Displaying 14 results for

Though now an illegal practice, government contracts, policies, and practices have generally excluded women, and Black, Indigenous, and people of color. Still, practices and existing structures continue the inequitable distribution of all contracts. Governmental and non-governmental grants and funding should benefit the communities they serve while being proportionate to the communities' demographics. This is where inclusive contracting comes in.

When rural hospitals close, it increases the distance people must travel for essential healthcare services. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted and magnified the factors leading to rural hospital closures across the country. Many healthcare facilities suspended elective procedures to conserve critically needed personal protective equipment and reduce the risk of exposure to COVID-19 by patients and hospital staff. For many rural hospitals, however, the suspension of elective procedures with the reduced the use of non-urgent services by apprehensive patients meant a loss of revenue and the furloughed healthcare staff. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately half of all rural hospitals are experiencing negative operating margins due to reduced outpatient revenue. The rate increases in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Unfortunately, these kinds of challenges are not new to rural hospitals.

Economic security and well-being, job stability, access to safe and affordable housing, access to healthy and nutritious foods, and access to resources to manage mental and physical health—all of these things impact individual, family, and community health. The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally impacted each of these social determinants of health for many Americans. Furthermore, some communities and industries have faced harder economic impacts than others, including households with low incomes, non-white households, and households with children. Human services and public health leaders can collaborate to make sure we are rebuilding systems and programs in a way that creates healthier, more resilient families and communities.

Reprioritizing Black Maternal Health How We Can Prioritize Black Maternal Health Lawrence Young Black women face significant rates of maternal morbidity and mortality — learn how public health can better support them in this blog post. I do not have to look far to understand the urgency of the Black maternal health crisis. I have watched friends, colleagues, and loved ones from every walk of life struggle through pregnancies that should have been safe and celebrated. Some are highly educated professionals. Others are young mothers still finding their way. Many had access to quality insurance and still faced complications, long hospital stays, and minimal follow-up care. Many have shared unfortunate experiences that run the gamut from feeling unheard or perhaps unnecessarily undergoing a procedure — the care in health care was not there for them. These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a larger, structural failure that demands our attention and our action. As public health professionals, we must ask ourselves: How can we better care for and about Black mothers? And what would it look like to center them in the systems that were created to protect women in one of the most vulnerable times of their lives? Understanding the Root of the Crisis Black women in the United States are three to four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their White counterparts. In many states, including Connecticut, this difference persists even when controlling for education and income. These outcomes are not the result of individual choices or biological differences — they are the result of systems designed with historical blind spots. Education and income, often seen as protective factors, do not shield Black women from these outcomes. Research shows that pregnancy-related mortality rates are higher among Black women with a college degree than among White women with the same level of education or with less than a high school diploma. The same is true for women with respect to the risk of dying within the first year postpartum. These disparities grow with age and extend beyond mortality to include severe maternal morbidity, such as preeclampsia — a pregnancy complication related to high blood pressure — which can have lasting health impacts if untreated including death. Additionally, American Indian, Alaska Native, Black, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Asian, and Hispanic women all experience higher rates of ICU admission during delivery compared to White women. ICU admission is considered a key marker for maternal complications and system-level failure. Public Health as Partner in Progress Public health has a responsibility to do more than document issues and concerns. We must be in the business of addressing them. In Connecticut, we are working across agencies and community organizations to move from acknowledgment to action. One of the most important leaders in this work is #Day43, an initiative launched by Waterbury Bridge to Success Community Partnership. The name refers to the period between 43 days and one year postpartum, during which approximately 20% of pregnancy-related deaths occur. #Day43 exists to raise awareness of Black maternal health and transform systems to support mothers. Their work spans research, advocacy, policy, technical assistance, and storytelling grounded in lived experience. Waterbury’s maternal health data reflects this crisis. According to the #Day43 Black Maternal Health Report, 18.6% of pregnant women in Waterbury received late or no prenatal care. Those in the city face higher rates of C-sections, limited access to postpartum care, and insufficient support for mental health and breastfeeding. The community described a significant lack of maternity care resources, particularly in the North End, where many Black and Hispanic families reside. Through initiatives like this, residents are not just seen as stakeholders. They are recognized as storytellers, system builders, and agents of change. Their leadership is shaping how we define, measure, and deliver maternal care in Connecticut. This vision aligns with broader maternal health equity efforts across the state. For example, The Connecticut Health Foundation is developing a Maternal Health Equity Blueprint in partnership with community leaders, researchers, and families. Waterbury voices are essential contributors to this process. Listening as a Path of Healing The experiences of Black mothers reflect a broader truth. Too often, our systems are not built to hear them. That lack of trust is both historical and current. It shows up in rushed appointments, dismissed symptoms, and inaccessible services. Community-based providers, such as doulas and midwives of color, are critical to bridging this gap. They do more than provide care — they restore dignity. Yet these providers are often underfunded and undervalued in mainstream health care systems. Public health must champion integrating these providers into existing systems and promoting long-term sustainability. To maximize maternal health outcomes, the next phase of this work must intentionally include structured cross-sector collaboration. It must focus on building systems that educate both providers and families on urgent maternal warning signs, provide consistent discharge education, and strengthen local surveillance and outreach infrastructure. These strategies are essential, scalable, and lifesaving. We cannot improve outcomes without acknowledging the deep cultural, emotional, and psychological work required to rebuild trust. We cannot heal what we do not hear. Re-Examining the “Public” in Public Health Re-examining the public in public health means placing the needs of our most vulnerable communities at the center. It means investing in care that is integrative and supportive with community co-designed solutions. It also means wholistically addressing other intersecting systems that influence maternal outcomes. We can start by: Expanding funding for community-based perinatal health workers, including doulas and midwives. Embedding relevant metrics into maternal health program design and evaluation. Creating statewide listening sessions and family advisory councils to ensure policies reflect lived realities. Partnering across sectors to improve access to safe housing, transportation, and mental health supports for new mothers. Supporting local initiatives like #Day43 that lead from within communities and reflect community-defined solutions. Educating families on health information and individual health rights through accessible, trusted channels. To truly care for and about Black mothers, we must act beyond awareness months and social media campaigns. We must improve current processes and design opportunities that will support them and keep them alive. Public health was created to serve the public. The most powerful way to honor that mission is to focus on the public, ensuring they are a priority and not an afterthought. article yes

In February 2023, ASTHO staff traveled to Koror, Palau for a four-day health equity summit and held workshops to identify, select, and prioritize measures for Palau’s health equity work.

As in any sector, there is often talk in the public health field of “working upstream,” or addressing problems at their source. If public health is going to be a changemaker in the world, its leaders must be equal parts nimble and innovative.

While COVID-19 remains a top public health priority, the pandemic has also intensified the need for strong tobacco control policies and marketing campaigns. CDC recognizes current or former tobacco users as one of several groups at higher risk of severe illness, including hospitalization and death, after contracting COVID-19. It is distressing to see signs that our success in encouraging tobacco users to quit has been slowed over the course of the pandemic. Fortunately, amid these challenges, many tobacco control groups have stayed focused.

What We Learned at the Public Health TechXpo and Futures Forum ASTHO | Our staff's top takeaways from the TechXpo. astho, association of state and territorial health officials, public health techxpo and futures forum, public health leaders, u.s. public health system, public health policy, data sharing and modernization, population health, governmental health agencies, public health infastructure, workforce resilience, public health workforce, techxpo and futures forum, public health infrastructure, build workforce resilience, future of public health, health techxpo and futures, health leaders and experts, experts across the technology, health workforce, health outcomes, futures forum, health leaders, health departments, public health professionals, today and the future, public health services, public health techxpo Dylan Reynolds Marcus Plescia and Garfield Clunie present "The Future of Measuring Health Equity - A World of Evolving Data." Last month, ASTHO kicked off the Public Health TechXpo and Futures Forum in Chicago, an opportunity for some of the world’s top leaders in technology and to engage public health leaders on challenges and solutions for successfully modernizing the U.S. public health system. Over 600 participants were in attendance, with 200 more attending virtually from around the world. It was a packed three days. Our speakers demystified the world of public health policy, opened doors to new funding streams, and gave us a glimpse into the glittering future of data sharing and modernization. Heavy hitters from Amazon and Google weighed in as well, showing us how they’re working hand-in-hand with health agencies to change the way they approach population health and well-being. So as we look back on a busy week—and look ahead to our virtual follow-up event on June 15—here are some of the messages that stuck with us the most: "Standards are like toothbrushes. Everyone has one, and no one wants to use some else’s." The line from Gabriel Seidman, director of policy at the Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, was met with a belly laugh from a crowded room during one of the week’s most well-attended sessions, a panel conversation on the future of measuring health equity. However, Seidman’s comparison was an apt one. There is certainly much to be said for a public health data system that is engineered to meet the specific needs of its target community. However, for public health experts to do their best work, they must be able to speak a common language—at a local, state, territorial, and national level. When each level of public health is operating with different standards in place and with a different definition of success, data gets lost and people get left behind. One of the loudest calls to action from the week was for governmental health agencies to break down these data siloes and establish common standards between agencies. The "Next Pandemic" is a Priority—But It's Not the Only One There is—understandably—mounting national attention on preparing for what many public health experts believe will be the inevitable "next pandemic." The COVID-19 pandemic showed us what a lack of preparedness could mean for population health, and there is so much unknown about what the future of pandemics has in store. However, experts at the TechXpo reminded us that public health is about more than responding to a singular crisis. "I think many of the conversations we're having are so focused on COVID-like pandemics," said John Auerbach (alumni-MA) "But if we look at the things that are still killing people, for the most part it's not infectious disease." Instead, Auerbach cited challenges that have long been a part of the public health story, such as diabetes, the fentanyl overdose crisis, and climate change. Before COVID-19 entered the national spotlight, public health’s day-to-day work was largely centered on chronic disease and behavioral health. Auerbach reminded us that amid all of the unknowns of our future, there is plenty we do know—and plenty we can be doing to address it. "Modernizing data systems is more than buying a big computer." While there were many versions of this message over the course of the forum, Auerbach perhaps said it most concisely of all. In other words, it doesn’t matter if a public health agency has a chrome-plated exterior and a cloud-based data system, so long as the underlying infrastructure isn’t sustainably and thoughtfully built. Whether it’s a matter of restricted funding, antiquated processes, or siloed thinking, health agencies and their leaders must have a plan to address these challenges before assuming that “buying a big computer” will catch their data dashboards up to speed. This was one of the ironies of this future-forward event: Amid so many exciting innovations and inventions, many of the challenges boiled down to basic, equity-centered questions about the best way to get this new technology in the right people’s hands. If public health is going to take a technological leap at a national level, then it must also be able to make a leap at a community level—in communities of color, in territorial health agencies, and in our policies. Jumping lightyears ahead doesn’t count if entire populations are still being left lightyears behind. Workforce Resilience Cannot Be Taken for Granted We cannot separate the future of public health from the future of its workforce. The COVID-19 emergency response has left many public health workers feeling burned out and harboring traumatic levels of toxic stress, pushing many of them to seek out jobs outside the field. In fact, according to a recent analysis of data from the Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey, 46% of state and local public health employees left their jobs between 2017 and 2021. For public health to reach its full potential in the future, we must begin investing in that workforce today. Over the course of the week, we heard often from mental health experts and senior health officials to learn about their priorities, challenges, and paths to improve workforce well-being in their health agencies. This included the unveiling of the PH-HERO Workforce Resource Center, which arms health agencies with the resources and knowledge they need to support their workforce. Whatever the future of public health holds, it begins with a workforce who is motivated to make that future a reality. More than anything, the TechXpo was a reminder that public health’s future is as multiple as it is uncertain. We are working toward a future that is more adaptable than ever before—with thought innovators and health experts who are constantly reflecting, pivoting, and adjusting to the moment. There are so many conversations yet to be had. For those who have not done so already, we invite you to register for our fully virtual TechXpo follow-up forum on June 15, and add your voice to the growing chorus. website yes

The Key Role of Cross-Sector Partnerships in Navigating Barriers Keon Lewis Community partnerships are critical to public health's mission to promote optimal health for all — learn more. Public health departments’ mission and vision statements often share certain values and goals aimed at improving the public’s well-being. Rather than just reactively responding to immediate health threats as they come, public health departments aim to take a more proactive approach through strategies that prevent the future spread of diseases, injury, or other incidences of harm. These actions support their visions of creating communities where all residents can thrive and achieve their full health potential. Strong community partnerships are critical to public health departments’ ability to fulfill their goals. Recognizing this, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation introduced the Culture of Health Framework in 2015. As a leading national philanthropic organization focused on dismantling barriers to optimal health for all, the framework’s foundation is built upon the following action areas: Making Health a Shared Value. Creating Health. More Equitable Communities. Strengthening Integration of Health Systems and Services. Fostering Cross-Sector Collaboration. The COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath underscored the factors that created challenges to health outcomes for underserved communities; it also demonstrated the importance of sustaining strong cross-sector partnerships. Public health’s ability to align its goals with the community it serves is vital to efforts to save lives. This alignment allows public health departments to leverage the diverse resources and lived experiences that community partners bring. Recognizing the unique concomitant relationship that it has with government funding, public health departments are now going to have to pivot their strategies to achieve their missions. As public health departments experience budget and personnel cuts, its ability to promote optimal health for all and mitigate the social determinants of health is now even more reliant upon the strength of collaborative partnerships. The Public Health Paradox Public health has always been a component of our nation’s health care system, which primarily reflects specific health issues that have impacted our communities. Rather than focusing on the foundational issues that exacerbate these long-term gaps in underserved communities, government systems often allocate funding based on specific diseases or chronic health issues impacting community health. Although diseases and chronic health issues are significant public health elements that need to be addressed, there are significant nonmedical factors that play just as vital a role in influencing community health outcomes. Identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) and adopted by CDC as the social determinants of health, these variables — which include elements such as social and community construct, economic stability, and education access — have become the central driving force of public health. “The Public Health Funding Paradox,” an article from Sage Journals, offers a great perspective on how an intriguing paradox has been created due to this relationship between public health and government systems. The article underscores the complexity of governmental funding that helps to advance public health strategies while there still exist harmful policies that create barriers for certain communities. The Flint water crisis in Michigan demonstrated this paradox. Flint citizens experienced lead poisoning and death from Legionnaires’ Disease, underscoring how a community’s ability to thrive can be quickly impacted by economic difficulty and leadership decisions made by the accompanying government. The Power of Partnership Public health has long had to combat a barrage of stigmas and policy hurdles. Even at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health departments were not only in contention against the virus but also against the influence of viral misinformation that questioned their practices, strategies, and purposes. Despite these barriers, the nation witnessed the power of true cross-sector partnerships. Health care and grassroot organizations quickly found common ground to help address the needs of underserved populations. From addressing food insecurity to mental health and transportation barriers, communities successfully pivoted toward hope and found ways to save lives. Nonprofit organizations also created innovative and impactful peer-to-peer funding models that enabled them to fulfill their missions in spite of budget cuts. During this time, community health workers became a vital public health resource. As conduits between departments and local communities, community health workers became a necessary element to re-reestablishing trust in systems and care. Although the work of frontline workers and support staff served a critical role in mitigating the future spread of COVID-19, advocates and allies at the grassroots level also played an invaluable role in promoting health for all. As “The Public Health Funding Paradox” demonstrated, public health departments are only as effective as their accompanying government systems. If the leadership within these respective systems fails to align and empathize with their public health counterparts, then as a community we inevitably repeat a vicious cycle that results in poor health outcomes. Identifying Alternative Routes Cross-sector partnerships serve a vital role in enabling public health systems to better serve their communities. Budget cuts and stricter policies have created barriers for local and statewide agencies, academic institutions, and nonprofit organizations. The ability to develop essential personnel, continue pertinent research, and utilize mitigating practices have been inhibited by these barriers. It has become increasingly evident that, rather than focusing on reactive strategies, public health must go upstream and address the social needs of our communities. With cuts to funding, public health systems have to do more with less, making it more difficult to address diseases and chronic health problems. Working upstream to address root causes of health outcomes is one way to better leverage thinner resources. As our public health systems continue to work diligently to monitor, support, and mitigate community health barriers, there is still more research needed to explore the most effective cross-sector partnership frameworks. Public health’s efforts must remain intentional in developing comprehensive health advisory coalitions, leadership development cohorts, civic and community engagement projects, and paradigm shifts in academic curricula. The leaders and changemakers of tomorrow require growth in their competencies today. Cross-sector partnerships must continue to build their foundations upon systems of trust and transparency. Public and private health systems, the social sector, and other community stakeholders can partner to improve the population’s overall well-being while simultaneously achieving a mutually beneficial “social return on investment.” Public health’s ability to align with the achievement of optimal health for all requires more than just serving on the front line when a crisis occurs — it is critical that these departments must continuing enhancing their collaborative partnerships and community engagement. article yes

With the COVID-19 pandemic in full force, health agencies are ensuring that their focus does not drift from the fight to end the HIV epidemic. Resiliency is key to continue to make progress in this decades-long fight.

Hispanic Heritage Month takes place annually from September 15-October 15 to celebrate the history, culture, achievements, and influence of the Hispanic and Latinx community in the U.S. In recognition of this month, ASTHO interviewed one of our newest members, José Romero, MD, Secretary of Health at the Arkansas Department of Health. In this blog post, he speaks with us about how his experiences as a Hispanic working in healthcare have impacted him and his leadership style.

A discussion with Meredith Allen, ASTHO’s Vice President for Health Security, about how the first shipments of the COVID-19 vaccinations have been a major turning point for the pandemic and a milestone moment for U.S. public health history.

Community engagement is essential in the fight to end the HIV epidemic. By prioritizing a health equity lens, those battling HIV can be better heard and involved in improving their health.

This week has been both exhilarating and poignant. Almost surreal. We started the week by pausing to celebrate and reflect on the life and legacy of one of America’s greatest sons, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. On Tuesday, ASTHO participated in the National Day of Healing, which provided opportunities for our staff to engage in conversations with one another, seeing one another’s humanity, as well for individual mediation, reflection and learning. On Wednesday, we were honored to witness the inauguration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris—the first woman, first Black and first Asian American person to serve in this role. This week also marked one year since we learned of the first known case of COVID-19. Despite these challenges, I am more optimistic now than ever that our collective impact and commonsense recovery response will help guide our successful return to safety and normalcy.