Displaying 6 results for

In-depth analysis on state health policy surrounding the public health workforce. This is part of ASTHO's annual legislative prospectus series.

This brief examines the ways states can support certification for community health workers.

This brief discusses what peer support is, how it is financed, and how incorporating peer support services into federally qualified health centers can be an especially successful strategy for delivering care to safety-net populations.

States Stay Prepared by Supporting the Public Health Workforce Margaret Nilz, Christina Severin Learn how states use policy to support emergency preparedness and bolster the public health workforce. Public health — particularly public health preparedness — continues to experience workforce shortages, driven by longstanding systemic challenges such as chronic underfunding, high turnover, limited recruitment, and an aging workforce. While some jurisdictions report increased capacity to hire and train public health staff in recent years, they often rely on short-term or temporary funding streams, which limit long-term sustainability. State, local, tribal, and territorial health agencies have varying capacities to respond to public health emergencies, particularly in rural and underserved communities. Because a limited workforce can inhibit emergency preparedness efforts, jurisdictions recognize the importance of cultivating a resilient public health preparedness workforce to respond to future emergencies. In recent years, jurisdictions have pursued several policy interventions to bolster the public health preparedness workforce such as legislation supporting front-line clinical staff and first responders, and rulemaking and other executive powers to provide structural and financial support to critical personnel. Legislative Efforts Legislative efforts to increase benefits and support for health care and public health workers can help address the root causes of workforce challenges and lay the groundwork for sustainable, long-term investment in public health preparedness. Laws that establish standards and expectations for the preparedness workforce, including expansions of benefits or additional training, support workforce growth and retention. Since 2024, several jurisdictions expanded mental health benefits and related support for first responders and other preparedness personnel. Both Alaska (SB 103) and California (AB 2859) enacted legislation that allows peer support programs for emergency service personnel. In Alaska, the bill creates programs for entities such as law enforcement agencies, firefighters, and emergency dispatchers, while California’s bill creates programs to serve a variety of health care providers involved in emergency medical care, including physicians, nurses, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Utah enacted HB 378, which requires the Department of Public Safety to annually distribute information about its critical incident stress management program to first responder agencies. The bill also requires first responder agencies to annually notify employees about the availability of mental health resources, including periodic screenings for employees and continued support for retired or separated first responders and their spouses. On a broader scale, Hawaii SB 3279 recently established a well-being project tasked with mental health trainings and support for several community organizations, including first responders, hospitals, and medical staff. In Washington, HB 2311 directs the state’s Criminal Justice Training Commission to develop resources for first responder wellness, including a peer support network for active and retired first responders and their families. States have also enacted legislation expanding traditional employment-related benefits, including Colorado (HB 24-1219), which expanded certain health benefits for firefighters to include part-time and volunteer firefighters, and Idaho HB 55, which allows retired public employees to volunteer with public employers without it being considered reemployment. In addition, Georgia HB 451 requires state and local entities to provide disability benefits for first responders who experience occupational or volunteer-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Finally, several jurisdictions enacted legislation to support education and training for their public health and health care workforce. For example, Kentucky HB 484 established an emergency medical service education grant program that provides tuition support for students pursuing paramedic certification, wage reimbursement to ambulance providers whose employees pursue certification, and funding for institutions planning to offer EMT, advanced EMT, and paramedic programs. Oklahoma HB 1696 expands eligibility for the Oklahoma Medical Loan Repayment program to include certified nurse practitioners. Two new laws in Puerto Rico require police officers with the Puerto Rico Police Bureau to be certified in first aid or immediate rescue (PC 0859) and adds seminars on sign language, suicide prevention, and conflict mediation to the Bureau’s continuing education training (PC 0543). Other Policy Levers: Beyond the Legislature Jurisdictions can also use non-legislative policy tools to enhance workforce capacity in public health preparedness. This includes rulemaking, where executive agencies use existing legal authority to adopt or amend regulations. Regulations have the force of law and can help support the public health workforce by establishing licensure standards, training requirements, and operational protocols. Wisconsin, following the enactment of AB 576 in 2024, is developing rules to establish a program for peer support and critical stress management teams in the state. And Utah recently adopted rules for its first responder mental health services grant, which helps these professionals pursue a degree or certification as a mental health provider. Government agencies can also leverage grants and contracts to fund and otherwise direct workforce development initiatives, support training programs, and expand capacity in targeted areas. Jurisdictions can strategically direct funds to address skill gaps and assist local, state, tribal, and territorial agencies build a more resilient workforce. One example of this is in Michigan, where in 2024 the state health agency issued a request for grant proposals to award up to $9 million in EMS workforce grants, building on similar awards to address EMS shortages in 2023. Executive orders are another policy option for jurisdictions to consider as they explore different pathways to workforce sustainability. Executive orders are issued by a jurisdiction’s chief executive (often the governor) and direct certain policy actions or activities. Generally, the power to issue an executive order comes from existing law or a jurisdiction’s constitution and, in most cases, does not require legislative approval or review. Several states have leveraged executive orders to advance the public health workforce and support preparedness activities more specifically. For example, Vermont and New Jersey have recently used executive orders to create or extend advisory councils on issues pertinent to public health preparedness. In 2024, Virginia’s governor issued an executive order formalizing the Office of First Responder Wellness, which provides training, counseling, and other resources to first responders in Virginia. In 2023, the governor of Maryland issued an executive order establishing a State of Preparedness directive if there is a risk of public emergency, and the actions state agencies must undertake to promote improved coordination and hazard planning. Key Takeaways Addressing public health emergency preparedness workforce challenges demands strategic, long-term policy solutions, but several implementation options are available. Health agencies can pursue a variety of policy interventions to support and prepare their public health workforce for future emergencies. ASTHO will continue to monitor this important issue and provide updates as appropriate. article yes

Leading from the Inside: Advancing DEI at the State Level astho, association of state and territorial health officials, workplace cultures, financial performance, creates a positive, diversity equity and inclusion dei, united states, work life balance, hiring process, human resources, organizational culture, top talent, team members, employee engagement, recruiting process, long term, public health worker, socioeconomic status, races ethnicities, retain employees, company s culture, diversity equity inclusion, public service, recruitment retention development, public health workforce, work culture, organizational values, diversity matters James Bell III Three steps on how to implement DEI strategies at the organizational level. Campaigns for racial justice have grown throughout our country, and parallel conversations focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have increased, especially in public service. We experience this effect through the lens of facilitating more equitable and responsive service delivery. Our programming, policies, and data must be culturally informed and relevant. But DEI must also be valued internally in how we contribute to employee recruitment, retention, and development. Today’s workplace is complex, and DEI is vital for improving outcomes for all the populations we serve. Most modern organizations have come to terms with the critical need for DEI initiatives. The evidence highlighting how these efforts can improve an organization’s productivity, creativity, retention, and financial success has been clear for some time. But, honestly, is that enough? And why haven’t we made the earth-shattering changes we all know are possible? Perhaps it could be traced back to the changes we hope to seek being assigned outside of our organization when it should be us who are leading and implementing change. Breaking down siloes for diversity requires new ways of working with fewer barriers among and across teams and their unique people. To remove these perceived barriers, I propose that a few key steps must take place. 1. Put the people first. I have been in too many meetings where employees are considered “resources” or “FTEs,” and it’s so unfortunate. As advantageous as it may be for some, the lure of DEI as a return on investment cannot be the sole purpose for pursuing such initiatives. We lose the essence of humanity and unique individuality that makes diversity so special when we limit people to a box on an organizational chart. If governments want to attract and retain the best possible talent, the actual business case to make is talent itself. Building a diverse and inclusive culture cannot only be a human resources function or a top-down effort. All people across departments should see themselves reflected in this work and be able to identify a path to make it their own. As leaders, we should work relentlessly toward understanding the needs of others while building a safe environment for the type of collaboration needed to solve complex problems better. This means constantly learning and embracing new concepts, ideas, and ways of doing things. Each of us has the power to create a more substantial, fairer workplace where everyone can contribute their strengths, talents, and ideas while being treated with dignity and respect. 2. Back your program with a budget. Organizations have shouted their pledges and promises to foster more diverse, equitable, and inclusive environments from any rooftop they could find for at least three years. Although determining which groups are walking the walk is challenging, a strong indication of one’s commitment is to look at budget line items. A lack of or limited budget is an immediate red flag that conveys that DEI is not a priority. Just like anything else, if something is important to you, you will spend the money required to implement it properly. One of the best ways to demonstrate your commitment to DEI is through sustainable, tangible financial investment. This allows our DEI initiatives to be continuous and to evolve over time based on the immediate need. We are not in a position to check the box or allow one implicit bias course to cover all the broad gaps we are experiencing. There is also the benefit of a broad supply of qualified DEI practitioners and consultants who are experienced in guiding organizations through complex DEI issues. Should we continue to face complicated and longstanding DEI issues, it isn’t up to our staff to try to resolve them. We must assign monthly, quarterly, or annual monies to address these problems. 3. Hold yourself and your organization accountable. Regardless of agency or size, DEI efforts within organizations often lack strategic follow-through and accountability. These endeavors are often reactive, episodic, or only prioritized after a public relations crisis. We can’t only respond when we are required to respond. The communities we serve—and our employees—expect that we will carry out our responsibilities and fulfill our promises. We have not consistently been diligent in creating mechanisms for feedback, and if we have, we fail to implement them. To truly embed DEI into our culture, we need meaningful metrics and the willingness and courage to use the data to hold ourselves accountable. How will we ever know if we are going in the right direction or making desired changes if we never discuss the data? And that isn’t to say results must be perfect because we know changes take time. But it communicates clear goals and allows for solid focus and discussion for alignment. This disclosure is necessary to drive change and inspire others by demonstrating that progress is possible. The future of state government must fully embrace diversity, equity, and inclusion both as an aspiration and as a responsibility. We must create a sense of belonging and environment for organizational justice, even if this means resisting the status quo that we have nurtured and become far too comfortable letting stand. We should be celebrating rather than marginalizing employees because of their individuality. We should be challenging business practices that undermine our organizational values and fail to treat employees equitably. Author card spacing 1 Related Content-Blog - DELPH Magazine 2 website yes

Members of the Making Dialysis Safer for Patients Coalition discuss the role of public health in dialysis safety and the impact the coalition has had on their work.