Displaying 1-20 of 51 results for

Centralizing Administrative Functions, with Lessons Learned from Guam Megan Drake-Pereyra Centralizing administrative functions, such as procurement or grants management, is a strategy many organizations utilize. Having administrative functions concentrated with a specific team rather than dispersed or managed within separate teams can work well. There is potential for standardized processes and procedures, increased efficiency and quality, more control and accountability, and consistent data collection and monitoring. This brief details how health departments can utilize existing, evidence-based frameworks to centralize administrative functions and build off lessons learned from others, such as the Guam Department of Public Health and Social Services (Guam DPHSS). Getting Started Considerations When transitioning from a decentralized structure to a centralized structure, it is important to clearly outline the what, why, how, and benefits. Consider the following components to kickstart success: Leadership vision: Start with the leader’s visionary perspective. When the leader allocates sufficient time and consistently reinforces the vision, it allows for the necessary decisions, trust, and support to be established during the transition. Data-driven design: Use data and existing information, such as current standard operating procedures or process diagrams, to understand the decentralized process differences/similarities, and guide effective centralized processes and procedures. Role clarity: Clearly outline and define the new centralized infrastructure, purpose, roles, responsibilities, expectations, and procedures. This helps everyone understand and follow the new processes more consistently, with better results. Performance measures: Establish and use performance measures from the outset (e.g., team knowledge, skills, competency, process time and quality, outcomes, impact, etc.), for insight into the value, or return on investment, of the centralized model. This will help indicate the quantity, quality, and impact of programs/processes. Documentation: Capture and share decisions, vision, goals, structure, standard operating procedures, and relevant details in writing for new team members and users of the centralized functions. Communication: Transparently share plans, timelines, and additional knowledge to maximize utilization and value. Additionally, anticipate and proactively address resistance to change to help everyone embrace and adhere to the new, centralized approach. The Plan-Do-Study-Act Method Change management, quality planning, and process improvement models can also support organizational and process change. For example, the quality improvement methodology, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA), offers an effective framework for centralizing administrative functions and complements many of the aforementioned considerations: Step one, plan, relies on leaders to decide the vision, scope, structure, roles/responsibilities, goals, and purpose of the centralized team. Here leaders establish and reinforce the leadership vision, using existing data to guide the design of the new centralized team. Step two, do, is dedicated to onboarding centralized team members, defining their work processes and procedures, and ensuring effective communication with all stakeholders. This requires thorough documentation and strong communications plans. Step three, study—an often overlooked but crucial building step—is for testing the processes, procedures, roles, and responsibilities, to confirm and build confidence that this centralized structure will yield the desired results. Performance measures provide clarity into what is working well and what is not. Step four, act, is for launching and rolling out the structure, ongoing monitoring of performance, and continuing to educate and coach for successful, sustainable improvements. Lessons Learned from Guam Guam DPHSS, a joint health and social services agency, is working to centralize its administrative functions to reduce inefficiencies and redundancies as well as improve quality and consistency. This has been a big change for Guam DPHSS, but leadership vision, documentation, role clarity, and communication have proven to be key throughout the process. In 2021, Guam DPHSS established a centralized Office of Grants Management (OGM). In its early stages, programmatic teams saw OGM as a regulatory body that would audit and direct their work, while OGM’s true objective was to provide support and ease administrative burden, allowing program staff to focus on accomplishing their goals and deliverables. By clarifying and documenting the vision, roles, and responsibilities as well as focusing on communication, the OGM built trust, addressed specific concerns, and established a shared vision of their role as supportive and helpful. In 2023, Guam DPHSS began the process of establishing a centralized Procurement Management Office (PMO). While Guam DPHSS reorganized and co-located staff into the new, centralized PMO, Guam was undergoing a governmentwide business process improvement (BPI) project focused on procurement—presenting an opportunity for Guam DPHSS to involve new PMO staff and other key DPHSS team members in improving its functions and centralizing the procurement process. Through the BPI project, which utilized PDSA, DPHSS clarified roles and responsibilities, defined work processes and procedures, and developed training and communications plans that supported process improvement and centralization of procurement functions. Guam DPHSS has learned many lessons throughout their journey to create a centralized OGM and PMO, including that change of this magnitude is hard—more specifically, balancing change management while ensuring maintenance of key operations. Ultimately, they found that the aforementioned considerations and methods for getting started were critical in supporting the change to centralized administrative functions. Establishing the Ideal Structure for Administrative Functions Determining if and how centralized administrative functions will work for an organization is multifaceted. An organization’s culture, size, infrastructure (including technology and systems), and workforce and skills all play crucial roles in shaping the ideal structure. The methods and considerations noted previously can help health departments determine and support the best path forward for each unique organization. ASTHO has several additional resources and tools that can support administrative change and improvement. Visit the ASTHO STAR Center to learn more. website yes

Ripple Effect: What USPSTF Recommendations Mean for State and Territorial Health Law What USPSTF Recommendations Mean for State and Territorial Health Law Andy Baker-White This Health Policy Update highlights how U.S. states and territories are using policy to codify important public health recommendations. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a volunteer panel of national experts that issues evidence-based letter-grade recommendations on clinical preventive services. Under the Affordable Care Act, services with an A or B grade must be covered by most private health insurance plans without cost-sharing, with similar requirements for Medicaid enrollees and Medicare beneficiaries. An estimate by the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that in 2020, these services reached approximately 264 million Americans. States and territories implement these recommendations through statutes and rules. ASTHO identified over 200 state and territorial laws referencing the USPSTF, including in insurance statutes, Medicaid rules, disease-specific laws, and state employee health plan requirements. Over the past year, the stability of USPSTF recommendations has come into question. The U.S. Supreme Court's June 2025 ruling in Kennedy v. Braidwood confirmed the HHS Secretary’s authority to block USPSTF recommendations and remove task force members. News reports in July 2025 indicated that HHS Secretary Kennedy intended to remove all USPSTF members, and in May 2026 fired the chair and vice-chair of the task force. Questions are being raised about whether USPSTF recommendations will be rescinded or downgraded and, if so, what the impact would be on states and territories. In addition, if the USPSTF fails to convene in the future, it cannot review newer data on preventive services, meaning existing recommendations could become outdated and USPSTF can’t make recommendations for new services. To meet these challenges, states and territories are taking steps to ensure the continued scientific basis for preventive health services within their own law. Dynamic References to USPSTF Recommendations States and territories often use dynamic references to USPSTF recommendations in regulating health plan coverage of preventive services. This allows the jurisdiction to automatically require coverage for the most current USPSTF recommendations. Laws in West Virginia (state employee health plans), Oregon (regulated health plans), Hawaii (health director standing orders), and Alaska (adult Medicaid enrollees) use this approach. While dynamic references allow jurisdictions to stay up to date with the recommendations, if the task force withdraws any guidance, then those preventive services would no longer require no-cost coverage without additional action from those jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions address this by specifying that certain USPSTF guidance changes will not apply. For example, Guam’s law requires continued no-cost coverage for colorectal cancer screenings and authorizes the health director to adjust diabetes screening recommendations if USPSTF recommendations cease. Illinois specifies that the 2009 USPSTF recommendations for breast cancer screening and mammography are not to be considered current because national medical bodies created differing recommendations for screening. Another way jurisdictions avoid the unpredictability of using dynamic references is locking in the date of the USPSTF recommendations that are used for coverage requirements. For example, Massachusetts requires its state employee health plan to cover USPSTF A and B recommendations that were in effect by July 1, 2023. Using a version of USPSTF recommendations from a specific date maintains a base level of coverage regardless of future changes, though adopting new recommendations or removing outdated recommendations would require separate action. During this year’s legislative sessions, several states enacted or proposed legislation to remove dynamic USPSTF references. For example, Maryland passed legislation (HB 637 and SB 385) to lock in the USPSTF A and B recommendations that were in effect on December 31, 2024. Washington enacted HB 2242 requiring coverage of USPSTF A and B recommendations in effect on June 30, 2025, as well as recommendations adopted by the state insurance commissioner. A bill passed in Delaware, HB 338, would require the use of the USPSTF recommendations from January 1, 2025. Overall, however, neither dynamic nor fixed references to USPSTF recommendations address how jurisdictions can keep up with new scientific data and advances in preventive services in the absence of ongoing USPSTF review and recommendations. To fill this need, some states have enacted legislation that creates processes for reviewing data and establishing recommendations. For example, the new Maryland law mentioned above also authorizes the state’s health secretary to adopt preventive service recommendations that have not been recommended by or that differ from USPSTF. The new process requires notice and a 30-day comment period, an analysis by the Maryland Health Care Commission, and citations to the authoritative medical body upon which the recommendation is based. Disease-Specific Statutes: USPSTF Grades as Care Standards and Thresholds Many states also use USPSTF grades as thresholds for specific preventive services, establishing the standard of care, or issuing standing orders. For example, Arkansas law defines "follow-up colonoscopy" by reference to a colorectal screening assigned an A or B grade by the USPSTF, while Nevada’s law directs primary care providers to use criteria set out in USPSTF recommendations to screen adult women for BRCA mutations. In Hawaii, the state health director is authorized to issue public health standing orders for current USPSTF A and B recommended services, and in Idaho the law uses USPSTF guidance for applying ocular antibiotic prophylaxis to newborns as the standard for medical practice in the state. Some states are considering legislation to distance preventive service coverage requirements from USPSTF recommendations. For example, while New Jersey's current law requires no-cost coverage for colorectal cancer screenings in accordance with the method and frequency recommended by the USPSTF, introduced legislation (A4916 and S4254) would remove the reference to USPSTF recommendations and instead authorize one screening per year for persons aged 33 or older. More broadly, Hawaii considered legislation (HB 1898 and SB 3133) that would have authorized the state’s health department to “make recommendations relating to clinical preventive service recommendations of the [USPSTF] Force that have been assigned a grade of A or B as of July 1, 2025” and require no-cost coverage for the department’s recommendations. However, this legislation did not pass. State Employee Benefit Plans USPSTF recommendations may also be used to establish preventive health services covered by state employee health plans. A West Virginia statute requires the state’s employee health plans to cover mammograms consistent with "current guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force," while the health plan document further states that preventive services are "subject to change as USPSTF…recommendations are updated.” In Ohio, a regulation requires state employee health benefits include all USPSTF-recommended tobacco cessation services and authorizes the state health director to update covered services if USPSTF guidance changes. Missouri law requires full coverage of USPSTF graded A and B recommended prescription and prescribed over-the-counter drugs for state plan members. The Path Forward USPSTF recommendations have helped millions of Americans receive critical health services at no cost, and states and territories have built practices, programs, and standards on that foundation. From adopting fixed-date references to establishing state-level recommendation authority to creating new state review bodies, legislative activity this year reflects a broad effort to address ripple effects from potential future changes to or lack of USPSTF guidance. Health officials may be asked to assess their jurisdiction’s laws and their use of USPSTF recommendations, and coordinate with insurance commissioners, Medicaid directors, and employee benefits administrators to confirm consistent agency interpretation and identify where action is needed. ASTHO will continue to monitor these policies as they develop. article yes

Strengthening Public Health Workforce Capacity in Island Jurisdictions Strengthening Public Health Workforce Capacity in Island Jurisdictions A.C. Rothenbuecher, Allison Budzinski, Marta McMillion, Melissa Sever Guam and CNMI leveraged support from ASTHO to improve their public health workforce planning — learn more in this blog post. Strategic workforce planning helps public health agencies stay prepared, attract and retain the right talent, and build flexible systems that can handle change. When done well, it leads to better services, stronger performance, and a healthier work environment. It also saves money by reducing turnover and helps agencies respond to health emergencies or challenges as they arise. A Learning Collaborative Approach For U.S territories and freely associated states, where geography, connectivity, and resources pose unique challenges, strategic planning is especially important. With support from the Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG), the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) and the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) launched a nine-month Island-Centric Workforce Planning Learning Collaborative to offer support as island health departments strengthen their workforce planning efforts. This pilot included workforce teams from Guam’s Department of Public Health and Social Services and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island’s (CNMI) Commonwealth Healthcare Corporation, Division of Public Health Services. The learning collaborative gave participating island health departments a chance to build on their strengths while getting tailored support for workforce planning. Through expert guidance, peer sharing, and coaching — both online and in person — participants worked through each step of ASTHO’s Workforce Planning Guide and explored essential workforce components aligned with PHAB’s Standards and Measures for Accreditation. The collaborative took a “start with what you have” approach, building on previous workforce planning efforts, existing data, and plans in both Guam and CNMI while leveraging resources from several national partners in the process. From Resources to Results: Putting Workforce Tools to Work Before the learning collaborative began, ASTHO, PHAB, and the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) teamed up to streamline and align their workforce planning resources. Early coordination ensured the tools complemented each other and avoided duplication. The ASTHO Workforce Planning Guide served as the foundation, while PHAB’s Workforce Plan Template gave health departments a clear structure to build upon. UNMC’s Public Health Workforce Planning: A Practical Guide and workforce data from the de Beaumont Foundation’s Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) helped ground planning efforts with practical guidance for facilitators and up-to-date data reflecting current needs and priorities. Callout 1 - Blog - Strengthening Public Health Workforce Capacity in Island Jurisdictions Collaboration Across Islands: Sharing Challenges and Solutions Over the course of the learning collaborative, Guam and CNMI’s public health teams built strong relationships by sharing challenges, exchanging ideas, and celebrating progress. Common issues like limited workforce capacity helped them relate to one another, while differences in structure and resources sparked creative solutions. The peer relationships and connections that were built and strengthened during the collaborative continue. On-Site Support ASTHO visited both jurisdictions to meet with leaders, review progress, and plan next steps — reinforcing the value of ongoing partnerships in workforce development. During the visits, participants revisited the Workforce Planning Cycle, layered in the latest PH WINS data, refined draft plan sections, clarified alignment with PHAB workforce standards, and considered the sustainability of their work beyond the collaborative. The hands-on sessions blended facilitation, coaching, and dedicated writing time, allowing participants to make measurable progress on their plans. What Guam and CNMI Achieved Through the learning collaborative, Guam and CNMI made meaningful progress in their strategic workforce planning efforts. Some near-term successes include: Active Workforce Committees: Both jurisdictions formed or maintained dedicated teams to lead workforce planning efforts. Steps Toward Accreditation: Each agency advanced efforts towards PHAB recognition related to a core domain, “Maintain a Competent Public Health Workforce.” Smart Use of Data: Each agency used human resource, workforce, and PH WINS data to guide decisions and improve planning. Stronger Capacity: Teams gained valuable skills and knowledge to support long-term workforce efforts. Customized Action Plans: Each agency created tailored plans aligned with their unique goals and needs. While Guam and CNMI achieved many similar milestones, each jurisdiction brought its own strengths and strategies to the table. Their different approaches offer valuable lessons for tailoring workforce planning and technical assistance to local needs. Guam emphasized structural development and broad departmental engagement, while CNMI leaned into data-driven decision-making and sustained leadership support. Callout 2 - Blog - Strengthening Public Health Workforce Capacity in Island Jurisdictions What Other Jurisdictions Can Learn The Island-Centric Workforce Learning Collaborative offers practical lessons for other jurisdictions focusing on workforce planning: Start with leadership support and clear roles across teams. Utilize and adapt existing tools and frameworks, like the PHAB Workforce Planning Template, the ASTHO Workforce Planning Guide, and UNMC’s Public Health Workforce Planning: A Practical Guide to jumpstart planning. Request tailored coaching and technical assistance through national organizations such as ASTHO and PHAB. Leverage workforce data, such as PH WINS, to inform decisions and progress. Collaborate across partners to benefit from diverse expertise. Celebrate your wins to build momentum and morale. What’s Next for Workforce Development in CNMI and Guam The success of the Island-Centric Workforce Learning Collaborative highlights what’s possible when public health agencies are supported with the right tools, partnerships, and local context. Guam and CNMI’s progress show that even in resource-limited settings, meaningful change is achievable. Special Thanks - Blog - Strengthening Public Health Workforce Capacity in Island Jurisdictions OE22-2203 PHIG article yes

Learn how territorial and freely associated state health agencies can support community health workers and their vital work in this brief.

Collecting and sharing data are crucially important to improving health equity, because those datasets inform effective policymaking. Despite having some of the most challenging population health outcomes, the U.S. island areas are often absent within federal public health datasets.Federal, island, and nonprofit partners should prioritize efforts to increase their inclusion.

Learn how increasing the use of indirect cost rates in the territories and freely associated states can help improve public health financing in these jurisdictions.

This report aims to highlight the unique vector-borne disease challenges faced by Island Areas and to dive into the key components of a mosquito control program, that are relevant to these unique jurisdictions.

This toolkit is designed to support public health leaders in leveraging the policy development process to achieve health equity in their jurisdiction.

Education materials developed for partners to educate patients of priority population. The materials covered information on the definition of hypertension, what are the current guidelines, and listed facts specific to Guam's population.

A program guide with information on available programs and a health planner for patients to track goals, progress, doctor's appointments, and next steps.

Heart disease and stroke are the leading causes of death in Guam, Palau, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. These jurisdictions are taking innovative steps to reduce hypertension among their populations.

Get insights into Guam’s public health landscape, including health priorities, infrastructure, and ASTHO’s efforts to strengthen health systems.

Guam, Palau, and CNMI PHIG teams leverage diverse expertise to advance data modernization assessment, planning, and implementation strategies.

Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention in the Pacific Territories heart disease, stroke prevention, american heart month, cardiovascular health, chronic disease, pacific territories, environmental infrastructure, disease epidemic, tobacco use, mental health, united states, physical activity, health problems, leading cause of death, health conditions, american heart, cardiovascular disease, chest pain, type of heart disease, coronary heart disease, heart health, flow to the heart, risk of heart disease, heart disease and stroke, prevent heart disease, astho, association of state and territorial health officials Marcus Plescia Heart disease and stroke prevention in the pacific territories. Each February, American Heart Month raises awareness for heart disease and cardiovascular health—a matter that warrants attention year-round. In ASTHO’s 2023 Environmental Scan, territorial health officials highlighted chronic disease prevention and treatment as top current public health program and service priorities, emphasizing heart disease and stroke as key focus areas. As such, I want to highlight heart disease as a public health issue in the U.S. territories, which have played an important role in ASTHO’s chronic disease prevention efforts. Several years ago, ASTHO CEO Mike Fraser pointed out Mark Durand’s work in the Pacific territories. Durand developed a list of prioritized chronic disease-related health policies and a matrix to map progress across six jurisdictions. This ultimately provided the basis for ASTHO’s Essential Policies for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control—which served as a foundation for ASTHO’s Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention (HDSP) Learning Collaborative—and led to the launch of ASTHO’s technical packages in all program areas. Heart Disease and Stroke Prevalence in the Pacific In the United States, heart disease is the first leading cause of death and stroke is the fifth. Disparities exist across several demographic lines, including race, ethnicity, and nationality. U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPIs) adults have the second-highest death rate from cardiovascular disease in the country. Additionally, in all USAPIs involved in ASTHO’s HDSP Learning Collaborative—Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), Guam, and Republic of Palau—heart disease and stroke are in the top three leading causes of death, with cases soaring in recent years. The U.S. territories are home to small and diverse populations with rich history, cultural practices, and languages. Unfortunately, the long-lasting impacts of colonialism have weakened the social, cultural, and environmental infrastructure that has historically protected the health of USAPIs communities. In recent decades, health threats have shifted from infectious diseases to preventable chronic diseases; the Pacific Island Health Officers Association even declared a Regional State of Emergency in 2010 because of their non-communicable disease epidemic. Since this declaration, there has been increased interest in and efforts toward policy and health system interventions in USAPIs, which ASTHO has been proud to support through our learning collaborative. Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Learning Collaborative: Key Accomplishments Since 2013, ASTHO has partnered with CDC to develop and sustain the HDSP Learning Collaborative, focused on improving rates of hypertension. In all, 36 participating states, territories, and freely associated states have implemented innovative strategies through systems, policy, and quality improvement processes. Historically, this learning collaborative—open to both states and islands—has focused on the design and implementation of hypertension control programs. In USAPIs, program efforts evolved to address and improve cardiovascular health more broadly. Although USAPIs workplans differ from each other, they all have advanced health equity by understanding community needs and adapting to health system capacity. Table-CMO Heart Disease Stroke Prevention in the Pacific Tools for Change/Spotlight-CMO Heart Disease Stroke Prevention in the Pacific website yes

This brief highlights four top takeaways from the experience of six public health agencies working to establish and strengthen their own performance management systems.

Strengthening Leadership, Risk Communications, and Preparedness in the Islands Strengthening Public Health Preparedness in the Islands Sidnie Christian, Alyssa Boyea Key strategies in on leadership, risk communications, and preparedness, can help island jurisdictions prepare for and respond to emerging public health threats. ASTHO convened a two-day, in-person workshop in Honolulu from June 25 – 26, bringing together public health preparedness staff from American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Hawaiʻi, the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and Palau, as well as federal partners from CDC, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. The workshop focused on leadership and workforce development, risk communications, administrative preparedness, and more to support island areas as they prepare for and respond to natural disasters and other emerging public health threats, of which emerged key learnings that can benefit all island jurisdictions. Leadership and Workforce Development Leading through change requires transparency, trust, and collaboration. Planned change involves assessing readiness for change, identifying resources needed, securing buy-in, and determining a path forward. However, sometimes change can leave little to no time for preparation. Island jurisdictions have encountered challenges in the face of change, with many workshop participants sharing firsthand challenges around retaining institutional knowledge, infrastructure, and receiving assistance from the mainland United States in a timely fashion. As such, change readiness, succession planning, and effective change management practices are of utmost importance in the islands. Key recommendations and takeaways include: Utilizing a reputable framework, such as Kotter 8-Step Change Model, is pivotal for improving change readiness and change management. Change management frameworks and methods can assist with different types of change including structural change, strategic operational change, people-centric change, etc. Trust is hard to build, but easy to lose. Participants spoke about characteristics of high trust relationships including open communication, consistency, good judgement or expertise, and cultural sensitivity, while low trust relationships characteristics include lack of communication, inconsistency, and lack of teamwork. Succession planning is important to ensure institutional knowledge and capabilities remain in the wake of staff turnover or retirement. Identifying the necessary expertise, skills, and capabilities for each role is vital in the case of unplanned changes in staffing. Promising practices include annual review of critical positions, conducting talent calibration sessions, defining action plans, and obtaining buy-in from leadership and relevant partners. Risk Communications The island jurisdictions face emergencies that require creative response efforts. Both Hawaiʻi and RMI demonstrated innovative approaches in risk communications during COVID-19, finding success in forming critical partnerships, utilizing trusted voices within the community, and bridging communication gaps: Hawaiʻi utilized social media to showcase individuals such as doctors, pastors, social media influencers, and even local sports teams getting vaccinated, and utilized trusted voices to deliver messages. Additionally, they translated their materials into three languages (Marshallese, Samoan, and Hawaiʻian), modeling that no one gets forgotten, the true meaning of “ohana.” RMI created a working group with a mix of partners that curated press releases, educational materials, and sitreps, and served as a liaison between RMI Ministry of Health and Human Services and the community. It also partnered with several media outlets (e.g., radio stations, local papers, and other private sectors) and utilized mass text messaging to spread information quickly. The latter proved to resonate with most island jurisdictions who struggle with staying connected to hard-to-reach populations, namely those in more rural and disconnected communities. RMI was able to connect with these populations through WhatsApp to keep them updated throughout the COVID-19 response. Administrative Preparedness Improving administrative preparedness plans and processes ensure timely and efficient access to needed resources for a public health response. Most workshop participants are currently in the process of updating existing administrative preparedness plans, while some are working with other departments to create and implement new plans. Attendees discussed key partnerships for collaboration including other departments, Medical Reserve Corps, and other volunteer organizations. One common key challenge that emerged was around staffing (e.g., finding qualified people to fill vacancies, hiring process issues, making sure positions are competitive, etc.). To address this issue, island jurisdictions can work closely with other departments or jurisdictional agencies to streamline current processes, establish memorandums of understanding with different partners/facilities to assist with emergency procurement, and ensuring staffing vacancies are competitive and match public health classifications. Disease Forecasting A survey on state and territorial expertise and needs for infectious disease forecasts, models, and other outbreak analytic techniques—implemented by ASTHO with support from CDC’s Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics—revealed that respondents from island jurisdictions experienced several barriers that led to limited use of infectious disease forecasts to inform communication and decision making. Challenges noted include limited software access, limited disease modeling capacity or skills, and lack of uniform reporting systems. Through a discussion-based exercise, workshop participants shared their challenges and considerations for ASTHO and CDC to assist with disease forecasting in the island jurisdictions moving forward. Challenges include but are not limited to: Delays with sending samples to labs and receiving results in a timely manner. Without timely results, it is challenging to take swift action. Lack of staff / staff wearing many hats with limited capacity. In most cases, there is no specific communication plan for disease forecasting within the departments. Communication can be challenging without clear processes and channels. Participants noted the desire for additional disease forecasting training and opportunities for collaboration. They suggested an integrated training session with island epidemiologists and other relevant staff to enhance disease forecasting knowledge and communication, as well as strengthen collaboration. Preparing for and Responding to Climate Events From hurricanes to typhoons to volcanic eruptions, the island jurisdictions are no strangers to the effects of changing climate. Willliam “Brandon” Aydlett, science and operations officer at the National Weather Service, and Shelbi Davis, Senior Analyst on the Environmental Health team at ASTHO, offer the following recommendations to island jurisdictions for preparing and responding to unprecedented climate events, as discussed with workshop participants: Create or update standard operating procedures for various climate related responses unique to the island. Always prepare for a category higher storm than is expected. Consider conducting regular vulnerability assessments to better understand areas where the island or its people may be most susceptible to adverse health impacts from climate events. Jurisdictions can learn from one another and find a sense of camaraderie in their preparedness efforts, much like the workshop participants. For example, one island jurisdiction noted that they currently do not have a warehouse to store equipment but are working on a plan to secure one; another jurisdiction, having recently revamped their warehouse, noted that they could assist their island neighbor in this endeavor and provide lessons learned as well as strategies to help secure a warehouse that will fit their needs. Looking Toward the Future Sharing lessons learned with one another and reflecting on how to apply those learnings in respective communities is crucial. Workshop participants shared their intent to share and utilize resources and information shared throughout the workshop with their leadership and team to begin implementing in their jurisdictions, as well as using strategies and skills learned to enhance partnerships. To all the participants and our Hawaiʻian hosts, we say mahalo. Related Resources Modernizing Infrastructure and Facilities for Readiness and Response | ASTHO PH-HERO Workforce Resource Center | ASTHO ASTHO STAR Center | ASTHO Evidence-Based Strategies to Enhance Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response | JPHMP article yes

This blog describes public health legislation introduced during the Island Areas’ 2024 legislative sessions.

As COVID spread through the country and infection rates rose in every state, many of the the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) received media attention for remaining relatively COVID-free. The USAPI’s unified response in the face of a global pandemic is a history-making tale of collaboration, communication, and partnership. The successes of public health leaders provide important lessons for preventing, preparing for, and responding to future public health emergencies.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exasperated challenges around access to nutritious and affordable foods. In response, the federal government has taken action to increase funding and access to programs to strengthen food security.

Several states and territories, as well as many local governments, are going beyond recommendations and requiring individuals to wear face coverings when they are in public settings and spaces (i.e. grocery stores, retail stores, restaurants, public and private transportation services, parks, etc.). Ongoing research and evidence suggests the relationship between mandatory face coverings and declines in daily COVID-19 growth rates is statistically significant.