Displaying 141-160 of 205 results for

Search Filters: Partnership cancel

The Public Health Workforce in the COVID-19 Era: Survey Results Characterize their Work, Needs, Roles, and Satisfaction

News,

On Aug. 3, 2022, ASTHO and the de Beaumont Foundation announced the 2021 PH WINS findings. They provide a unique snapshot of the state and local government public health workforce.

Community Partners Offer Key Insights to Health Departments for Increasing Vaccine Confidence

During the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine hesitancy has increased because of misinformation and disinformation spreading across social and traditional media platforms, targeting vulnerable and underserved communities, and further stalling vaccine uptake. ASTHO hosted representatives from faith- and community-based organizations, universities and colleges, healthcare systems, and other stakeholder groups to discuss the drivers of misinformation and disinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how public health can move forward to address vaccine hesitancy.

Leveraging the HHS emPOWER Program to Enhance Power Outage Planning

The emPOWER program provides federal data, mapping, and artificial intelligence tools, as well as training and resources, to help communities nationwide protect the health of at-risk Medicare beneficiaries who live independently and rely on electric-powered medical devices or receive certain medical services, such as outpatient dialysis, home-based oxygen service, hospice care or other types of home care medical support.

How Health Departments Can Work With Schools to Improve K-12 Contact Tracing Programs

Developing and implementing contact tracing programs in K-12 schools presents a crucial opportunity for both health department and school leaders to keep students healthy, and schools open. This brief shares considerations for health departments working with schools to develop and implement contact tracing programs.

Strengthening Long-Term Care Capacity in Island Jurisdictions Through Policy

Guam,

Strengthening Long-Term Care Capacity in Island Jurisdictions Through Policy Using Policy to Strengthen Islands' Long-Term Care Capacity Lana McKinney Explore policy levers island jurisdictions can use to strengthen long-term care capacity like payment flexibilities, workforce, and collaborative partnerships. Acute care facilities in U.S. territories and freely associated states experience significant strains on capacity, driven by: Difficulty transitioning medically stable patients to the next appropriate level of care. Insufficient staff to meet patient needs. Limited transitional or extended care facilities. This creates a bottleneck that compromises the efficiency and stability of health systems. However, there are policy levers available to island jurisdictions that can support appropriate care for patients requiring institutional or home-based services and supports. These include payment flexibilities, workforce initiatives, and collaborative partnerships. Current State Infrastructure Island jurisdictions have limited hospital and long-term care (LTC) facility capacity. While many have government-run hospitals, three jurisdictions — American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), and Palau — have only one hospital, the Federated States of Micronesia has one hospital per state, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) each operate one hospital in both of their most populous islands. Additionally, Guam has just one Medicare-certified skilled nursing facility with 40 Medicare beds, operated by the Guam Memorial Hospital Authority, while Puerto Rico has nine Medicare-certified nursing homes for a population of more than three million people. Without LTC facility capacity, hospitals lack appropriate options for discharge. Geographic isolation, difficulties with recruitment and retention of sufficiently skilled staff (i.e., nursing staff), and supply chain challenges are additional obstacles to establishing and maintaining LTC capacity. Reimbursement Federal health care programs also influence the availability of LTC services in the territories. Medicare and Medicaid may cover LTC services under different circumstances; however, federal funding restrictions limit Medicaid in the territories compared to the states. Unlike the annually calculated, income-based Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) for states, the territories have a fixed FMAP. The current permanent FMAP for American Samoa, Guam, CNMI, and USVI is 83%, while Puerto Rico’s is 76% through FY2027. Medicaid funding for the territories also operates under a statutory cap allotment, meaning once the federal allotment is exhausted, the territory must cover all subsequent service costs with local funds. This frequently results in territories expending federal funding mid-year, which leads to service restrictions for residents and financial instability for providers. Finally, while the territories have additional financing restrictions, CNMI and American Samoa are able to operate their Medicaid programs under a special waiver authority. Policy Strategies A number of policy strategies may limit the strain on acute care facilities, address LTC needs, and support the provision of appropriate levels of care in island jurisdictions: Workforce Development Recruitment and retention of health care workers is a challenge in island jurisdictions, but public health and rural health care workforce strategies may help address staffing needs and capacity. Encourage employers and educational institutions to partner with local colleges, vocational schools, and community centers to develop apprenticeship programs and formal career pathways that support skills development, professional advancement, and patient and community needs. Identify available educational programs across the region to support a pipeline for students entering medical, nursing, pharmacy, and behavioral health careers. Promote and support dedicated in person recruitment opportunities as well as broader strategies that support local candidates and students. Develop cross-jurisdictional workforce agreements that allow training completed in one island jurisdiction to be recognized in another. Explore workforce training opportunities through commissions (e.g., Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education), universities (e.g., the Pacific Islands Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program), and public health associations (e.g., Equipping Community Health Workers to Address Alzheimer’s) as well as curriculum exchange and workgroups (e.g., USAPI Health Workforce Development Technical Working Group). Support partnerships among island jurisdictions to share resources and learnings related to facility development, financial models, and reimbursement strategies. For public employers, decentralize HR functions to create a more efficient hiring process. For jurisdictions with professional schools and programs, develop additional training models (i.e., short-term or extended rural placements) or blended learning. Medicaid and Other Federal Health Programs U.S. territories can also consider Medicaid policies that encourage community supports over institutional care or pursue other program flexibilities through waivers or state plan amendments. For example, states and territories can provide Home and Community-Based Services and use different authorities to achieve their policy goals. Implementing a Section 1115 demonstration allows for significant flexibility but must be budget neutral. In addition, the Money Follows the Person demonstration supports community-based services over institutional care. CMS awarded time-limited planning grants to Puerto Rico and American Samoa for this initiative. Additionally, the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly helps older adults remain at home and offers comprehensive medical and social services to eligible individuals. Supported Care Transitions Several models support patients moving from hospital to home to control chronic conditions, limit readmissions and emergency department visits, reduce costs, and improve outcomes overall. This includes the Care Transitions Intervention, a short-term training program for patients and caregivers to navigate the move home. The coach’s credentials are flexible and can include nurses, social workers, community health workers, or other professionals. Meanwhile, the Transitional Care Model, provides ongoing care management and is led by an advanced practice nurse. Collaboration Strategic partnerships can drive policies that support healthy aging or aging in place. For example, USVI established a commission on aging, while Guam enacted a senior citizens housing task force, both with multi-sector representation. And in December 2025, American Samoa’s Governor issued an Executive Order establishing a Home and Community-Based Services Commission as part of its Money Follows the Person plan, which includes representatives from a number of governmental agencies and areas of expertise. Legislation Island legislatures have also explored strategies that support older adults and those with complex health care needs and their families: Guam (No. 31-38 (COR)) would establish a regulatory framework for assisted living facilities with the goal of facilitating their development and operation. In 2023, USVI 35-0119 authorized mobile integrated health programs to leverage health care personnel for in-home services and prevent costly hospital readmissions. CNMI considered a resolution to explore several policy strategies, including leveraging Medicaid flexibilities, and prioritizing collaboration and financial support to meet the needs of elderly residents. In 2026, Puerto Rico enacted legislation to improve access to information about the benefits and services available to older adults. Reviewed by - Baker-White, Kearly, Sands Leavitt, Wheatley article yes

Overcoming Common Barriers to Data Linkage

ASTHO, with support from CDC, launched the first cohort of the Linking Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and Clinical Outcomes Data Multi-Jurisdiction Learning Community in October 2021. This brief examines themes that emerged from conversations in the learning community about the challenges encountered during data linking activities and discussed lessons they learned.

Successes from the Suicide and Opioid Overdose Prevention Public Health Initiative

Discover how Colorado, Maine, and New York used data-driven strategies to lower suicide and opioid overdose rates.

State and Territorial Environmental Health Directors (SEHD)

State and Territorial Environmental Health Directors (SEHD) The State and Territorial Environmental Health Directors (SEHD) peer group is an organized peer network within ASTHO whose membership includes environmental health leadership from U.S. state, territorial, and freely associated state health agencies. These leaders direct and oversee programs including but not limited to food and water safety, built environment, vector-borne disease, tattoo and body art, toxicology, and environmental epidemiology. Originally convened in 2005, the SEHD peer group strives to advance the practice of environmental public health with the following goals: Develop a national identity and unified voice for state environmental public health practice. Enhance relationships and communication among states and partners. Provide a forum for discussing key and emerging environmental health issues. ASTHO regularly engages the SEHD peer group through monthly calls, regional calls, and the SEHD Annual Meeting. The calls provide opportunities for SEHDs to discuss best practices, new initiatives in their jurisdictions, and major topics of interest. Each year, the SEHD Annual Meeting convenes the peer group to enhance capacity and build partnerships for environmental health programs in the jurisdictions. The meeting aims to increase knowledge of current and emerging environmental health topics through presentations and roundtable discussions, as well as strengthen peer-to-peer relationships through networking and resource sharing opportunities. To learn more about the SEHD peer group, please email the Environmental Health team at environmentalhealth@astho.org. article

Braiding and Layering Funding Resources

Braiding and Layering Funding Resources Communities face a wide range of needs, from food and housing access to transportation and beyond, and no single funding stream is typically built to address them all. Braiding and layering funding, the practice of combining multiple funding streams to support a common initiative, allows state and territorial health agencies to assemble the resources needed to meet diverse community needs comprehensively and sustainably. The white papers on this page highlight case examples and provide best practices for using braiding and layering strategies to achieve sustainable funding. website no

Opportunities and Strategies for Tobacco Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic

While the COVID-19 response has strained tobacco prevention and control efforts, the pandemic has afforded health officials unique opportunities to retool their tobacco prevention response. This brief spotlights new findings on tobacco use and COVID-19, opportunities for tobacco prevention during the pandemic, guidance for communicating risk, and recommendations for engaging state health officials.

Creating a Shared Approach to Suicide and Overdose Prevention

In the United States, suicide and overdose are among the top 10 leading causes of death. At the intersection of suicide and overdose are shared factors that can be assessed to support a comprehensive approach to prevention. The COVID-19 pandemic has created additional stress on communities and individuals, straining resources and exacerbating the suicide and overdose epidemics. This infographic is a tool that can assist states and territories in fostering cross-sector partnerships by demonstrating the intersection of suicide and overdose and how a multi-sector approach can lead to comprehensive prevention. This infographic also reminds us that we can build healthy and supportive communities together, in a strategic and unified way.

Improving Youth Behavioral Health Through School-Based Strategies

ACEs,

The findings detailed in this report were gathered during a series of School Behavioral Health Advisory Committee convenings in spring 2021. The goal was identify policy gaps and strategies for delivering behavioral health services in schools. Final recommendations include: develop shared communication and vision; enhance state-cross sector partnerships; use data driven action; and implement innovative policies to improve access to services

Eliminating Structural Racism to Achieve Health Equity Policy Academy

The Eliminating Structural Racism to Achieve Health Equity Policy Academy fosters the development of governmental workforce policy development skills and boundary spanning leadership to advance policy, systems, and workforce changes to achieve health equity.

Innovative Partnerships for Adverse Childhood Experiences Prevention

ACEs,

Innovative Partnerships for Adverse Childhood Experiences Prevention Collaboration and coordination with stakeholders are essential to amplifying state and territorial health agency injury and violence prevention (IVP) programs to prevent adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and achieve community health impact. While collaboration often occurs through one-on- one partnerships, state IVP programs play a critical convening role, bringing multiple stakeholders together to address ACEs prevention more holistically. In basic form, partnerships among stakeholders yield general support for shared initiatives, but they become increasingly meaningful when resources — data, funding, training, and staff — are shared or exchanged. Get the Resource (PDF) article yes

Navigating Public Health Planning with Precision and Purpose

Navigating Public Health Planning with Precision and Purpose Discover examples and best practices for developing strategic plans that enhance community health outcomes. Embarking on the journey of public health planning demands more than good intentions. It requires a meticulous blueprint that encompasses budgetary considerations and strategic timelines, and effectively leverages external support. Across a landscape in which every decision has the potential to uplift entire communities, there are a world of opportunities and details to explore. Included among them are the critical components of crafting a robust plan, the value of engaging contractors, and strategies for optimizing resources. Mining Existing Plans for Insight and Inspiration Organizational strategic plans, Community Health Assessments (CHAs), and Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) can supply guidance and inspiration for comprehensive public health planning. These documents offer both valuable insights into public health initiatives and tangible examples of effective planning frameworks. There are multiple examples of existing plans within health agencies across jurisdictions; when seeking them out, consider various criteria (e.g., population characteristics, geographic location, and specific health priorities). By examining plans tailored to communities with similar demographics or facing comparable health challenges, planners can apply approaches that resonate in their own context. Additionally, understanding the distinctions between strategic plans, CHAs, and CHIPs is essential, particularly for agencies aspiring towards PHAB Pathways Recognition Program or PHAB Accreditation. These plans are separate entities within the PHAB framework, each playing a vital role in shaping public health strategies and fostering community well-being. Strategic Plans Strategic plans outline organizational goals, plans to achieve them, and how to measure success. They drive resource allocation, decision-making, and other priorities organization wide. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Hawaii Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Community Health Assessments Community health assessments offer a complete view of risks, resources, and factors influencing outcomes. Supported by diverse environmental and socio-economic data, CHAs inform health policy, staff protocols, partnerships, program development, funding, resource allocation, and health improvement planning. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Oneida Nation* Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Pierce County, WA* Community Health Improvement Plans Community Health Improvement Plans are strategic, collaborative roadmaps derived from CHAs. They outline how health agencies, partners, and communities will unite to enhance overall health. They guide priorities, resource allocation, and steer project, program, and policy implementation. Examples U.S. Virgin Islands Hawaii Oneida Nation* Forest County Potawatomi* El Paso County, CO* San Joaquin County, CA* Pierce County, WA* *PHAB Accredited Health Department Plan Components, Timeline, and Budget Agencies considering planning processes and examples from other jurisdictions should recognize the diversity in approaches across different agencies and jurisdictions. There truly isn’t a singular “right” way to undertake public health planning. Instead, it’s about tailoring the process to suit the jurisdiction’s unique needs and circumstances. Examples to Guide Plan Development The Kansas Institute of Health’s Strategic Planning in the Public Health Sector Handbook offers a comprehensive breakdown of planning elements and timeframes based on a six-month plan development calendar. Explore Minnesota Department of Health’s Community Health Assessment and Planning Toolkit, a rich resource for navigating the CHA-CHIP process and timeline. Their template includes a detailed approach that considers capacity to accomplish each step within a desired timeline. Given the variation in the depth and breadth of jurisdiction planning processes, it is challenging to pinpoint a specific dollar amount to cover a planning endeavor. NACCHO’s MAPP Budget Template (part of their downloadable MAPP 2.0 process) can help systematically think through the resources necessary for planning processes. Outsourcing Key Support External support—in the form of facilitators, contractors, or other specialized professionals—can play a pivotal role in enhancing public health planning by offering fresh insights, innovative strategies, and diverse perspectives. Such support also allows for full, active organizational participation in the planning process. Moreover, they can provide valuable technical assistance, helping to navigate complex challenges and identify best practices from other contexts. By harnessing external support, organizations can optimize their decision-making processes, foster collaboration, and enhance the delivery of services to communities, thereby promoting better health outcomes for all. Conducting a SWOT Analysis: Contractors can assist in facilitating a thorough analysis of the organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT). This structured assessment helps identify internal factors that impact the organization's ability to achieve its objectives and external factors that may affect its operations. Proposing Strategic Priorities: Based on the SWOT analysis and input from stakeholders, contractors can help planning teams crystallize priorities aligned with the organization's mission and vision. These priorities serve as the foundation for developing the plan. Facilitating Steering Committee Meetings: Steering committee meetings are crucial for decision-making and guiding the strategic planning process. External facilitators can lead these meetings, ensuring productive discussions, consensus-building, and alignment with organizational goals. Developing Components of the Strategic Plan: Contractors can support in drafting or reviewing various components of the plan, including vision and mission statements, goals, objectives, and action plans. They may ensure these components are clear, concise, and aligned with the overarching strategic direction. Developing a Draft Implementation Plan: An implementation plan outlines how to achieve strategic goals, including timelines, responsible parties, and resource allocation. Contractors can support an organization to develop a draft implementation plan that outlines actionable steps to translate the strategic plan into reality. Developing Quality Improvement Metrics: Contractors can assist in guiding the development of metrics to measure the effectiveness of the strategic plan. These metrics should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART), providing a framework for monitoring progress and making data-driven decisions. Conducting Training Among Organization Staff: To ensure buy-in and understanding of the strategic plan and process itself, contractors can help develop and co-facilitate training sessions for staff members. These sessions may cover strategic objectives, action plans, and their roles in achieving organizational goals. Developing a Communication Plan: Effective communication is an essential key for keeping any strategic plan off the shelf. Contractors can support an organization in developing a comprehensive communication plan that outlines key messages, target audiences, communication channels, and timelines to ensure consistent and transparent communication throughout the organization and with partners. Developing Process Logs, Templates, and Meeting Notes: Contractors can create documentation tools such as process logs, templates for strategic planning documents, and detailed meeting notes. These resources streamline the planning process, capture important discussions and decisions, and serve as valuable references when considering sustainability. In summary, external support brings valuable expertise and resources to public health planning processes, enabling organizations to navigate complexities, engage partners effectively, and develop actionable strategic plans that drive positive health outcomes for communities. OE22-2203 PHIG website yes