Displaying 1-20 of 110 results for

Learn how territorial and freely associated state health agencies can support community health workers and their vital work in this brief.

Collecting and sharing data are crucially important to improving health equity, because those datasets inform effective policymaking. Despite having some of the most challenging population health outcomes, the U.S. island areas are often absent within federal public health datasets.Federal, island, and nonprofit partners should prioritize efforts to increase their inclusion.

Learn how increasing the use of indirect cost rates in the territories and freely associated states can help improve public health financing in these jurisdictions.

Establishing an Office of Health Equity or Minority Health Learn how to establish, structure, and fund a health equity or minority health office. A dedicated office of health equity or minority health can provide a focus on cross-cutting efforts and strategies that help to improve services, outreach, and engagement with marginalized communities. This report delves into the typical scope for setting up a health equity or minority health office, including how to establish, structure, and fund it—providing a blueprint to island areas working to build one or considering establishing one in the future. In addition, it explores lessons learned from state offices of health equity or minority health, including California, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington. Get the Report (PDF) website yes

Centralizing Administrative Functions, with Lessons Learned from Guam Megan Drake-Pereyra Centralizing administrative functions, such as procurement or grants management, is a strategy many organizations utilize. Having administrative functions concentrated with a specific team rather than dispersed or managed within separate teams can work well. There is potential for standardized processes and procedures, increased efficiency and quality, more control and accountability, and consistent data collection and monitoring. This brief details how health departments can utilize existing, evidence-based frameworks to centralize administrative functions and build off lessons learned from others, such as the Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services (Guam DPHSS). Getting Started Considerations When transitioning from a decentralized structure to a centralized structure, it is important to clearly outline the what, why, how, and benefits. Consider the following components to kickstart success: Leadership vision: Start with the leader’s visionary perspective. When the leader allocates sufficient time and consistently reinforces the vision, it allows for the necessary decisions, trust, and support to be established during the transition. Data-driven design: Use data and existing information, such as current standard operating procedures or process diagrams, to understand the decentralized process differences/similarities, and guide effective centralized processes and procedures. Role clarity: Clearly outline and define the new centralized infrastructure, purpose, roles, responsibilities, expectations, and procedures. This helps everyone understand and follow the new processes more consistently, with better results. Performance measures: Establish and use performance measures from the outset (e.g., team knowledge, skills, competency, process time and quality, outcomes, impact, etc.), for insight into the value, or return on investment, of the centralized model. This will help indicate the quantity, quality, and impact of programs/processes. Documentation: Capture and share decisions, vision, goals, structure, standard operating procedures, and relevant details in writing for new team members and users of the centralized functions. Communication: Transparently share plans, timelines, and additional knowledge to maximize utilization and value. Additionally, anticipate and proactively address resistance to change to help everyone embrace and adhere to the new, centralized approach. The Plan-Do-Study-Act Method Change management, quality planning, and process improvement models can also support organizational and process change. For example, the quality improvement methodology, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA), offers an effective framework for centralizing administrative functions and complements many of the aforementioned considerations: Step one, plan, relies on leaders to decide the vision, scope, structure, roles/responsibilities, goals, and purpose of the centralized team. Here leaders establish and reinforce the leadership vision, using existing data to guide the design of the new centralized team. Step two, do, is dedicated to onboarding centralized team members, defining their work processes and procedures, and ensuring effective communication with all stakeholders. This requires thorough documentation and strong communications plans. Step three, study—an often overlooked but crucial building step—is for testing the processes, procedures, roles, and responsibilities, to confirm and build confidence that this centralized structure will yield the desired results. Performance measures provide clarity into what is working well and what is not. Step four, act, is for launching and rolling out the structure, ongoing monitoring of performance, and continuing to educate and coach for successful, sustainable improvements. Lessons Learned from Guam Guam DPHSS, a joint health and social services agency, is working to centralize its administrative functions to reduce inefficiencies and redundancies as well as improve quality and consistency. This has been a big change for Guam DPHSS, but leadership vision, documentation, role clarity, and communication have proven to be key throughout the process. In 2021, Guam DPHSS established a centralized Office of Grants Management (OGM). In its early stages, programmatic teams saw OGM as a regulatory body that would audit and direct their work, while OGM’s true objective was to provide support and ease administrative burden, allowing program staff to focus on accomplishing their goals and deliverables. By clarifying and documenting the vision, roles, and responsibilities as well as focusing on communication, the OGM built trust, addressed specific concerns, and established a shared vision of their role as supportive and helpful. In 2023, Guam DPHSS began the process of establishing a centralized Procurement Management Office (PMO). While Guam DPHSS reorganized and co-located staff into the new, centralized PMO, Guam was undergoing a governmentwide business process improvement (BPI) project focused on procurement—presenting an opportunity for Guam DPHSS to involve new PMO staff and other key DPHSS team members in improving its functions and centralizing the procurement process. Through the BPI project, which utilized PDSA, DPHSS clarified roles and responsibilities, defined work processes and procedures, and developed training and communications plans that supported process improvement and centralization of procurement functions. Guam DPHSS has learned many lessons throughout their journey to create a centralized OGM and PMO, including that change of this magnitude is hard—more specifically, balancing change management while ensuring maintenance of key operations. Ultimately, they found that the aforementioned considerations and methods for getting started were critical in supporting the change to centralized administrative functions. Establishing the Ideal Structure for Administrative Functions Determining if and how centralized administrative functions will work for an organization is multifaceted. An organization’s culture, size, infrastructure (including technology and systems), and workforce and skills all play crucial roles in shaping the ideal structure. The methods and considerations noted previously can help health departments determine and support the best path forward for each unique organization. ASTHO has several additional resources and tools that can support administrative change and improvement. Visit the ASTHO STAR Center to learn more. website yes

Strengthening Maternal and Infant Health Data in the U.S. Territories ASTHO, association of state and territorial health officials, maternal and infant health data, U.S. territories, public health, surveillance programs, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, improving the health, live births, health problems, reproductive health, federal government, toggle the centers for disease control and prevention cdc, risk assessment monitoring system, assessment monitoring system prams, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring, maternal and infant health, information collected, table of contents, population based, health status, supreme court, prams data, toggle the table, risk factors, prenatal care, collecting information Stephany Strahle The U.S. territories—Puerto Rico (PR), U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), and American Samoa—are largely excluded from most statistical data systems in the United States. This gap leaves island health leaders, national partners, and federal agencies without the surveillance necessary to inform timely and robust public health programs and policies. This is also seen in critical maternal and child health surveillance programs like the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), Maternal Mortality Review Committees, and the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, which either do not include or only recently included territories in their scope of coverage. This incomplete information creates challenges in identifying the aspects health systems need to address to reduce adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. Applying a life course perspective to maternal and infant health data reveals gaps in public health systems that impact outcomes before, during, and after birth. PRAMS provides vital insights into these lived experiences and pregnant people’s interactions with health care services. PRAMS data can also be linked to other administrative datasets, such as Medicaid, child welfare services, and Community Healthy Start programs, to provide a broader understanding of determinants of health across the life course for both the birthing parent and their child. With the breadth of contextual experiences that PRAMS captures in its data and the potential for data linkage projects to explore outcomes and their contributing factors, U.S. territories can leverage this wealth of information to assess the needs of their pregnant communities and their children. Despite its development in 1987, PRAMS has been implemented in only two territories, PR and CNMI, within the past decade. This brief highlights the work of these two islands and the potential to gain further insights into maternal and infant health outcomes using data linkage methods. Island Expansion of Maternal and Infant Health Surveillance Using PRAMS Since beginning PRAMS data collection in 2017, PR has made considerable strides in providing their communities with comprehensive reports on various topics. In 2021, one in eight live births was preterm in PR—the U.S. average is one in 10 live births. This outcome is one example of a potential research area in PR that could leverage PRAMS linkages to clinical administrative data sources to investigate contributing factors. In a special project conducted from 2016 to 2018, PRAMS served as an avenue for assessment of Zika awareness among pregnant people and their partners. Moreover, PRAMS informed numerous reports and educational materials on topics ranging from dental care to lactation and opioid use during pregnancy. Linking PRAMS to other administrative datasets could illuminate more information about health care utilization and access among pregnant people in PR. Although limited research exists on maternal and infant health outcomes in CNMI, available evidence reveals disparities in preterm birth among the territory’s indigenous Chamorro and Carolinian communities and Asian and Pacific Islander groups. Since CNMI started administering PRAMS in 2021, strong relationships with entities outside the territory (e.g., the Hawaii Department of Health) have facilitated PRAMS implementation by helping navigate Internal Review Board regulations and applications—both of which are necessary to conduct PRAMS collection and potential research using PRAMS data, like data linkage projects. Moreover, the CNMI PRAMS team’s deep familiarity with their communities could help identify local administrative data sources that, when linked to PRAMS, capture priority areas for improved health care and social service delivery. Considerations for Future Maternal and Infant Health Data Exploration With the existing gaps in surveillance data available for maternal and infant health, this recent implementation of PRAMS and the potential for data linkages to other data sources could provide enhanced insights for U.S. territories. The following considerations can inform best practices to optimize this data. Building Partnerships to Support a Linked Maternal and Infant Health Data Network To build capacity for further data exploration, building partnerships with other agencies and PRAMS jurisdictions can facilitate the information-sharing necessary to navigate data use agreements and other considerations before successfully linking data. Leveraging these connections can also supply more avenues to administer educational tools about PRAMS and perinatal services, linking their pregnant populations to the services they need. A robust web of partnerships can create a network of linked data capturing the life course perspective to inform high-quality programs for the ongoing care of pregnant people and their infants. Leveraging Community Input and Data on Social Determinants of Health Territories are uniquely positioned to leverage closer community ties to examine how data linkages can inform initiatives that improve experiences surrounding pregnancy and the life course after birth. As with PR, integrating the voices of pregnant people, their families, and the people providing their care into their advisory committees allows for better identification of what communities need. Active engagement ensures agencies can be efficient with their linkage efforts by tailoring their projects to high-priority maternal and infant health outcomes. Moreover, to foster community awareness about PRAMS and possible linked data sources, territories could create dashboards such as those created by Washington D.C.’s PRAMS program to provide a comprehensive and interactive view of the data. Data on social determinants of health collected through PRAMS—such as insurance coverage throughout pregnancy and postpartum as well as access to social support and a wide range of services—can also be leveraged for potential data linkage to identify inequities in health outcomes and the delivery of care. website yes

This report aims to highlight the unique vector-borne disease challenges faced by Island Areas and to dive into the key components of a mosquito control program, that are relevant to these unique jurisdictions.

Technical assistance for procuring software to support data dashboard development.

Learn more about current and upcoming public health trends through ASTHO's annual Environmental Scan.

Heart disease and stroke are the leading causes of death in Guam, Palau, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. These jurisdictions are taking innovative steps to reduce hypertension among their populations.

While COVID-19 is still present and ever-changing, public health professionals must also grapple with new challenges such as monkeypox, increasing firearm homicide, and widespread heat waves. In the wake of such emergencies, public health preparedness is more critical than ever.

ASTHO has several members from the territories and Freely Associated States—jurisdictions with unique challenges, and do not fall under the category of a state or federal district. This post is a brief look at some of the public health related legislation introduced during recent legislative sessions.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented an opportunity for an existing behavioral health resource—the Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center’s Crisis Hotline—to become a household name. During the pandemic, the hotline became a lifeline for a community in crisis greatly in need of information.

Spanish language version of "Embedded: Puerto Rico’s Public Health Emergency Preparedness Academy" blog post.

ASTHO and PIHOA Praise Approval of Medicaid Funding Fix for U.S. Territories ARLINGTON, VA—This week, Congress approved legislation to extend Medicaid funding for two years for the U.S. territories in their fiscal year 2020 appropriations bills and extenders package. Esther Muña, the chief executive officer of the Commonwealth Healthcare Corporation, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) board member, and Emi Chutaro, executive director of the Pacific Island Health Officer’s Association (PIHOA), issued the following statements applauding the bipartisan and bicameral extenders package. The legislation avoided devastating cuts to the territories’ health care services for their most vulnerable residents, scheduled to take place at the end of the year—widely called the “Medicaid Cliff.” “The U.S. territories face unique healthcare and public health challenges and the support provided through the Medicaid program allows us to care for Americans who live on these islands in their communities,” says Chutaro. “It is vital that we prioritize public health for Americans living in the U.S. territories,” says Nate Smith, secretary of health at the Arkansas Department of Health and ASTHO president. “Ensuring access to care is essential to protect and ensure health equity among and well-being within this population. As state health officials, we know that what benefits the territories will help us in our quest to bring optimal health to all.” “We are grateful for the bipartisan and bicameral legislation which provides a two-year increase in funds and federal match for the Medicaid program in the U.S. territories," says Muña. “The increased funding will allow the health care and public health systems in the U.S. territories to further improve access and quality of care to the population. This funding continues to be vital to all of the U.S. territories, and while we are grateful for this temporary fix, we must find a long-term solution to Medicaid funding to provide stability to our system of care. In the upcoming year, we look forward to working collaboratively with Congress and the Trump Administration to further bolster health care and public health systems to build healthy and resilient communities throughout the U.S. territories.” ASTHO Press Release Boilerplate PIHOA Boilerplate website yes

State and Territorial Health Leaders Convene on Capitol Hill to Advocate for Sustained Funding ARLINGTON, VA—The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) leadership and public health officials will gather in Washington, D.C. from March 10-13 for the annual Spring Leadership Forum. Attendees will gather to discuss key policy issues, attend peer learning sessions, and advocate for critical funding on Capitol Hill. Health officials are expected to highlight the value of federal funding to public health agencies as well as infrastructure needs, with the looming expiration of federal funding on March 14. Specifically, ASTHO requests Congress provide $365 million in FY25 and invest $1 billion, which equates to about $3 per person in the United States, in FY26 for vital public health infrastructure. “This week, ASTHO members are meeting with Congress to advocate for adequate resources to sustain vital, life-saving public health operations,” says Joseph Kanter, MD, MPH, ASTHO CEO. “In-person meetings allow health officials to shed light on the impact of legislation on state-level health systems. Our goal is to foster bipartisan collaboration and advocate for Americans across the country who rely on federally funded programs to stay healthy.” Additionally, senior leadership from the five U.S. territories and three freely associated states (T/FAS) will participate in an island-tailored set of meetings with Congressional and federal agency partners. On Capitol Hill, ASTHO’s T/FAS members will discuss the impact of the recently renegotiated Compacts of Free Association, as well as emphasize the importance of territorial Medicaid funding and the challenges associated with the Section 1108b cap on territorial Medicaid funding. "ASTHO’s Spring Leadership Forum is a critical opportunity for U.S. territorial and freely associated state health officials to make our voices heard in Washington, D.C. We look forward to working with members of Congress and federal agencies on emerging federal and island public health priorities," says Dr. Esther Muña, CEO of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands’ Commonwealth Healthcare Corporation, chair of the ASTHO Insular Affairs Committee, and Director on the ASTHO Board. ASTHO Press Release Boilerplate website yes

The U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands mounted a unique response to the COVID-19 pandemic as it started to sweep the globe. We discuss that approach and its successes with some of the region’s experts.

In the late fall of 2021, ASTHO leadership visited select jurisdictions in the Pacific and the Atlantic for the first time since COVID-19 curtailed travel to these regions. It was a fantastic to reconnect with our leadership and dedicated staff. Unsurprisingly, we heard about the jurisdictions’ challenges, including chronic ones related to funding and infrastructure, as well as new challenges resulting from the global pandemic.

A groundbreaking “all-of-government” approach is getting underway in the U.S. Virgin Islands to more efficiently manage and expend federal grant funding for social determinants of health and overall population health improvement. The initiative follows findings that public health agencies encounter redundant, multi-layered review and approval processes that hamper their ability to efficiently procure needed goods and services that address long standing and emerging public health needs. Moreover, such processes hinder the ability to quickly stand up critical programs and respond to public health emergencies.

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children is a targeted public health nutrition program designed to support nutrition and health behaviors that reach low-income families. The program is funded through discretionary funds to the United States Department of Agriculture and administered by each state’s health or public health department. The department then contracts with county health departments, local health centers, hospitals, federally qualified health centers, and private nonprofits to deliver community-based clinic services.