulatory framework for assisted living facilities with the goal of facilitating their development and operation. In 2023, USVI 35-0119 authorized mobile integrated health programs to leverage health care personnel for in-home services and prevent costly hospital readmissions. CNMI considered a resolution to explore several policy strategies, including leveraging Medicaid flexibilities, and prioritizing collaboration and financial support to meet the needs of elderly residents. In 2026, Puerto Rico enacted legislation to improve access to information about the benefits and services available to older adults. Reviewed by - Baker-White, Kearly, Sands Leavitt, Wheatley article yes

ASTHO, with support from CDC, launched the first cohort of the Linking Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and Clinical Outcomes Data Multi-Jurisdiction Learning Community in October 2021. This brief examines themes that emerged from conversations in the learning community about the challenges encountered during data linking activities and discussed lessons they learned.

Discover how Colorado, Maine, and New York used data-driven strategies to lower suicide and opioid overdose rates.