Displaying 1-20 of 47 results for

An interview with DELPH scholars Halina Palacios and Nathifa Miller about the importance of developing a strong leadership style, advice for future public health leaders, and using the DiSC Personality Assessment.

A Q&A with DELPH participants James Bell III and Sandy Noel about their experiences in the program and why it is so important to develop your own brand as a leader.

To learn more about how the DELPH program has influenced our scholars’ leadership journey so far, ASTHO spoke with three leaders in the current cohort: Andrea Lowe, director of legislative services at the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; Tiffany Wilson, data analytics branch manager at the Alabama Department of Public Health; and Harold Gil, data science support unit supervisor at the Washington State Department of Health.

An issue that public health wrestles with is how to combat racism as we would any other public health emergency. ASTHO’s board of directors has declared structural racism a public health emergency. And health equity is the number one priority in ASTHO’s strategic plan, which means our staff will prioritize equity work as we support all aspects of our members’ technical assistance and capacity building needs.

Four DELPH participants answer the question, “Which is more important for leadership in health equity: to influence the community to follow the leader’s vision or to influence the community to follow their own vision?”

Get insight into the successes and challenges of integrating race/ethnicity data in public health and future directions in this field.

Building More Equitable Communities Through Public Health Law Dawn Hunter Every week, my husband and I place a grocery order. We shop at an employee-owned supermarket chain known for its workplace culture. Sometimes we order online and pick it up, sometimes we have it delivered, and sometimes we do the shopping ourselves. In any case, we often purchase our groceries without much thinking—if we order online, we are prompted to “buy it again” and even in person we tend to buy the same staples. Prices are higher online than in store. In addition, we live in a community where plastic bags are still an option, but we used to live in a community where plastic bags are banned. Why am I sharing all of this? Nearly every aspect of our weekly grocery trip is shaped by the law. Laws impact: Food placement, packaging, expiration dates, and prices. Employee wages and benefits. Store location, hours, and accessibility. Availability of rideshare drivers for delivery orders. Whether to choose paper or plastic. Law impacts the way we experience our everyday lives by establishing the framework in which we operate. The grocery store is just one example of how law can shape our decisions and, more importantly, our choices. Because it shapes the resources and opportunities available to us, law is an important determinant of health. Exploring the Landscape of Public Health Law What we think of as “law” can take many forms. It includes statutes, regulations, case law, organizational policy, and budgets, and how they are interpreted and enforced. The law can be a set of requirements or prohibitions, establishing norms and expectations for our behavior as individuals, organizations, and systems. The law can also be the processes and procedures associated with creating laws, making decisions, and interpreting existing laws. Public health law, specifically, is important as a field because it includes the laws that are designed to protect and promote the public’s health and that define the power of the government to act on our behalf. In fact, law is behind every public health success of the 20th century. A 1999 issue of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report listed vaccinations, motor vehicle safety, safer workplaces, healthier moms and babies, and recognition of tobacco as a health hazard among those successes. These achievements would not be possible without the law, including: School vaccination laws. Helmet and seatbelt laws. Speed limits. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Food fortification. School lunch programs. The Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program. Newborn screening. The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. Clean indoor air laws. At the same time, these laws have not benefited everyone equally. In fact, they have often operated as a tool of racism and other forms of structural discrimination. The lesson here is that the law can create the conditions that lead to differences in health outcomes, but it can also create the conditions for equity. The Civil Rights Movement and Advances in Health Equity One must look only to the civil rights movement to see the potential. As just one example, today’s robust network of Community Health Centers was born from the activism of the Black Panther Party, which established free health clinics in response to continuing discrimination in the health care system, as well as the work of H. Jack Geiger and Count D. Gibson Jr., who established the first community health centers in 1965. The success of these efforts led to funding for additional community health centers through President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Office of Economic Opportunity as part of his War on Poverty. In fact, key legislation enacted during the civil rights movement led to significant, even if insufficient, improvements in health outcomes for Black Americans. For example, there is evidence that women’s suffrage, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act all led to improvements in premature mortality and infant mortality, among other benefits. The enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010 and the resulting adoption of Medicaid expansion saw similar success. There is ample evidence of the Medicaid expansion impact on health outcomes and financial well-being, both at the individual and population level. Addressing the Training Gaps in Public Health Law for More Equitable Public Health Practice The fact that law shapes how we experience our lives on a day-to-day basis is perhaps the most important reason that public health professionals should understand the relationship between the law and health outcomes and how to use the law to achieve more equitable, thriving communities. However, knowledge of public health law continues to be one of the biggest training gaps in the public health workforce. The 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey, conducted by the de Beaumont Foundation and ASTHO, found that strategic and systems thinking was one of the top training needs as well as an increased interest in policy engagement and topics related to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (visit the 2021 Dashboard). Another report in 2021, “Challenges and Opportunities for Strengthening the US Public Health Infrastructure: Findings From the Scan of the Literature” by the National Network of Public Health Institutes, found a need for increased awareness among the public health workforce of the legal basis for public health authority and identified both how to influence law and policy development and how to understand the effects of law and policy on health among the top training needs. These findings align with public health accreditation standards. Whether or not you work for an accredited health department, the Public Health Accreditation Board Standards and Measures serve as a guidepost for the practice of public health. There are two specific domains where this is relevant: domains 4 and 5, as detailed in Table 1. Padding Block - Medium(10) Table 1. Public Health Accreditation Board Guidance for Equity Domain Measure Examples Domain 4: Strengthen, support, and mobilize communities and partnerships to improve health. Measure 4.1.3 A: Engage with community members to address public health issues and promote health. Making the decision-making structure inclusive and transparent to empower community members or developing mechanisms for shared ownership in the process. Enhancing residents’ capacity to understand levers of power or influence in policy change. Domain 5: Create, champion, and implement policies, plans, and laws that impact health. Measure 5.1.2 A: Examine and contribute to improving policies and laws. Assessment of the impacts of the policy or law on equity. Input gathered from stakeholders or strategic partners. Padding Block - Large(2) Lessons Learned: Involving and Empowering Communities The inclusion of community members in assessment, decision-making, and capacity-building efforts to understand levers of power or influence reinforce key lessons learned in the past three years, spurred by COVID-19 and the racial justice movement of the summer of 2020: The first lesson is the need to recognize and rectify historical injustices. It is important that we understand the historical legal context behind current health inequities. We must know and name the problem to solve it. The second is the need to rectify current inequities by analyzing and assessing the ways in which our current system of laws is creating and reinforcing inequities. The third is the need to engage impacted people in identifying, designing, and implementing solutions. One of the lessons learned from the work of Geiger and Gibson was that there is a difference between what the health system thinks people need and what communities think they need. It seems we are still trying to learn this lesson today. Leveraging Law to Drive Equity and Make Public Health More Trustworthy Law is the only way to truly change the game for inequities. It can give a voice to historically marginalized people by creating pathways to ensure inclusion and representation in the political process. It can also change systems and institutions by changing the way they operate and the way that people within those systems operate. Additionally, it can serve as a tool to enforce conditions that will lead to more equitable outcomes and to hold people in positions of power accountable. We have often heard in the past few years about the need to rebuild trust in public health. I’d like to reframe that to think about how we make public health as a field more trustworthy. It starts by increasing our understanding of the authority of public health to promote the public’s health and to use that authority to create systems in which we all can thrive. article yes

Data modernization improves public health response to emerging health threats and can help address health inequities in the U.S.

Addressing the impact of substance use disorder on pregnant and postpartum individuals: a critical analysis of SUD policy, access to care, and lessons from the field.

Explore the transformative power of community engagement and community power building in public health research, and learn how these initiatives can enhance racial and health equity. Discover strategies for addressing structural determinants of health and empowering communities to drive positive change.

Empowering Community Health Workers to Advance Health Equity ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, community health workers, health equity, covid-19, health inequities, public health infrastructure, public health, public health professionals, public health workforce, healthcare system, advancing health equity, contact tracer, testing treatment, local health department, government agencies, community engagement, advancing equity, advancing equity grant, health and human services, social determinants of health, community partnerships, marketing and outreach, sustainable funding, health outcomes, health department Keon Lewis, Karla Granado, Yoann Sophie Antoine Jean-Felix ASTHO | The importance of recognizing the critical impact of community health workers (CHWs) in advancing health equity, sustaining their partnership with local health departments, and setting them up for success by implementing sustainable funding sources and employing the CHW settings continuum framework. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the health inequities and deficiencies in our public health infrastructure that leave many communities behind. To close the health equity gap and meet the challenges ahead, public health professionals must institutionalize the role of community health workers (CHWs) within the healthcare system and public health workforce. Doing so will take recognizing the critical impact of CHWs and equipping them with the necessary tools for continued success and advancing health equity. Recognizing the Impact of Community Health Workers in the Public Health Workforce Pandemic and Beyond During the peak of the pandemic, local health departments employed CHWs as contact tracers, health educators, and care navigators for individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. CHWs promoted and increased access to testing, treatment, and vaccination. At a time when there was a sense of mistrust towards government agencies and the COVID-19 vaccine, CHWs also educated their communities. As the pandemic continues to subside, local health departments must sustain their partnership with CHWs to close the health equity gap and build a relationship with the communities they serve—thereby enhancing trust and a sense of belonging among residents. With proper training and sustained funding, CHWs will be crucial in bridging the gap between government agencies and promoting community engagement on issues other than COVID-19. Case Study: Advancing Equity Grant When the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) announced its two-year $2.25 billion Advancing Equity Grant (AA466), the funds addressed COVID-19-related health disparities and advanced health equity. One central component of achieving the established deliverables of the grant was assessing participating agencies' ability to expand their capacity to serve historically marginalized populations. The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services was fortunate to receive $39,638,025 in AA466 funding to distribute to 57 participating agencies for joining this worthwhile mission. As one of the 57 recipients, the Cabarrus Health Alliance (CHA) utilized CHWs as trusted liaisons with lived and learned experiences to advance the organizational strategic plan by addressing the social determinants of health. By adopting a deployment model centered on Public Health 3.0, the CHWs effectively launched a referral program that helped close accessibility gaps by improving communication methods, expanding community partnerships, and leveraging technology. Results from satisfactory surveys and client-reported demographics demonstrated that of the nearly 3,000 community stakeholders who served from 2021 to 2023, 68.4% identified with the organization’s priority population. The outcome was immediate improvements in accessibility gaps for county focal areas such as food insecurity, housing instability, unemployment, healthcare access, and transportation. Recognizing the rapid impact of the referral program, CHA implemented a marketing and outreach strategy designed for public viewing and conference platforms to highlight its critical role in strengthening the public health infrastructure. Setting Community Health Workers Up for Success Implementing Sustainable Funding Sources As evidenced by the case study above, CHWs bring invaluable skill sets and experiences that can help achieve public health goals and advance health equity. However, they are undervalued for their contributions to improving health outcomes. Research shows that nearly half of health outcomes can be traced back to one’s zip code and social determinants of health. In Nov. 2023, the White House released the first-ever U.S. Playbook to Address Social Determinants of Health, which lays the foundation for agencies and organizations to provide a holistic approach to health by acknowledging and addressing social and economic conditions that affect well-being. CHWs will be the backbone of these efforts, as they bridge healthcare and social care systems by screening for social determinants of health and connecting individuals to social support—making it easier for patients or community members to navigate complex systems. To continue to support CHWs, there must be broad implementation of sustainable funding sources such as reimbursing CHW services at the Medicaid level. In a survey conducted among employers of CHWs in Texas, only 27% stated that their organization received funding from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, with 25% not receiving any federal funding. Texas is one of many states that will begin to require managed care organizations to reimburse for CHW services. As of Jan. 2024, only 24 states had reimbursement mechanisms for CHW services through managed care organizations, the 1115 demonstration projects, or Medicaid state plan amendments. Employing the CHW Settings Continuum Framework The Community Health Worker Core Consensus (C3) Project provides a setting continuum framework that highlights how a CHW might be employed in a community or clinical setting and, regardless, their role is consistent and rooted in community advocacy and support. Providing CHWs with training tailored to their community and the setting in which they are employed is crucial to their success. CHWs can be integrated at the local health department level, creating a sense of belonging among community members and removing fear of communicating with a government agency. The C3 Project recommends 10 core skills and competencies, from advocacy to communication, research, and evaluation. While CHWs already have a wealth of knowledge about their communities, their impact strengthens when equipped with the proper training to advocate for their community successfully and support long-lasting changes. Conclusion CHWs are vital to the success of public health efforts. They usually have shared lived experiences with the people and communities they serve, which creates a connection essential to advancing equity—as community members rely on individuals, they know they can trust to make informed decisions about their health. Ultimately, CHWs foster stronger relationships between community members, community organizations, local health departments, and healthcare organizations, which are essential to rebuilding trust that historically harmful and racist practices in the public health and healthcare field destroyed. As such, investing in CHWs as the heart of our public health workforce will help to eliminate inequities in health outcomes. website yes

Wraparound Services for All: How Public Health Departments are Connecting Communities to Critical Support ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Officials, wraparound services, astho delph, diverse executives, linkage to care, medical care, health care, community well being, public health, health outcomes, evidence based, quality of life, strength based, local community, health promotion, improvement health, infectious diseases, maternal and child health, local health departments, public health services, mental health services, public health practices, public health leaders, public health systems, behavioral health ASTHO Staff How health departments across the country are working to link clients to diverse public health services and supports to address their specific challenges and help them succeed in different aspects of life. As the heartbeat of community well-being, health departments find strength in collaboration. Services provided by health departments cannot stand alone when supporting their residents and communities significantly, as several simultaneous and interrelated factors can influence health. In this blog post, ASTHO’s DELPH scholars from cohort #3, Tosha Bock and Sam To, share how their organizations across the country are striving to implement systems to link clients to a diverse range of public health services and supports to address their specific challenges and help them succeed in different aspects of life. Give an overview of your organization and the ‘linkage to care’ efforts. TOSHA: The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) is a government agency in Oregon. OHA oversees Oregon’s health-related programs, including behavioral health (addictions and mental health), public health, Oregon State Hospital for individuals requiring secure residential psychiatric care, and the state's Medicaid program called the Oregon Health Plan. The nine-member Oregon Health Policy Board oversees its policy work. OHA’s goal is to eliminate health inequities in Oregon by 2030. Addressing health inequities in Oregon is crucial as it ensures everyone has equal access to healthcare resources regardless of socio-economic status or background, promoting a more just and inclusive society while improving public health outcomes. One way OHA does this is by supporting investments in Community Information Exchange (CIE). CIE is a network of collaborative partners using a multidirectional technology platform to connect people in Oregon to services and support. Through CIE technology, users can search a shared resource directory, document consent, and make and hear back on the referral status (closed loop). Communities across Oregon are implementing CIE. SAM: Within the Division of Preparedness at the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Office of Rapid Response Disease Investigation (ORRDI) was established during the COVID-19 pandemic and launched statewide case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) to support local health jurisdictions (LHJs) with critical investigative support. Soon after, a referral process to connect residents to community organizations was incorporated into all investigations; this provided the ability to directly link residents with vital resources and assistance programs while they navigated their situation. Give an example of the work and why it's impactful. TOSHA: Below is an example of the importance of CIE expressed by a Community-Based Organization interviewed for the CIE: Community Engagement Findings and Recommendations Report. Community-based organizations, peer-run organizations like ours, we are, you know, feet on the ground organizations, we're grassroots, and I think this tool to be able to reach out because we're always underfunded, we're always understaffed, you know, and this cuts down on hours and hours and hours of time that we would be on the phone, we have to do one referral, we can send it out, we can make notes, we can talk back and forth with other people, we only have one consent form, you know, all these things have made it a lot easier for us to operate, making it to where we can spend more time with our feet on the ground. – Interviewee SAM: Throughout Arizona, especially for the state’s most vulnerable populations, isolating or quarantining was found to be a hardship, with adherence to guidance greatly dependent on each individual’s ability to access medical care, attend work, pay for rent and utilities, and to acquire food or medication; those who struggled became a risk for increasing the spread of COVID-19. Community navigators offered a personalized approach to providing services and programs aimed at helping residents achieve self-sufficiency. During one of the most substantial periods of COVID-19 response (between July 2021 and June 2022), ORRDI connected 17,290 cases and 939 contacts to community navigator organizations and successfully administered 18,229 referrals. The top three requested resources across the state were utility assistance, eviction prevention or rental assistance, and emergency food box delivery. This partnership connected various established services and magnified trust with the ORRDI team and within Arizona communities. What do you wish could be done to enhance your programs? TOSHA: CIE networks are foundational to building a more equitable system in Oregon. Additional funding must be provided to implement systems change and expand these networks to create statewide coordination across organizations, sectors, and systems. These investments should also include technical assistance, training, education, and advancing privacy and data protection. SAM: The ADHS ORRDI programs continue to manage COVID-19 CI/CT for much of the state and leverage this partnership to support the needs of Arizona residents affected by COVID-19. However, they have also taken on several other morbidities of public health significance. The objective of the Office is to maintain current community navigator partnerships by offering supportive services, continually improving outreach efforts to cases and contacts, and encouraging enrollment in referrals. Concluding Thoughts In conclusion, breaking down the silos between public health and health care opens avenues for a more holistic approach to community well-being. By simultaneously addressing various determinants of health, organizations can create a comprehensive and interconnected system that fosters lasting improvements. This collaborative effort enhances the effectiveness of interventions and paves the way for a healthier and more resilient community. In embracing this integrated approach, we move closer to a future where the boundaries between public health and health care are blurred, giving rise to a more cohesive and impactful model for community health and wellness. website yes

PHIG: A Transformative Infrastructure Grant for Health Equity and Inclusive Workforces ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, phig grant, infrastructure grant, public health, health equity, public health grant, inclusive workforce, public health infrastructure grant, health departments, public health funding, public health institutes, data systems, public health workforce, community engagement, federal grants, restrict spending, health disparities, community partnership, underserved populations, diversity equity inclusion, educational institutions, high risk and underserved, ethnic minority, rural communities, overall capacity, minority institutions Amber Williams, Lindsey Myers The Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG) program provides flexible, non-categorical funding to help public health departments across the United States build their infrastructure and capacity to meet their unique needs and address barriers in health equity and workforce development. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress made a historic investment in public health workforce and infrastructure, presenting a game-changing opportunity for public health transformation. In the fall of 2022, CDC rolled out a first of its kind, five-year grant program called the Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG) to address critical governmental public health workforce and system improvement needs. This program is all about supporting health departments across our states, territories, and freely associated states to ensure every community has the people, services, and systems needed to promote and protect optimal health for all. Along with funding 107 health departments, CDC also partnered with three organizations: the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the National Network of Public Health Institutes, and the Public Health Accreditation Board to help agencies modernize data systems, recruit and retain a skilled public health workforce, and address longstanding public health infrastructure needs. Challenges in Public Health Funding and the Pivotal Introduction of PHIG The majority of public health department funding comes from topic-specific federal grants, which usually restrict spending to prescribed programmatic activities and do not allow agencies to build foundational capabilities—like improving hiring or procurement processes, communication, and community engagement. For example, while advancing health equity and addressing health disparities is often emphasized as a central goal of public health practice, many jurisdictions face barriers to fully incorporating health equity into their strategies. Additionally, the public health workforce often does not reflect the communities they serve, which can impact their ability to build community partnerships and fully respond to the needs of underserved populations. PHIG is different in that it provides flexible, non-categorical funding that health departments can use to build their infrastructure and capacity to meet their unique needs and address barriers. PHIG Impact: Advancing Health Equity and Promoting Inclusion in Public Health Agencies Many agencies are using their PHIG funding to boost efforts to tackle health disparities in their jurisdictions and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within their agencies. Internally they are focusing on examining compensation, assessing equitable pay, developing leadership programs for staff of color, streamlining hiring processes, and assuring unbiased hiring practices. Some agencies are creating paid internships, hiring people with lived experience, and building new workforce pipelines through engagements with minority-serving educational institutions. Plus, they are training managers and staff to create more inclusive workplace environments and partner with and serve diverse communities better. Other approaches include: Taking lessons learned from other funded programs, such as the National Initiative to Address COVID-19 Health Disparities Among Populations at High-Risk and Underserved, Including Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations and Rural Communities grant, to focus and build on successes. Strengthening the overall capacity of the agency to address health equity, such as by incorporating health equity into agency-wide performance improvement offices and ensuring equity principles are embedded in health assessments and strategic plans. Improving partnerships with community organizations—looking at opportunities to simplify processes; support minority-owned institutions in competing for and managing federal funding; and hiring new staff dedicated to health equity, liaisons with special populations including tribes, and community health workers. This is a remarkable time for public health. Improving public health infrastructure and strengthening the workforce will lead to better health outcomes for all. These grants are critical, providing much-needed funding and flexibility to make real progress in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workforce and ensuring health equity in public health strategies. Author card spacing 2 Related Content-Blog - DELPH Magazine 3 OE22-2203 PHIG website yes

DELPH Reflections: A Journey Towards Creating a More Equitable and Just Democracy Fredrick Echols DELPH has helped public health professionals reflect on their purpose, cultivate compassionate leadership, understand system dynamics, and build a community of advocates to create a more equitable and just democracy. As an African-American male living in the United States, I have encountered numerous obstacles in life, particularly in my efforts to reform systems that fail to support marginalized and vulnerable populations. These systems have had devastating effects on myself and other individuals belonging to Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities as they restrict access to essential health and social services. As a Black physician and public health professional, I continue to encounter this stark reality that engenders a sense of hopelessness in communities across the United States. These systems obscure their true intentions and deceive individuals into believing that they operate in the best interest of marginalized populations while perpetuating inequitable and disparate health outcomes. In consideration of these personal and professional experiences, the Diverse Executives Leading in Public Health (DELPH) program has played a significant role in shaping my career and purpose: Fostering Critical Reflection: It provided me with a journey that encouraged me to think critically about my future and how I can leverage my platforms and relationships to help propel the public health ecosystem toward a system that embraces the humanity of all individuals and prioritizes uplifting and empowering the most vulnerable and marginalized populations. Important note: That said, the presence of silos, political posturing, and missed opportunities due to inefficient and ineffective operational practices resulting from insufficient fiscal investment continue to plague the public health ecosystem—limiting its ability to make strides toward a system that wholeheartedly supports the pursuit of health equity and social justice. Cultivating Compassionate Leadership: The program also provided access to experts and public health thought leaders who helped my colleagues and I understand the evolution of health and social service delivery in the United States (particularly for indigent populations), increase our capacity to embrace divergent thinking, and engage in constructive dialogue. The availability of such a space provided us with an opportunity to establish a secure and conducive environment, one that upheld the virtues of compassionate leadership and fostered effective relationship building. Our ability to engage with stakeholders, both like-minded and those with differing opinions, was characterized by a spirit of intentional listening that sought to comprehend their perspectives. Through this, we were able to create an atmosphere that supported open dialogue and nurtured mutual understanding. Understanding System Dynamics: The experience has enriched my comprehension of the intricacies that drive the amplification of inequality and the resulting health disparity gaps that are pervasive among communities and individuals across the nation. The knowledge thus obtained is of paramount importance to ensure my competency in identifying and avoiding perpetuating the issues that I aspire to address. This, in turn, will prevent any inadvertent harm to the communities I seek to uplift and empower. Building a Community of Advocates: Moreover, the program has enabled me to connect with individuals who are unwavering in their commitment to upholding justice. Despite our diverse backgrounds, we set aside cultural differences to work toward a common goal: the accessibility of quality healthcare and the delivery of justice for all humanity. The DELPH program's fundamental principles and culturally sensitive support structure have played an instrumental role in shaping my professional growth as a public health expert. As I chart the course for my future professional endeavors, I intend to leverage the lessons learned and the tools provided by DELPH to strengthen the public health ecosystem. My ultimate goal is to foster collaboration across various segments of society to create a more equitable, just democracy. The DELPH program has equipped me with invaluable knowledge and skills that will enable me to make meaningful contributions to society's betterment. For this, I express my profound gratitude to the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the Morehouse School of Medicine's Satcher Leadership Institute, and CDC for their unwavering commitment to advancing BIPOC leadership in public health. Their steadfast support for this program has enabled me and countless others to acquire the skills and knowledge necessary to effectively lead and drive the transformative change that public health requires. I sincerely appreciate their continued investment in this vital initiative, which has empowered many to become the change agents that public health needs. website yes

Prioritize the mental health and well-being of public health workers who face stress and burnout due to their work; read about practical strategies for improving workplace wellness and the impact of declining workforce well-being on public health initiatives.

Raising awareness about superbugs and promoting a health equity approach to combat them.

Utilizing diverse perspectives allows for public health leaders to better serve their communities through leadership development.

It has never been more important for public health to better understand the disability community and quickly build skills and resources to better serve them, which makes it critical to include more people living with disabilities in the public health workforce.

Reprioritizing Black Maternal Health How We Can Prioritize Black Maternal Health Lawrence Young Black women face significant rates of maternal morbidity and mortality — learn how public health can better support them in this blog post. I do not have to look far to understand the urgency of the Black maternal health crisis. I have watched friends, colleagues, and loved ones from every walk of life struggle through pregnancies that should have been safe and celebrated. Some are highly educated professionals. Others are young mothers still finding their way. Many had access to quality insurance and still faced complications, long hospital stays, and minimal follow-up care. Many have shared unfortunate experiences that run the gamut from feeling unheard or perhaps unnecessarily undergoing a procedure — the care in health care was not there for them. These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a larger, structural failure that demands our attention and our action. As public health professionals, we must ask ourselves: How can we better care for and about Black mothers? And what would it look like to center them in the systems that were created to protect women in one of the most vulnerable times of their lives? Understanding the Root of the Crisis Black women in the United States are three to four times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than their White counterparts. In many states, including Connecticut, this difference persists even when controlling for education and income. These outcomes are not the result of individual choices or biological differences — they are the result of systems designed with historical blind spots. Education and income, often seen as protective factors, do not shield Black women from these outcomes. Research shows that pregnancy-related mortality rates are higher among Black women with a college degree than among White women with the same level of education or with less than a high school diploma. The same is true for women with respect to the risk of dying within the first year postpartum. These disparities grow with age and extend beyond mortality to include severe maternal morbidity, such as preeclampsia — a pregnancy complication related to high blood pressure — which can have lasting health impacts if untreated including death. Additionally, American Indian, Alaska Native, Black, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Asian, and Hispanic women all experience higher rates of ICU admission during delivery compared to White women. ICU admission is considered a key marker for maternal complications and system-level failure. Public Health as Partner in Progress Public health has a responsibility to do more than document issues and concerns. We must be in the business of addressing them. In Connecticut, we are working across agencies and community organizations to move from acknowledgment to action. One of the most important leaders in this work is #Day43, an initiative launched by Waterbury Bridge to Success Community Partnership. The name refers to the period between 43 days and one year postpartum, during which approximately 20% of pregnancy-related deaths occur. #Day43 exists to raise awareness of Black maternal health and transform systems to support mothers. Their work spans research, advocacy, policy, technical assistance, and storytelling grounded in lived experience. Waterbury’s maternal health data reflects this crisis. According to the #Day43 Black Maternal Health Report, 18.6% of pregnant women in Waterbury received late or no prenatal care. Those in the city face higher rates of C-sections, limited access to postpartum care, and insufficient support for mental health and breastfeeding. The community described a significant lack of maternity care resources, particularly in the North End, where many Black and Hispanic families reside. Through initiatives like this, residents are not just seen as stakeholders. They are recognized as storytellers, system builders, and agents of change. Their leadership is shaping how we define, measure, and deliver maternal care in Connecticut. This vision aligns with broader maternal health equity efforts across the state. For example, The Connecticut Health Foundation is developing a Maternal Health Equity Blueprint in partnership with community leaders, researchers, and families. Waterbury voices are essential contributors to this process. Listening as a Path of Healing The experiences of Black mothers reflect a broader truth. Too often, our systems are not built to hear them. That lack of trust is both historical and current. It shows up in rushed appointments, dismissed symptoms, and inaccessible services. Community-based providers, such as doulas and midwives of color, are critical to bridging this gap. They do more than provide care — they restore dignity. Yet these providers are often underfunded and undervalued in mainstream health care systems. Public health must champion integrating these providers into existing systems and promoting long-term sustainability. To maximize maternal health outcomes, the next phase of this work must intentionally include structured cross-sector collaboration. It must focus on building systems that educate both providers and families on urgent maternal warning signs, provide consistent discharge education, and strengthen local surveillance and outreach infrastructure. These strategies are essential, scalable, and lifesaving. We cannot improve outcomes without acknowledging the deep cultural, emotional, and psychological work required to rebuild trust. We cannot heal what we do not hear. Re-Examining the “Public” in Public Health Re-examining the public in public health means placing the needs of our most vulnerable communities at the center. It means investing in care that is integrative and supportive with community co-designed solutions. It also means wholistically addressing other intersecting systems that influence maternal outcomes. We can start by: Expanding funding for community-based perinatal health workers, including doulas and midwives. Embedding relevant metrics into maternal health program design and evaluation. Creating statewide listening sessions and family advisory councils to ensure policies reflect lived realities. Partnering across sectors to improve access to safe housing, transportation, and mental health supports for new mothers. Supporting local initiatives like #Day43 that lead from within communities and reflect community-defined solutions. Educating families on health information and individual health rights through accessible, trusted channels. To truly care for and about Black mothers, we must act beyond awareness months and social media campaigns. We must improve current processes and design opportunities that will support them and keep them alive. Public health was created to serve the public. The most powerful way to honor that mission is to focus on the public, ensuring they are a priority and not an afterthought. article yes

Learn more about DELPH Cohort 3 participants.