Displaying 1-20 of 27 results for

This toolkit is designed to support public health leaders in leveraging the policy development process to achieve health equity in their jurisdiction.

Health providers have widely used telehealth to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 infection and to improve access to healthcare services thanks in large part to policy changes and regulations. This brief explores how state and territorial health agencies (S/THAs) are responding to COVID-19 through telehealth policy and operational changes, as well as how telehealth has quickly emerged as a tool to improve health equity.

An issue brief by ASTHO and the Duke University Margolis Center for Health Policy that highlights considerations for state health officials as they look to maximize the benefits of COVID-19 therapeutics.

Healthy People 2030 charts the course for public health over the next decade. In this episode, public health leaders share their perspectives about where state and territorial health agencies intersect with Healthy People 2030 and why it should be treated as a "North Star" in public health.

A mid-session legislative update on five of ASTHO's top 10 public health state policy issues to watch in 2023: data privacy and modernization, reproductive health, health equity, strengthening public health agencies, and immunization.

Supporting policies that reduce HIV stigma and promote health equity is an important public health issue.

This ASTHOBrief contains three key recommendations for improving the 2013 CDC/CSTE Cancer Cluster Investigation Guidelines.

Reprioritizing Black Maternal Health How We Can Prioritize Black Maternal Health Lawrence Young Black women face significant rates of maternal morbidity and mortality — learn how public health can better support them in this blog post. I do not have to look far to understand the urgency of the Black maternal health crisis. I have watched friends, colleagues, and loved ones from every walk of life struggle through pregnancies that should have been safe and celebrated. Some are highly educated professionals. Others are young mothers still finding their way. Many had access to quality insurance and still faced complications, long hospital stays, and minimal follow-up care. Many have shared unfortunate experiences that run the gamut from feeling unheard or perhaps unnecessarily undergoing a procedure — the care in health care was not there for them. These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a larger, structural failure that demands our attention and our action. As public health professionals, we must ask ourselves: How can we better care for and about Black mothers? And what would it look like to center them in the systems that were created to protect women in one of the most vulnerable times of their lives? Understanding the Root of the Crisis Black women in the United States are three to four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their White counterparts. In many states, including Connecticut, this difference persists even when controlling for education and income. These outcomes are not the result of individual choices or biological differences — they are the result of systems designed with historical blind spots. Education and income, often seen as protective factors, do not shield Black women from these outcomes. Research shows that pregnancy-related mortality rates are higher among Black women with a college degree than among White women with the same level of education or with less than a high school diploma. The same is true for women with respect to the risk of dying within the first year postpartum. These disparities grow with age and extend beyond mortality to include severe maternal morbidity, such as preeclampsia — a pregnancy complication related to high blood pressure — which can have lasting health impacts if untreated including death. Additionally, American Indian, Alaska Native, Black, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Asian, and Hispanic women all experience higher rates of ICU admission during delivery compared to White women. ICU admission is considered a key marker for maternal complications and system-level failure. Public Health as Partner in Progress Public health has a responsibility to do more than document issues and concerns. We must be in the business of addressing them. In Connecticut, we are working across agencies and community organizations to move from acknowledgment to action. One of the most important leaders in this work is #Day43, an initiative launched by Waterbury Bridge to Success Community Partnership. The name refers to the period between 43 days and one year postpartum, during which approximately 20% of pregnancy-related deaths occur. #Day43 exists to raise awareness of Black maternal health and transform systems to support mothers. Their work spans research, advocacy, policy, technical assistance, and storytelling grounded in lived experience. Waterbury’s maternal health data reflects this crisis. According to the #Day43 Black Maternal Health Report, 18.6% of pregnant women in Waterbury received late or no prenatal care. Those in the city face higher rates of C-sections, limited access to postpartum care, and insufficient support for mental health and breastfeeding. The community described a significant lack of maternity care resources, particularly in the North End, where many Black and Hispanic families reside. Through initiatives like this, residents are not just seen as stakeholders. They are recognized as storytellers, system builders, and agents of change. Their leadership is shaping how we define, measure, and deliver maternal care in Connecticut. This vision aligns with broader maternal health equity efforts across the state. For example, The Connecticut Health Foundation is developing a Maternal Health Equity Blueprint in partnership with community leaders, researchers, and families. Waterbury voices are essential contributors to this process. Listening as a Path of Healing The experiences of Black mothers reflect a broader truth. Too often, our systems are not built to hear them. That lack of trust is both historical and current. It shows up in rushed appointments, dismissed symptoms, and inaccessible services. Community-based providers, such as doulas and midwives of color, are critical to bridging this gap. They do more than provide care — they restore dignity. Yet these providers are often underfunded and undervalued in mainstream health care systems. Public health must champion integrating these providers into existing systems and promoting long-term sustainability. To maximize maternal health outcomes, the next phase of this work must intentionally include structured cross-sector collaboration. It must focus on building systems that educate both providers and families on urgent maternal warning signs, provide consistent discharge education, and strengthen local surveillance and outreach infrastructure. These strategies are essential, scalable, and lifesaving. We cannot improve outcomes without acknowledging the deep cultural, emotional, and psychological work required to rebuild trust. We cannot heal what we do not hear. Re-Examining the “Public” in Public Health Re-examining the public in public health means placing the needs of our most vulnerable communities at the center. It means investing in care that is integrative and supportive with community co-designed solutions. It also means wholistically addressing other intersecting systems that influence maternal outcomes. We can start by: Expanding funding for community-based perinatal health workers, including doulas and midwives. Embedding relevant metrics into maternal health program design and evaluation. Creating statewide listening sessions and family advisory councils to ensure policies reflect lived realities. Partnering across sectors to improve access to safe housing, transportation, and mental health supports for new mothers. Supporting local initiatives like #Day43 that lead from within communities and reflect community-defined solutions. Educating families on health information and individual health rights through accessible, trusted channels. To truly care for and about Black mothers, we must act beyond awareness months and social media campaigns. We must improve current processes and design opportunities that will support them and keep them alive. Public health was created to serve the public. The most powerful way to honor that mission is to focus on the public, ensuring they are a priority and not an afterthought. article yes

Although suicide was a critical public health issue in the U.S. long before the COVID-19 pandemic began, Americans are now reporting increased mental health challenges like depression, anxiety, and suicidal behaviors. In addition, millions have experienced financial hardships, social isolation and loneliness, and increased stress—all of which are shared risk factors for mental health conditions, suicidal behaviors, and substance misuse. State public health officials have taken bold action over the past 12 months to mitigate the physical impacts of COVID-19, and the same swift action should be applied to mitigate the acute and potential long-term mental health, suicide, and substance use impacts. The National Response’s "An Action Plan for Strengthening Mental Health and Prevention of Suicide in the Aftermath of COVID-19" provides a roadmap for addressing the mental health, suicide prevention, and substance misuse prevention needs spurred by COVID-19.

During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, temporarily expanding the use of telehealth technologies by removing various requirements and waiving certain restrictions. Many states also expanded telehealth access through changes to state Medicaid laws. These temporary policy changes created an uptick of telehealth use that improved access to care for millions of Americans—but questions remain about which policy changes will stick around beyond the pandemic. Currently, states are making decisions about what temporary policies to permanently implement and which policies to end without disrupting the delivery of care and further exacerbating health disparities.

The ASTHO State Health Policy team provides brief updates on 5 of the ten state health policy issues to watch in 2022: mental and behavioral health, rural health, e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products, HIV and PFAS.

Flavored tobacco policy has changed rapidly over the past few months. In April, FDA announced their intention to implement rules prohibiting the sale of menthol e-cigarettes and flavored cigars, though it may take years until they implement a final rule. And in 2021, 15 states and Washington, D.C. considered legislation prohibiting the sale of some or all flavored tobacco products. However the tobacco industry has seen success recently in obstructing the legislative efforts of states in this area.

Description (ideally 120-160 characters)

An increasing body of research finds racism can have a significant impact across one’s lifespan. Research shows that persistent exposure to racial discrimination may result in premature aging, poor health outcomes, and increased prevalence of certain chronic diseases. At every level of government, policymakers are seeking to acknowledge the systemic oppression of people of color that persists and to elevate racism as an urgent public health crisis comparable to other public health emergencies.

The 2020 holiday season is coinciding with a nationwide surge of COVID-19 cases. With great concern that holiday travel to see loved ones may exacerbate community spread of the virus, many states are increasing public health measures before the winter holiday season. As of November 16, 2020, 13 states and D.C. had a quarantine requirement for out-of-state travelers. The U.S. territories also have instituted travel restrictions to limit the spread of COVID-19.

Policy Trends Shaping Access to Care in 2026 Policy Trends Shaping Access to Care in 2026 Learn about policy trends shaping access to care in 2026, including supporting community health workers and improving rural health care. Public health agencies have a role in supporting access to care, which means assuring timely access to covered health care services provided by a qualified workforce. However, many communities experience challenges in accessing health care services, providers, facilities, or affordable care. Gaps in access to services that prevent chronic disease, address maternal health and behavioral health challenges, and other health goals undermine public health’s ability to improve community health. Strategies to improve access to care can include focused attention on underserved or at-risk communities or populations, including rural populations. To support access to comprehensive health care services, state legislatures continue to explore laws that strengthen clinical and community-based health workforces, support rural health care facilities, and promote access to care across the lifespan, including for women. Access to Supportive and Community-Based Health Services Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health workers who serve as a link between health and social services and the community, and can help address the social and behavioral health drivers of health outcomes. Many jurisdictions pursued policies to support CHWs by defining the workforce, establishing training or certification programs, and pursuing financial sustainability including through Medicaid programs. In 2025, more than a dozen states considered legislation related to CHWs, with several states enacting laws that recognize CHWs as providers and/or authorize Medicaid coverage and reimbursement. This includes Arkansas HB 1258, which establishes a state certification for CHWs, defines their role, and requires compensation for certified CHW services from both Medicaid and certain regulated health plans in the state. Montana (HB 850) and Oklahoma (SB 424) enacted bills to regulate CHWs but both bills were vetoed by their respective governors. In Oklahoma, the legislature overrode the veto. Rhode Island (S 0705) considered legislation that would require regulated health plans to cover CHW services, and Virginia enacted SB 981 which requires the health department to report on the status of the CHW workforce and future needs. Doulas are non-medical professionals who support individuals during pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum period. Doula care has been shown to reduce the rate of both cesarean sections and postpartum anxiety or depression, and may be cost effective, particularly for Medicaid programs. A majority of states are either pursuing or already offering doula coverage in their Medicaid programs. At least fourteen jurisdictions considered legislation in 2025 to recognize or provide coverage of doula services by Medicaid programs or private insurance. At least six states enacted laws regarding Medicaid coverage of doulas, including Louisiana (HB 454), Montana (SB 319), Utah (SB 284), and Vermont (S 53). In Maine, LD 1523 directs the health department to begin the rate development process for future coverage of doula services, establish a doula council to support that process and provide other advice to the department, and issue a report on the overall progress by February 2027. Arkansas (HB 1252) established a scope of practice for certified community-based doulas and requires compensation by both the Medicaid program and other health benefit plans in the state. Stabilizing and Growing Rural Health Care Access Rural communities face a number of health care challenges, including limited health care providers and financial strain on hospitals and other rural health care facilities. Several states explored strategic initiatives to support rural health care access, both broadly and for specific populations. California enacted SB 338 which establishes a virtual health hub to expand access to health services for farmworkers in rural communities. Iowa enacted HF 972, directing the health department to seek CMS approval for a hub-and-spoke model to support the state’s rural health providers. Finally, Texas enacted HB 18 which creates a rural hospital officers academy to support the education and development of these leaders, includes additional financial support for rural hospitals with obstetrics and gynecology services, and codifies current state programs and offices supporting rural hospitals. More than a third of U.S. counties are considered maternal care deserts, which are places where there are no obstetric providers or facilities. Several states enacted legislation to expand access to pregnancy and maternal health care in rural and underserved areas, including California which enacted SB 669 to create a pilot program for five rural hospitals to provide perinatal services on a standby basis. Arizona (HB 2332) will establish an advisory committee to make recommendations that will ensure the availability of “obstetrics, gynecology and maternal mental health services in low-volume, high-risk rural communities.” And in Connecticut, the governor signed several bills aimed at increasing access to maternal health care, including HB 7102 which requires the development of a strategic plan to increase the number of obstetric facilities in underserved areas of the state. Leg Prospectus-2026 - Access - Rural Health Expanding Support for Mid-Life Women's Health Care Women may experience a number of disruptive symptoms during perimenopause — the transition period before menopause — including difficulty sleeping, memory lapses, hot flashes, and general pain and discomfort. Following menopause, low hormone levels can increase the risk of chronic diseases like osteoporosis, heart disease, and stroke. Lack of knowledge about menopause and its wide range of symptoms, along with stigma, can prevent women from seeking treatment or other supports. Recognizing a growing need to address women's health across the entire lifespan, not just the reproductive years, state legislatures are exploring laws that address the menopause transition and its impacts through education and tailored health care access. In 2025, several jurisdictions — including Texas (HB 3961), Arizona (HB 2734), and Connecticut (AB 6593) — considered legislation directing the development, coordination, or distribution of educational programs and resources on menopause or perimenopause for women or providers, with Maine (LD 1079) enacting a measure requiring the health department to work to create and disseminate informational materials on perimenopause and menopause. Several other states have explored insurance coverage requirements, including New Jersey (A 5278/S 4148) and New York (A 5444) that would require certain health insurers and plans to cover menopausal and perimenopausal care and treatment. California (AB 432) would have required prescription coverage of drugs relevant to perimenopause and menopause care and treatment, and incentivize menopause-specific education for physicians, but the governor vetoed the bill and called for the state health and human services agency to propose policy changes for next year’s budget that address concerns about cost. Looking Ahead ASTHO expects states and territories to continue considering policies related to access to care, including legislation that: Increases coverage of and access to community-based health professionals like doulas, CHWs, and peer support specialists. Improves access to over-the-counter contraception. Recognizes telehealth's role in the health care system to ensure continued access to remote health care, particularly in rural communities. Supports access to reproductive care and women’s health services across the lifespan, including additional funding or other flexibilities to address anticipated changes in the federal funding landscape (e.g., Title X). OE22-2203 PHIG article yes

Policymakers seek to prevent the spread of COVID-19 by focusing on non-congregate sheltering and alternative housing for unhoused populations.

Infusing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Into State Public Health Agencies: Perspectives from Connecticut, New York, and Tennessee Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, diversity equity inclusion, public health, public health agencies, connecticut and new York, tennessee and new York, public health workforce, equitable access to care, health equity, access to care, share resources, diverse executives, delph scholars, leadership development, implement dei, health agencies, office of multicultural health equity, advisory council, racial equity, human rights, health and mental hygiene, board of health, anti racism, department of health, addressing dei, health disparities, political landscape Samia Hussein, Erika Kirtz, Jannae Parrott ASTHO | DELPH Scholars share insights on creating an inclusive and equitable workplace in public health agencies from Connecticut, New York, and Tennessee perspectives. A diverse public health workforce is essential for organizations to offer equitable access to care and address the many social and political factors affecting health. Public health agencies are most robust when they mirror the diversity of the communities they serve, as this enables them to access and share resources with the community and other stakeholders more easily through established connections. Therefore, infusing Diversity, Equity, and inclusion (DEI) into multiple levels of state and local public health agencies is vital. In a LinkedIn Study, 76% of employees indicated that diversity is essential when considering a job, and 80% of survey respondents indicated they want to work for a company that values diversity. With the recent resignation wave hitting many state and local public health agencies, the need for authentic attraction of new employees who share our DEI values is more urgent than ever. It is time for public health practitioners to transform the systems to be more inclusive and structured to provide the necessary resources and interventions to all individuals, especially the most vulnerable. As Diverse Executives Leading in Public Health (DELPH) Scholars, we value this DEI conversation centered around equity within the workplace. Our leadership development program has allowed us to connect with others working on this same effort nationwide. Together, we have learned valuable lessons as we implement DEI at our health agencies and are eager to share them with you. This collective effort and shared purpose drive us in our DEI journey. State Perspectives on Addressing DEI Connecticut: Samia Hussein The Office of Multicultural Health Equity (OMHE) was established in 1996 as an appointed office by the then Commissioner to create health equity programs and initiatives that address our staff and client needs, including establishing our Statewide Multicultural Advisory Council (MCAC). Recently, in Connecticut, the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and the Commission on Racial Equity in Public Health co-hosted a statewide symposium titled “Cementing Equity in State Government” that launched the results of two fundamental equity studies across the state. The studies are a result of legislation passed declaring racism a public health crisis. The first step in our DEI journey was to ensure a foundation of definitions, terms, and a safe space for dialogue around shared experiences, which can lead to culture change. This was accomplished through buy-in from leadership by consulting with a full-service DEI agency, Kaleidoscope Group, based in Chicago. The Commissioner, Executive Leadership Team, and Union Leadership collaborated in offering this mandatory full-day DEI training to our entire agency (~3400 staff). OMHE and MCAC create a shared three-year strategic plan that is a vehicle for making a substantial DEI impact (e.g., reviewing health inequities) and provides recommendations for the Commissioner through programs/initiatives and policy changes. It is imperative to collaborate with multiple internal and external stakeholders to have a pulse on DEI issues. This existing infrastructure allowed OMHE to oversee this training mandate and continue advancing DEI programs statewide. Our preliminary data for DEI training has shown that nearly 80% of staff reported the training as a worthwhile investment, and 82.1% strongly agree that they will apply the knowledge and skills learned from the training at their workplace. We continue to look at client data points for behavioral health inequities and address DEI concerns collaboratively. New York: Jannae Parrott The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) has embraced a proactive and inclusive strategy to tackle DEI by prioritizing integrating health equity and anti-racism throughout the agency. This work is primarily supported and driven by the New York City Board of Health resolution declaring racism a public health crisis. At DOHMH, the first step was to launch an agency-wide initiative to empower staff with the knowledge and tools to effectively address racial health disparities and enhance health outcomes for all New Yorkers. This initiative involves educating and training staff on how racism and other oppressive systems can impact healthcare, analyzing how racism may have influenced our past work, establishing new policies to mitigate such influences, and collaborating with local communities to explore additional strategies for combating systemic injustice. DOHMH will soon launch a new data equity skills training course to engage staff at all levels in applying practical data equity skills. Its objectives include fostering awareness of the importance of data equity, providing tools and training for people who work with data to enhance equity in data practices, and offering resources for staff involved in data-informed decision-making. Additionally, DOHMH has initiated comprehensive internal reforms aimed at dismantling silos and modernizing our data systems. This transformative process enables the agency to advance the linkage of public health, healthcare, and social service data, ultimately enhancing our understanding and efforts to improve population health. Tennessee: Erika Kirtz The Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) has been strategic in its approach to addressing DEI in the state. We have shifted our language to focus on eliminating disparities, which is the central focus of our equity work. A key priority is overcoming limitations in our data and surveillance systems to detect disparities in vulnerable populations better. Offices within TDH are linking multiple datasets to gather demographics and risk factors to understand how to serve the populations best. For example, the Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance (HAI/AR) program in TDH has implemented processes to link surveillance datasets to secondary data sources (inpatient and outpatient hospital discharge data, etc.) to gather information on demographics that aid in the understanding of risk factors associated with the acquisition of certain multi-drug resistant organisms. The findings from this data linkage allow the team to pinpoint risk factors that can be overcome with targeted interventions. We have also begun breaking down silos to collaborate across offices and divisions on the various equity-related initiatives. The overall goal is to transform the current systems to operate through an equity lens, which will be standard practice throughout TDH. There is also a push to continue diversifying the workforce by actively recruiting interns and staff from local Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and other institutions with minority populations. The TDH’s central office is in Nashville, TN, near two prominent HBCUs: Tennessee State University and Meharry Medical College. TDH staff have attended job fairs and specifically sent notifications to faculty at these institutions to help recruit for internships, fellowships, and employment. TDH’s approach is to remove the negative stigma around the term equity, which allows our department to continue serving the people of Tennessee. Call to Action The work of DEI can be challenging, and there is no specific blueprint for addressing it. However, we want to share key takeaways and lessons from this process. It is imperative to have leadership buy-in and support early in the process. The work will not be prioritized if it does not start with the Commissioner and the Executive Leadership Team. Also, this process is not one-size-fits-all and requires a clear vision. The first step is establishing a clear baseline of health equity measures to assess progress continuously. Guidance from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation can assist in measuring equity in your state. Review what other agencies are doing to adopt best practices that can be applied to your agency. Please note that this process is not for one person and requires a diverse and dedicated team to champion this work. This process requires financial investment through consulting, training, or hiring core staff. There will be many people who are resistant to change or critical of this work. Remember the why and the importance of these practices. Use data to support decisions and stick to the strategies or action plans that lead to success. Also, identify key partners committed to this work and use each other to overcome challenges. Understanding the political landscape and concerns these initiatives might evoke is vital. These concerns can be overcome by being proactive in communicating the benefits and importance of this work, building relationships and awareness of social inequities, and inviting all employees to play a role in advocating for the advancement of DEI. When considering diversity and inclusion, we must think beyond gender, race, and ethnicity. Consider understanding the makeup of the diverse communities served. Expand upon client and staff demographic data. Even if the Federal and State

This blog post discusses mitigating risks of AI use in government agencies, emphasizing privacy, transparency, and ethical concerns.

Suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States and widely recognized as a crisis, specifically among our youth, a population in which incidences have been rapidly increasing. Fortunately, suicide prevention and mental health support are issues that benefit from bipartisan support.