This brief dives into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ability of people with disabilities to access vital health care services during the public health emergency.
Read a detailed summary of the FY26 Senate Appropriations Bill, which was released on July 31.
The Senate released its version of the FY25 LHHS appropriation bill on August 1, 2024, with significant changes in proposed public health funding than the House's proposed bill.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health authority has been used to require the use of face masks and encourage social distancing, and other measures. In several states these legal authorities have been challenged and, in many jurisdictions, limited or eliminated by the legislature. Maintaining the legal authority to prevent and control the spread of infectious disease is crucial to preparing for and addressing disease outbreaks.
Learn about health legislative priorities through the end of 2025, related to Medicaid and Medicare, the Affordable Care Act, site-neutral payments, and more.
Federal funding that supports public healthy emergency preparedness is critical. Read the latest on PAHPA and more in the Health Policy Update.
Discover how improving public health data infrastructure can create more robust care for people with disabilities in this blog post.
Learn about the importance of including animals in emergency planning in this blog post.
Workforce Trends in Public Health Preparedness Workforce Trends in Public Health Preparedness Kelsey Tillema, Adrianna Evans Learn about ongoing changes to the public health preparedness workforce and how to best support these workers. Public health preparedness professionals fulfill critical functions in the event of a public health emergency, such as coordinating emergency response planning, managing incident command structures, and ensuring readiness for a multitude of threats. This essential group of workers faces significant strain, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated major workforce changes within public health. The prolonged emergency response intensified staff burnout and increased turnover, prompting many professionals to retire or even leave the field. New data shows the public health preparedness workforce specifically is less tenured and navigating unique challenges when it comes to shifts in funding and policy priorities. When it comes to who’s behind the scenes of preparedness and response, it’s crucial to consider how to maintain an engaged workforce capable of scaling, coordinating, and sustaining response operations under pressure. The Workforce Landscape According to the 2024 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey, the preparedness workforce makes up roughly 13% of the state and local public health workforce. Of these approximately 30,000 workers, nearly a quarter (23%) are age 35 or younger, and another quarter (28%) are 55 and older. Although this is not unique to the preparedness workforce, this reflects an aging workforce as experienced staff approach retirement and new professionals enter the field. Further, about half of preparedness health agency staff (49%) have been with their agency for less than five years. Considering this transition, health agencies may face the loss of institutional knowledge related to emergency operations, incident command structures, and preparedness and response protocols. As experienced professionals exit the workforce, this may also create gaps in mentorship, leadership, and overall response experience. However, like the rest of the public health workforce, most preparedness staff (73%) show commitment to staying with their organizations for at least the next year. Preparedness staff cited benefits, job stability, and supportive coworkers as their main reasons for staying. On the other hand, the top reasons for leaving are pay, organizational culture/climate, and lack of opportunities for advancement. To gain insight into gaps within the workforce’s expertise, preparedness leaders may want to consider partnering with their agency’s internal workforce development team to conduct a workforce assessment within their program. Regularly assessing a preparedness team’s skillset and needs can give greater clarity on how to best support team development and growth. Agency leadership can create cohesion between tenured and new professionals by offering or supporting both formal and informal mentorship, and establishing avenues to create familiarity with response systems, interagency coordination, and real-world experience. Newer professionals may bring fresh perspectives and diverse skillsets to the workforce but need support from tenured staff to become well-versed in the preparedness sector. At this juncture, succession planning and supporting career advancement pathways are essential components to building up the next generation of leaders in public health preparedness. Knowledge Transfer and New Skills Whether responding to pandemics, natural disasters, or radiological events, working in preparedness requires strategic and cross-disciplinary capabilities that go beyond traditional emergency response. During a public health emergency, staff must rapidly activate response plans, coordinate across agencies, and make high-stakes decisions. Since evidence shows that many workers are new to the field, it’s crucial to ensure that staff are continuously learning internal systems and building preparedness-specific skills. Both new and rising preparedness staff members need a variety of skills to make informed decisions and grow within their organizations. Areas such as administrative preparedness, navigation of policy and legislative processes, and leadership development are all key to creating a cohesive internal workforce system. Leadership skills are crucial for preparedness staff, who must coordinate across agencies, communicate crisis and risk information to a variety of audiences, and operate within the Incident Command System. Other important and emerging topical considerations for skill expansion include data analytics, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, multimedia risk communication, and specialized areas of preparedness (e.g., accessibility, radiation readiness, climate and animal health), to name a few. While some of this knowledge can be passed on through mentorship or job experience, staff should also have access to structured, high-quality learning opportunities. Continuing education courses, certificate programs, and tuition reimbursement can all support staff development. Policy and Funding Considerations Internal workforce policies have significant influence on an agency’s workforce retention, morale, and skill building. Beyond salary, policies related to flexible working arrangements, paid training time, career advancement opportunities, and recognition and well-being programs all contribute to how supported staff feel in their roles. Agency leadership can also assess their broader levels of policy, such as student loan repayment and tuition assistance, to make preparedness careers more competitive and accessible. Externally, public health preparedness programs rely heavily on federal funding streams such as the Public Health Emergency Preparedness cooperative agreement and the Hospital Preparedness Program. As a result, preparedness hiring and turnover cycles can be influenced by grant timelines. As federal priorities shift, this uncertainty can make it challenging for agencies to sustain long-term workforce investments and main continuity of operations. Many agencies are exploring ways to adapt, using strategies to braid and layer funding streams to stabilize staff, while others use supplemental funds such as the Public Health Infrastructure Grant to invest in foundational capabilities and workforce development beyond just preparedness activities. Preparing for the Future Agencies have an opportunity to address the primary drivers of attrition and strengthen the preparedness workforce. Expanding workforce development opportunities internally and externally will help to maintain institutional knowledge and prepare the workforce for evolving modern day threats. While the future of public health preparedness does rely on funding and policy, it also relies on skilled, committed workers. As the workforce landscape continues to evolve, investing in the development, retention, and lifting up of a generation of new leaders will determine how effectively we respond to future crises. Learn more about strategies and resources to support the public health preparedness workforce from ASTHO’s Inspire Readiness Workforce page and the ASTHO Workforce Resource Center. ASTHO will continue to share promising practices to support preparedness staff. Reviewed by - Allen, Peterson article yes
Learn how Michigan has applied lessons learned a year later from a radiological exercise in this blog post.
Exercise Excellence: Michigan Reflects on a National Level Exercise Exercise Excellence: Michigan Reflects on a National Level Exercise Adrianna Evans Learn how Michigan's health department collaborated with state and federal partners for a radiation preparedness exercise. In March 2025, the Department of Energy hosted a national level exercise designed to promote radiation readiness. This exercise, called Cobalt Magnet 25, brought together a wide variety of interdisciplinary partners from federal, state, local, and international governments, among other partners. Michigan hosted the exercise. ASTHO’s Director of Preparedness, Adrianna (Annie) Evans, sat down with representatives from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) to learn about their experiences with Cobalt Magnet 25, how they’ve applied lessons learned one year later, and how those lessons might be applied to different threats. This blog post will be the first in a series “Exercise Excellence” that shares insights and perspectives from emergency preparedness exercises. This first blog post will share insights from Michigan on Cobalt Magnet 25 overall preparation, planning, collaboration, and more. Tell us about your experience with Cobalt Magnet 25. Jason Smith, Emergency Management Coordinator: While Michigan State Police, our state’s emergency management agency, took a key role with the U.S. Department of Energy on lead exercise planning, MDHHS served as lead exercise planner, player, and co-chaired a public health and environment working group alongside partners from Ontario and the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. MDHHS leveraged this opportunity to initiate internal play and engage local public health and health care partners across the region. This included representation from two health care coalitions, five local health departments, and four major health care systems — many of which were outside the directly affected communities for this scenario. MDHHS activated our emergency coordination center. Overall, the Cobalt Magnet 25 Full Scale Exercise featured over a thousand injects emphasizing field sampling, decontamination, and reception centers. Our participation spanned preparedness, laboratory, environmental health, behavior health, disability health, and communications, including our public information officers. This experience strengthened cross-jurisdictional coordination and enhanced MDHHS's operational readiness for radiological incidents. Terra Riddle, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Response: From my perspective, Cobalt Magnet 25 was impressive. Each player jurisdiction had the opportunity to make the exercise meaningful. It was really great to see all the partners come together and how each jurisdiction worked through these scenarios. It was unique in the communications world due to the depth, richness, and realness of the exercise play. Jay Fiedler, Director, Bureau of Emergency Preparedness, EMS, and Systems of Care: I participated when the larger group convened as part of the planning process. I hadn't seen something like this before in an exercise of this caliber. One of those activities was a briefing held for departmental leadership of state and federal agencies leading into the full exercise. I also served in the response coordinator role in our Community Health Emergency Coordination Center during the exercise itself. What was the preparation and planning process like for this exercise? Fiedler: This was roughly a yearlong planning process facilitated by a federal contractor, but it required extensive engagement with our state and federal partners. Jason worked in regular planning meetings and activities throughout that year. Some ways that the players were pulled together in meetings leading up to the exercise were really valuable for creating partnerships. Our partners from Ontario joined us. We don’t always get to work with them. That helped facilitate enthusiasm for the exercise itself and enhanced coordination between all the players involved. Smith: In addition to the exercise planning itself, the beauty of Michigan hosting Cobalt Magnet 25 was the opportunity to capitalize on existing trainings, whether it be through Counter Terrorism Operations Support, general radiological emergency preparedness training, and programs through CDC — primarily their public health decision-making course for radiological emergencies. There was a lot of training going on behind the scenes to build up awareness and capacity over the year. I thought the education opportunities made the exercise itself a success. Riddle: I'm glad you mentioned that, Jason, because it brought up another thought about the in-depth training led by the federal partners in the communications world. They invited our partners at the state and local levels to participate in radiological and communications training that was pretty niche. Our partners appreciated that this training prepared them for the exercise and it has spurred lot of conversation since about where we go next. This type of scenario requires a lot of collaboration with government agencies across levels of government, different fields, and even other countries. How did you manage that collaboration and what lessons did you learn? Riddle: The big takeaway is that trust built before a crisis sustains coordination during a crisis. This exercise required management across local, state, federal, and international partners with clear roles, consistent communication channels, and shared objectives early on. Fiedler: The pre-meetings were a unique aspect of this exercise and the connections built were really valuable. I hadn't seen that until an exercise of this scope and scale, but will be helpful going forward as we think about how we work and plan exercises as a whole. Smith: One lesson learned was that there is a bigger appetite for training, both in our department and local partners. Michigan has three nuclear power plants. That prevailing threat does build some desire for general awareness throughout the state, particularly among our 45 health departments. We also realized we need to work a little bit more collaboratively with our environmental partners, our agricultural partners, and have a more unified response effort. Riddle: If I can add, there's always an appetite for training and for support for our local partners, but Cobalt Magnet 25 brought visibility into different types of training. Jason explored radiological training. We explored communications training. Now I wonder all the time if there is a partner that could offer new trainings that we haven’t done before. What’s next for MI? Does MI have any other upcoming exercises — radiological/nuclear or otherwise — that you’re looking forward to? Smith: We’re focusing on a comprehensive overhaul of our response plans — not only our radiological nuclear hazards, but also for other functional and hazard specific annexes. In February 2026, we worked with our emergency management agency, local health departments, and health care coalition partners on a severe weather functional exercise. We also have a few workshops and tabletops scheduled for spring 2026 on volunteer management and vector-borne diseases. Additionally, we're prioritizing One Health coordination and formal agreements with agriculture and environmental agencies to strengthen collaboration across the quality-of-life sector. Lastly, we have a climate change tabletop exercise planned in partnership with environmental health teams within MDHHS. These initiatives reflect our commitment to building resilience across multiple hazards while continuing to advance radiological preparedness. Riddle: The depth of relationships continue to be a leading priority. Regardless of the emergency, our teams working together will be our strength. We're all interconnected and that plays into different activities. For example, our patient movement work, which inherently has many partners and requires close coordination like we saw with Cobalt Magnet 25. Exercise Excellence - Radiation Resources article yes
State Policy Trends in Cybersecurity and Public Health Preparedness Maggie Nilz Learn how states are including cybersecurity in their emergency preparedness work in this Health Policy Update. Cybersecurity is an increasingly important component of public health preparedness as state cybersecurity policy intersects with public health agency responsibilities. Public health agencies rely on interconnected digital systems and critical infrastructure for disease surveillance, laboratory reporting, emergency communications, and health data management, making cybersecurity critical to maintaining these functions. Beyond compromising sensitive data and potentially harming patients, cyber incidents can disrupt essential public health services, including emergency response operations. Health care data breaches have steadily increased over the last 15 years, highlighting growing risks for government and health systems. A recent report showed that more than 7,000 health care data breaches were reported to the Department of Health and Human Services since 2009, and reported HIPAA data breaches in 2023 were nearly double the number recorded in 2018. Meanwhile, preparedness capacity has lagged: as of 2022, only 13% of local health departments reported being prepared for cyber-related disruptions, and recent scans show cybersecurity is rarely included in emergency preparedness planning. In response at the federal level, HHS recently announced it is undoing a 2024 reorganization by returning department-wide technology responsibilities to the Office of the Chief Information Officer while refocusing the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on improving nationwide health IT interoperability and data sharing. In recent years, state and territorial legislatures have begun to address these gaps by incorporating cybersecurity into preparedness, health care oversight, and statewide governance structures. These legislative trends signal a need to integrate cybersecurity into emergency operations plans, strengthen cross-sector coordination, and safeguard the continuity of public health services. Some of the most recent policies considered and enacted by legislatures treat cyber incidents as emergencies, expand reporting requirements, and strengthen cyber governance. Cyber Incidents Are Being Built into Emergency Preparedness Frameworks In response to these growing threats, jurisdictions have begun incorporating cyber response into emergency plans and strategies, reinforcing cybersecurity as essential to preparedness. These developments highlight growing awareness that cyber incidents can disrupt critical services, much like natural disasters. In 2025, New York enacted S 7672, which requires municipal entities and public authorities report cybersecurity incidents and demands for ransom to the state Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services. In addition, it directs the Director of the Office of Information Services to establish cybersecurity training and protection standards for state systems as well as require cybersecurity training for state and local government employees. Virginia is currently considering HB 83, which would establish a volunteer Cyber Civilian Corps within the state IT agency to provide rapid assistance during cybersecurity incidents affecting municipalities, nonprofits, education, and critical infrastructure. Preparedness efforts also extend beyond legislation to executive action. In February 2026, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz authorized $1.2 million in state disaster assistance to support response efforts and restore critical systems in response to a cyber incident that disrupted digital services in Saint Paul on July 29, 2025. Additionally, the National Governors Association has included cybersecurity as a primary consideration for planning and preparedness in their latest edition of the Public Health Emergency Playbook. Health care and Public Health Critical Sectors Are Facing New Cyber Requirements Beyond emergency response frameworks, jurisdictions are also adopting cybersecurity reporting and planning requirements for health care and public health organizations. Companion bills in Tennessee (HB 511/SB 555) would require health care providers and facilities to notify their contracted health insurers of cybersecurity incidents. In Maine, LD 2103 would require hospitals to adopt cybersecurity plans to protect patient data and maintain operations, and must include cybersecurity training for employees and board members. New Jersey is looking to adopt and implement a more comprehensive cybersecurity plan across all sectors. This session, legislators have introduced at least two cyber security bills: A 3231 would require “sensitive businesses” (defined as those engaged in financial, essential infrastructure, or health care industries) to report cybersecurity incidents to the New Jersey Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Cell (NJCCIC) when they are aware of their occurrence and would require NJCCIC to conduct a cybersecurity audit within 30 days of notification. A 3283 would require the same “sensitive businesses” to implement cybersecurity programs in accordance with standards adopted by NJCCIC and certify compliance annually. As states expand reporting and cybersecurity requirements, these obligations may intersect with public health reporting and continuity planning. States Are Strengthening Government Cyber Governance and Coordination In addition to sector-specific requirements, jurisdictions are also strengthening the governance structures responsible for coordinating cybersecurity, improving their ability to respond to large-scale incidents affecting public systems. Legislation enacted recently in Texas and California aim to improve coordination among state government by establishing a state agency centralizing cybersecurity incident prevention and response (Texas HB 150) and mandating the development of a cybersecurity playbook to strengthen information sharing (California AB 979). A 2024 bill enacted in Puerto Rico (PC 1530) requires commonwealth agencies to develop and implement a cybersecurity program, which must include a yearly risk assessment as well as vulnerability assessment. At least three jurisdictions are currently considering bills strengthening established cybersecurity programs, with two states recently passing legislation. Utah recently enacted a bill authorizing the Utah Cyber Center to conduct voluntary cybersecurity risk assessments for critical infrastructure and coordinate with government entities on infrastructure safety (HB 165). Utah also enacted legislation creating a specific funding stream for the Center to use for various activities, including implementing a statewide cybersecurity plan and conducting assessments for governmental entities (SB 123). Kansas enacted HB 2574, which would require chief information security officers for the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to adopt cybersecurity programs based on a nationally recognized standard for governmental entities. Finally, Florida recently passed SB 7024, which would expand the state’s public record exemption to include risk assessments, information related to cybersecurity breaches, and information related to data protection, ensuring the confidentiality of sensitive cybersecurity information held by state agencies; the bill is with the governor for final consideration. Key Takeaways for Preparedness Leaders Cybersecurity is critical for preparedness across multiple policy areas, and requires new planning, coordination, and oversight responsibilities. By including cyber incidents into disaster frameworks, standards for health care organizations, and governance, preparedness leaders may find themselves more directly engaged in integrating cybersecurity into emergency operations, exercises, and cross-sector partnerships. For state and territorial health agencies beginning to incorporate cybersecurity into their preparedness plans, agencies such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency provide jurisdictional support and resources to guide this work. article yes
Learn how the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act impacts public health emergency readiness and proposed changes to this legislation.
Communicating the Health Risks of Wildland Fire Smoke Communicating the Health Risks of Wildland Fire Smoke Kerry Wyss, Ali Aslam Learn how state agencies effectively communicate the dangers of wildfire smoke to local communities in this report. Wildfires continue to be a growing risk across large swathes of North America, one of the largest effects of these fires being severe smoke. Smoke from wildland fires — wildfire and prescribed burns — can pose serious health risks to communities, particularly for sensitive or vulnerable populations such as children, older adults, and those with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions. Wildfire smoke can spread rapidly over long distances, so timely and accurate risk communication is essential during wildfire events to help communities understand the dangers of smoke exposure and take protective actions. ASTHO hosted a wildland fire focus group in January 2025 to talk through lessons learned by state and territorial health and environmental agencies in managing wildland fire response. The group identified needs to improve community health in wildland fire response through health risk communication, disseminating information, and developing programs to support public health action (i.e., exposure reduction). Learn more about these takeaways and actionable strategies for wildland fire response in the full report. Get the Report (PDF) article yes
Building a Resilience Framework in Colorado Creating Resilient Communities in Colorado Heather Tomlinson, Kerry Wyss Learn how Colorado public health is building community and cross-sector partnerships to build community resilience. Following the 2012 wildfire season and the 2013 Colorado Floods, Colorado recognized the opportunity to better prepare for natural disasters and coordinate efforts across state agencies to build resilience into their regular operations. In 2015, Colorado became the first state to develop a resilience framework and created the Colorado Resiliency Office (CRO) with the goal of building more resilient systems in the face of shocks and stressors. The Colorado Resiliency Working Group (CRWG) is an interagency group that meets on a quarterly basis to collaboratively implement and advance resilience actions and goals. The Colorado Resilience Framework serves as interagency guidance on strengthening resilience and emphasizes finding co-benefits across community sectors, reducing community risk and vulnerability to disruptions, and supporting the state in anticipating and preparing for current and future conditions. The framework is updated every five years to adapt priorities and to keep up with current conditions. Changes from 2015 to 2020 included a shift from focusing heavily on long-term recovery to taking a more holistic approach to resilience. The CRWG is currently working on the 2025 update with a focus on statewide vulnerability where they can have the most impact and prepare for future conditions with available resources. They are also focusing on clear metrics and being able to communicate progress effectively. The state also created a statutory definition of resilience, which has helped with coordination across long- term projects and agencies. Coordination with Partners Resiliency work in Colorado is greatly enhanced by working with a wide range of partners that bring their subject matter expertise to the table. As a state with strong local control, Colorado has prioritized working collaboratively with local partners, providing technical assistance and subject matter expertise to support their work on the ground, from planning support to targeted grant programs. This collaboration helps ensure continuity from the state to the local communities. Colorado’s approach to resilience ensures resilience is integrated within its many agencies. For example, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has continued to evolve and advance their agency’s resiliency work. Beginning March 2025, CDPHE developed a monthly internal working group to funnel knowledge into resilience leadership across CDPHE — including environmental health, chronic disease, environmental justice, disease and public health, and air pollution. Their goal is to build partnerships across internal programs and state agencies. The CRO was first established in the Governor's Office and moved to the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) in 2018. This move strengthened continuity of its long-term work and, given Colorado’s strong local control governance structure, enabled the CRO to further the goals of building a more resilient Colorado by partnering with and supporting local governments with planning and technical assistance to build greater resilience. The CRO offers flexible Future-Ready Technical Assistance Opportunities for state agencies, which helps them apply adaptability and future-visioning lenses to their resiliency principles in programs and operations. To involve the wider network of resilience practitioners within communities across the state, the CRO launched a community of practice on LinkedIn to foster peer-to-peer learning and dialogue and ensure all voices are heard in a collaborative environment. The Governor’s Office of Climate Preparedness and Disaster Recovery (CPO), facilitates cross agency coordination and collaboration while driving proactive state-wide climate preparedness priorities and supports development of the state’s disaster recovery capacity and capabilities. The CPO also coordinates efforts to ensure that the state budget and legislative processes reflect statewide climate preparedness, disaster recovery, and resilience priorities and leads the development of Colorado’s Climate Preparedness Roadmap — a strategic guiding document updated every three years that uses the best available science and data to prioritize near-term climate adaptation actions across Colorado state government. In collaboration with the implementing state agencies, the first Roadmap, released in 2023, set achievable near-term action items ensuring clear steps to strengthen climate resilience and adaptation. Among the actions, the Roadmap outlined the need to tackle extreme heat through a collaborative interagency approach, while better understanding the unique ways that heat affects Colorado. Social and community capacity were also outlined in the framework as a priority. CDPHE has worked with the Governor's Office to evaluate best practices and strategies tailored for each unique region and implemented their first heat plan in 2024. Extreme heat can be deadly and is projected to continue to intensify. CPO takes the lead in coordinating extreme heat work across agencies. They are partnering with the Colorado State Forest Service to pilot solutions such as climate-smart tree planting to help keep people safe during high-heat events by reducing ambient neighborhood temperatures and shading individual homes to lower indoor temperatures and reduce cooling costs for residents. Building Disaster Recovery Capacity Colorado is investing in disaster preparedness and recovery capacity to reduce the impacts of disasters, help communities recover more effectively, and build resilience into recovery efforts. Ensuring strong recoveries allows for the integration of strategic investments in resilience and hazard mitigation, which the state did in partnership with Xcel Energy — in the wake of the Marshall Fire, the state provided financial assistance to rebuild home to high performance standards and integrated wildfire mitigation actions during the rebuild process. In recent years, Colorado has expanded their recovery investments, including the addition of key positions in targeted recovery areas including within CPO, at DOLA within the Division of Housing and within the Division of Local Government, at the Colorado Department of Agriculture, and at the Department of Public Health and Environment. Technical expertise and capacity at the agency level is leveraged to strengthen preparedness and to support recovery from state declared disasters through the Colorado Department of Public Safety's State Recovery Task Force, providing recovery expertise when activated according to their assigned Recovery Support Function (RSF). Colorado partnered with FEMA’s State Technical Assistance for Recovery Strategies Program to develop processes and strategies that can be integrated into the RSF plan updates within the State Emergency Operations Plan, and to refine RSF functions, capabilities, and partnerships. Over the last year, the state has additionally conducted numerous discussion-based exercises to strengthen RSF relationships and operational capability. The state continues to identify and enhance new opportunities in supporting local communities with pre- disaster recovery technical assistance. Examples include: Hosting Department of Public Safety-led regional recovery symposiums. Piloting additional focused recovery workshops that prioritize rural and less resourced communities. Developing and refining disaster recovery planning tools. Offering recovery and resilience toolkits and expertise to local governments led by DOLA. Strengthening integration of disaster considerations into local planning processes. Colorado implemented this work in summer 2025 when the state experienced numerous wildfires in short succession that received state disaster declarations, activation of the State Recovery Task Force, and required close state-local disaster recovery coordination. Ensuring strong recovery capacity and capabilities is critical to long-term resilience, enabling communities to recover more quickly, more completely, and in ways that integrate proactive resilience strategies. A Path Towards Long-Term Sustainability A key element in Colorado’s long-term approach to building resiliency is closely involving the local community. Building robust community planning and response capabilities at the local level allows for agencies to tailor plans to community needs and ensures everyone is engaged in the process. The CRO, in collaboration with state agency partners in the CRWG, developed the Guidance for Local Government Climate Adaptation, which provides comprehensive guidance, funding resources, case studies, and connections to state and federal programs that can provide support in over 25 implementable actions. The CRO has also focused their resiliency work on anticipating what is to come down the road by assessing current and future community needs. An example is the Rural Resiliency and Recovery Roadmap Program, which brought together 16 different regional community teams with over 150 rural jurisdictions and non-governmental partners to support diversifying and strengthening their economies while building regional resiliency following the COVID-19 pandemic. Each regional team developed a roadmap that evaluates local stressors and how conditions may change in the future. This program also looks at what may impact the community from perspectives of housing availability, workforce, and potential resiliency stressors. Another example is the Camp Resilience: A Rural Prosperity Leadership Academy program, which offers a summer camp themed workshop to build rural community capacity to long-term stressors such as droughts, population loss, climate change, and lack of affordable housing. While funding cycle ebbs and flows
Explore this report to learn about radiation readiness capacity in the public health workforce.
Environmental health and public health preparedness staff work closely together to respond to natural disasters and climate change—learn how in this report.
This report provides critical insight into the top environmental health and natural disaster preparedness concerns across the nation.
How Mississippi Prioritizes Environmental Justice During Disaster Response Association of state and territorial health officials, astho, environmental health, environmental justice, public health, cross sector partnerships, emergency preparedness, natural disaster response, emergency response, health equity, social determinants of health, missisippi state department of health, office of environmental health, office of health equity, covid 19 pandemic, emergency planning and response Ali Aslam, Yaryna Onufrey, Beth Giambrone This case study dives into the Mississippi State Department of Health’s environmental justice initiatives, conducted using cross-sector partnerships. Environmental justice is defined as all people enjoying the same degree of access and protection from environmental and health hazards. This happens by intentionally involving all people—regardless of race, color, national origin, or income—while developing, implementing, and enforcing environmental laws and policies. The Mississippi State Department of Health incorporates environmental justice principles into their disaster response and emergency preparedness efforts. Mississippi's environmental justice work has been community-based and equity-driven. This case study dives into Mississippi’s cross-sector partnerships, community health initiatives, and health equity work as the state has worked to address environmental health concerns. Get the Report (PDF) website yes
Implementing Health in All Policies in the Climate Space ASTHO, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, HiAP lens, Health in all policies, climate change, climate space, flooding and rain, extreme weather, extreme heat, wildfire damage, seven strategies, Texas workgroup, national disaster operational workgroup, Washington state department of health, emergency preparedness and response, hiap implementation, Wisconsin department of health services, new mexico taskforce, interagency climate change taskforce, climate action teams, Climate and Health Capacity Survey, HiAP Task Force; Climate Change Commission, Resilience Initiative Kerry Wyss, Ali Aslam ASTHO | A Health in All Policies approach can help public health agencies better address the impact of climate change on population health and well-being. Each year, we face hurricanes, floods, extreme heat events, destructive wildfires, as well as other natural disasters and homeland security threats that test the resiliency of state, territorial, and freely associated state agencies and the communities they serve. To address the health threats posed by natural disasters and by climate change, more health agencies are integrating a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach. This cross-sector approach can make these climate efforts more effective and impactful, and help promote health equity and optimal health. This report outlines strategies for health agencies to apply the HiAP lens and utilize cross-sector collaboration to optimize their climate and health responses. Get the Report (PDF) website yes